Keeping a player against his will is pretty dangerous. Bigger clubs have caved in because of that including us.
£30 million for a fullback is never a bargain. He's never going to directly be responsible for our success like a number 9 would for example. Scoring goals at the top level is considered the hardest thing, hence its those players who go for record fees while fullbacks are usually signed for decent fees.
£30 million for a fullback is the absolute most that most teams will even consider. Thats what Alves went for and he's more than just a fullback, he has the end product of a winger.
Shaw could be worth £25-30 million, but it'll obviously never be a bargain. Thats paying a premium for an outstanding young talent
I quoted oneunited, not sure what you did there
but southampton do...
owe 27million in transfers plus have a 30 million bill due for their training ground and currently operating at a loss
so they are in a difficult financial position and thats according to their director
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/26813363
close enough.
Remember when we tried to sign bale in 2007, Southampton never got back To us, and he ended up at spurs. So it is either united were not convincing Southampton enough, or united were not that interested.
What Southampton are thinking, they either want all the cash in one payment, or? they are thinking, if united jumped right in the deep end with that 30 million bid, let's see how much milk is left in this cow
Remember when we tried to sign bale in 2007, Southampton never got back To us, and he ended up at spurs. So it is either united were not convincing Southampton enough, or united were not that interested.
What Southampton are thinking, they either want all the cash in one payment, or? they are thinking, if united jumped right in the deep end with that 30 million bid, let's see how much milk is left in this cow
I doubt we bidded 30m for bale