WeePat
Full Member
- Joined
- Apr 13, 2015
- Messages
- 19,395
- Supports
- Chelsea
If he is playing for your team, you wouldn't bother and he would be your favorite.
Of course but he doesn’t, so he’s not
If he is playing for your team, you wouldn't bother and he would be your favorite.
We can if he's got a release clause. The only problem is Liverpool or Barca may also be after him.
And they player has to agree to a move..... Man utd aren't really a more attractive prospect than Newcastle right now. Liverpool or Barca are possibilities.
I rate Paqueta higher.
He’s one of those players who would genuinely give the other teams contesting against City a legit shot at winning the league. Put him in any of the challenging midfields and there’d be transformed into something multiple times better than whatever they currently are. Criminal that we missed out on him.
I rate Paqueta higher.
Even from 2003, I don't get the idea where us signing players from Newcastle coming from. Back in the 90s till mid 2000, Newcastle was one of the most if you taking inflation rate into account.You think we can sign players from Newcastle? it's not 2003 anymore.
But yes. He's a very good player.
You put him with Rice and Odegaard; he’s far better than the rest at being a 2-way midfielder. He’s an exceptional player, a real driving force. I’m surprised you don’t think he’s that good, tbh.I’m not sure he’s that good, wouldn’t say he’s a good deal better than Partey Rice, Odegaard, Mac Allister Szoboszlai.
That’s a crazy take to be honest.I rate Paqueta higher.
That’s a crazy take to be honest.
Paqueta is more specialist playmaker/attacker than Guimaraes as a conductor. A conductor doing as well as Guimaraes would be coveted by most top teams even for squad role if he's available at reasonable fee. Not many top teams would look at Paqueta. City can played Alvarez in supporting striker role on top Bernardo Silva and Foden as advanced no 8. They sold Palmer who can play across the attacking/advanced midfielder position, who can very much be developed into better player than Paqueta. Not conclusively, but Paquate is likely a case of big fish small pond.Really? You think there's a lot between them?
Guimaraes is a bit more all action but I prefer Paqueta's elegance and technique on the ball. He would have excelled at City if that move had happened, would be perfect for Arsenal as a left 8 as well.
Paqueta is more specialist playmaker/attacker than Guimaraes as a conductor. A conductor doing as well as Guimaraes would be coveted by most top teams even for squad role if he's available at reasonable fee. Not many top teams would look at Paqueta. City can played Alvarez in supporting striker role on top Bernardo Silva and Foden as advanced no 8. They sold Palmer who can play across the attacking/advanced midfielder position, who can very much be developed into better player than Paqueta. Not conclusively, but Paquate is likely a case of big fish small pond.
Bad wind up attemptOverrated player. Would have problems even getting on our bench with current midfielders we got.
Overrated player. Would have problems even getting on our bench with current midfielders we got.
Doesn't mean he would succeed. Look at Kalvin Phillips since moving to City. Grealish has to be a different players to play well for City, and outside of last season, he can easily be out of the team when off form.He was on his way to City for £80m before the betting stuff came out.
Why? He reminds me of a Robbie Savage and I wouldn't call him world class player.Bad wind up attempt
Doesn't mean he would succeed. Look at Kalvin Phillips since moving to City. Grealish has to be a different players to play well for City, and outside of last season, he can easily be out of the team when off form.
City was after Fred, Maguire, Alexis Sanchez, Jorginho too. Their interest doesn't mean the players would always be a success at their level/PL top level.
I can understand that. I believe at one point he is linked with Arsenal but in the end Arsenal didn't make an official offer. He would have been a great buy for any EPL club.The lad isn’t leaving Newcastle to go to Utd. He trolled Arsenal when he signed for Newcastle and they were near the relegation zone and we were in top 4 position at the time. I honestly believe the only teams he’d leave for are the 2 Spanish giants, perhaps City at a push.
I’d say he’s 2 or three levels above Paqueta tbh.Really? You think there's a lot between them?
Guimaraes is a bit more all action but I prefer Paqueta's elegance and technique on the ball. He would have excelled at City if that move had happened, would be perfect for Arsenal as a left 8 as well.
I’d say he’s 2 or three levels above Paqueta tbh.
Paqueta is okay. Not convinced he’s special. Bruno is one of the best in the league in his position. I’ve never seen utd play West Ham and gone “bloody hell Paqueta is hurting us”. Must have missed his recent form or something.That’s wild. Paqueta is brilliant. I’d have Bruno in my team but I can’t quite tell if you’re overrating Bruno or underrating Paqueta here.
You put him with Rice and Odegaard; he’s far better than the rest at being a 2-way midfielder. He’s an exceptional player, a real driving force. I’m surprised you don’t think he’s that good, tbh.
Exactly.The lad isn’t leaving Newcastle to go to Utd. He trolled Arsenal when he signed for Newcastle and they were near the relegation zone and we were in top 4 position at the time. I honestly believe the only teams he’d leave for are the 2 Spanish giants, perhaps City at a push.
He should be red carded for violent play every other game, really. Newcastle are quite a disgusting team in general, and he sets the tone.Can't believe more isn't being made of his rash behavior on the pitch..
An over rated thug, really should have been sent off last night, not the first time he's lost his head on the pitch.
Agreed, nothing ever seems to be mentioned about it though!He should be red carded for violent play every other game, really. Newcastle are quite a disgusting team in general, and he sets the tone.
You’d love him in your side!!Can't believe more isn't being made of his rash behavior on the pitch..
An over rated thug, really should have been sent off last night, not the first time he's lost his head on the pitch.
There's a general narrative being built concerning Newcastle to paint them as plucky underdogs going through a fairytale. Nothing that is removed from that narrative will be discussed - it's like their time wasting last season, nothing was ever said about it even though all the data showed they were awful, but then in a game against us, Howe or some of the players mentioned we time wasted and it became a talking point about Utd. The media in general is terrible at having any kind of critical thinking, and are likely being fed narratives by their producers and editors, so that explains it.Agreed, nothing ever seems to be mentioned about it though!
Last night's 'tackle' was reckless and he had zero intention of going for the ball, he deliberately wanted to hurt the opposition.
Agreed, nothing ever seems to be mentioned about it though!
Last night's 'tackle' was reckless and he had zero intention of going for the ball, he deliberately wanted to hurt the opposition.
Going by that logic Caicedo and Colwill should also have seen red.
He's a thorough gobshite, just for celebrating a block like it was a goal in front of the Chelsea fans and his penalty celebraton in the shòotout as well..
Yeah this shit really needs to fecking end. Commentators and pundits are beyond insufferable with it. They’re a nation state club ffs.There's a general narrative being built concerning Newcastle to paint them as plucky underdogs going through a fairytale. Nothing that is removed from that narrative will be discussed - it's like their time wasting last season, nothing was ever said about it even though all the data showed they were awful, but then in a game against us, Howe or some of the players mentioned we time wasted and it became a talking point about Utd. The media in general is terrible at having any kind of critical thinking, and are likely being fed narratives by their producers and editors, so that explains it.