Gedson FernandesAh feck.
https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/51093859
Fernandes due for medical before loan move to Spurs
Gedson FernandesAh feck.
https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/51093859
Fernandes due for medical before loan move to Spurs
If that was the case he should have been signed straight when the window opened we have had plenty of time to do so. I still think this is not planned at all just trying to fix current situation we are in. Not that I have anything against us signing him this just reeks of panic buy if there ever was one.I think we were after him in the summer but his club started playing games and try to set up an auction. Understandly if they were trying to artificially inflate the price we stood back. Perhaps now is a more opportune moment to go back in as they have realised we won't be messed about with anymore.
This is ban worthy.Ah feck.
https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/51093859
Fernandes due for medical before loan move to Spurs
Ah feck.
https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/51093859
Fernandes due for medical before loan move to Spurs
Sorry guys, genuine mistake, can happen to anyone, I just missed the massive "Tottenham" thing in the banner and the feck that his first name is different.living up to your name here, @Massive Spanner
Was saying this to my Mrs last week.
Think we need to tug a bit harder if this is going to work.
I’m glad we look to be getting him but also frustrated. It was obvious we needed AT LEAST another midfielder in the summer and he was available. What the feck did we wait for.
But when do they break that before its reported in every other outlet?If Simon Stone says he wants to join, then he wants to join. BBC just won't report on conjecture and won't report something unless the source is as rock hard as Captain Holt's brain.
They were the first British journos to throw their hat on this on Friday.But when do they break that before its reported in every other outlet?
Have the BBC ever broken a story? Furthered it with an exclusive?
Its all well and good being this reliable but it cones with a price, and that price is being beaten to everything by everyone else. Everyone can be relaible if they just wait for official confirmation.
Saying that, Stone has specualated many times so its not gospel.
Yeah that's the trade off, though I think they were the first this side of the channel to report it. So while other journalists might jump the gun in order to get ahead of the pack, it won't necessarily be 100% accurate. Every other outlet will also report countless things that won't happen or is largely fictitious. BBC and Simon Stone won't.But when do they break that before its reported in every other outlet?
Have the BBC ever broken a story? Furthered it with an exclusive?
Its all well and good being this reliable but it cones with a price, and that price is being beaten to everything by everyone else. Everyone can be relaible if they just wait for official confirmation.
Saying that, Stone has specualated many times so its not gospel.
He's a funny one, under Moyes he was basically gosepl then for a few years he didn't seem to get given much by the club then over the last few years we seem to have made him our most reliable journalist again.Wasn’t Ducker considered to be fairly reliable, not so long ago? Or have I made that up?
If we get Bruno how is that still part of the pattern?The Pattern of Ed's play is getting quite predictable.
Leak Van De Beek rumours as soon as the city humiliation
Get Bruno rumours started and drag till end of the month and pull away with quotes "Sporting wanted too much", 'Agent wanted a part of OT as negotiations' etc and sustain the 'No value in the market' statements.
We might still get Bruno but the pattern emerging is not going to fool anyone
That was Ogden.He's a funny one, under Moyes he was basically gosepl
Sorry to be frank, but I can't believe anyone would genuinely believe this horseshit. And the fact you've included that last sentence just invalidates everything you've said before it.The Pattern of Ed's play is getting quite predictable.
Leak Van De Beek rumours as soon as the city humiliation
Get Bruno rumours started and drag till end of the month and pull away with quotes "Sporting wanted too much", 'Agent wanted a part of OT as negotiations' etc and sustain the 'No value in the market' statements.
We might still get Bruno but the pattern emerging is not going to fool anyone
It must get disheartening for the lad if you think you are getting transferred and it doesn't happen, then has to go back to just about carrying your football team.
The clue is in the name. Leave well alone i say.living up to your name here, @Massive Spanner
Imagine his relief when he signs for us and no longer has to carry a midfield...
Sorry guys, genuine mistake, can happen to anyone, I just missed the massive "Tottenham" thing in the banner and the feck that his first name is different.
Stone Cold Simon Stone pissing on everyone’s chips:
Talks held, no fee agreed as of yet.
From what the reports at the time suggested, we walked away from the Perisic deal because they were asking way too much for a player of his age and they wanted Martial as part of the deal which we felt didn't represent good value, hard to see us walking away from this one for such reasons.My fear is that we laboriously spin this out a'la Perisic and then mess it all up. But let's just pray.
Sorry to be frank, but I can't believe anyone would genuinely believe this horseshit. And the fact you've included that last sentence just invalidates everything you've said before it.
Stone Cold Simon Stone pissing on everyone’s chips: