Inter Yer Nan
Full Member
If he's as good as reported then perhaps it's one to be excited about. Good getting him in January too so he'll bed in early instead of coming back late from the Euro's and barely getting a pre-season.
I just checked this yesterday. He is 20 out of 22 from the spot, and 16 out of 17 since he joined Sporting.How often does he miss penalties? His run up looks like it'll give me stress.
So is that a positive or a negative? Can’t quite work it out.Not long ago if a player wanted to renew the contract for more money they would use United as the “club interested” as a platform to get the new contract, I remember Ramos and Ronaldo on the news a few years ago. That’s over!
His Dad's leg's have not been broken. Do not want.Roy Keane will be waiting in the car park to break his legs.
I hope the CAF has learnt its lesson from Fred and give him time to fit in a new team,league and country and dont write him off after he only manages 12 goals and 14 assists this season
So is that a positive or a negative? Can’t quite work it out.
If anyone needs their eyes opening this Bruno fiasco tells you all you need to know about what kind of incompetent twats are running the club. Haggling over 5-10m euros for a month, news about Barcelona interest leaked today and here we go Arnold and his master Woodward cave in and pay up. Absolute fecking clowns.
You have a problem with my modding ....?
So now you're taking it from the original offer me made, as opposed to the amount they originally asked for? Genuinely, this is getting a little ridiculous now.Y
Obviously not, but do you not think that our initial offer consisted of similar hard-to-reach objectives?
So, now that you’ve got all the sarcastic responses out of the way, can you answer my question and explain where you got the 20% price reduction from? You really think the starting point was them wanting a guaranteed €80m and we tricked them into taking €60m?
We’re obviously not going to agree on this but I’d rather have had the player integrated into the squad by the time we got to the winnable games (Burnley/wolves) and increased our chances of winning those games than having the money go to the Glazers in dividends, for an extra €5-10m, in a situation where our squad is paper thin.
If we’d have been a poor club I would’ve taken your point but the club has the third highest profits in all of football. Not like that amount is going to make or break the club that is in dire need of quality players to push for a slot in the CL. Not to mention the fact that having this deal over the line with two weeks to spare might’ve allowed us to focus on another target as well.
If you turn the 8 sideways then it reveals how much we're paying Sporting for him.
You know I’m taking the piss right?That’s a positive for me....sick of United’s name getting dragged into the papers and used by others, mostly when we’ve got no interest. It just ends up whipping fans into a frenzy unnecessarily....
99.9% of people on this forum (obviously me included) have no clue about the negotiation for Fernandes. It’s just another reason to post negativity about the club. If you’re going to believe everything you’ve read in the papers about this deal, I’ve got a deal on a bridge you might be interested in.....
Not a chance this will happen
And if it happen a 55 million for him are worse than 80 for Maguire
I really hope he's good. £50-60m is no small amount of money.
For that we could've gotten Buendia and Allan Saint-Maxim from the PL for a little more, both whom I rate highly. Just never know with players from weaker leagues.
I'm not saying we shouldn't negotiate, but if we were willing to pay a guaranteed €65m for him (assuming we make it into the CL in the next 5 years), I'm fairly sure we could've got him on Jan 1st for a guaranteed €5-10m more (and a maximum of €15m more). Our mistake was initiating the negotiations with a derisory offer (considering their very public valuation of him) that extended the negotiations by a couple of weeks.So now you're taking it from the original offer me made, as opposed to the amount they originally asked for? Genuinely, this is getting a little ridiculous now.
From the original quoted prices, to the prices we have been quoted now. Roughly a 20% difference. It is quite mind boggling that people think our club should not negotiate.
Has no one stopped to think about how this will affect Lingard's development??
Nah, Lingard's a kid. Got loads of time to develop into the worldclass midfielder.Has no one stopped to think about how this will affect Lingard's development??
He's too young to be starting. By the time Bruno is about to retire, Jesse will be entering prime years having benefited from his tutelage.Has no one stopped to think about how this will affect Lingard's development??
Has no one stopped to think about how this will affect Lingard's development??
Let me take you back to Dec 29th, three days before the transfer window opened
The fact that our club is so dysfunctional has made people forget what a normally functioning club looks like.
Nice!I just checked this yesterday. He is 20 out of 22 from the spot, and 16 out of 17 since he joined Sporting.
We need bodies up front so wouldn't rule it out.Does this mean we aren't signing islam slimani now? If so I'm very disappointed
Seems like the club have changed tact. I believe that Raiola was being a greedy cnut. On the other hand Dortmund was a great choice for his career.If we'd also managed to get Haaland this would have been a great window. Now need to get a striker/winger in on loan.
Does this mean we aren't signing islam slimani now? If so I'm very disappointed
Its Bruno. Bruno Anthony!
Yeah, I admitted as much in another post as well after the release clause had been pointed out and said that Hargreaves/Anderson/Nani announcement in May was a better example. However, I still stand by the point that we could've wrapped this up much earlier if we'd started negotiations way before the transfer window opened.This is the wrong transfer to use to make your point.
That's literally how every negotiation works. You're making the mistake of thinking there's some magic number Sporting wanted. They wanted as much as they could get because they're financially fecked. Whatever number you offer, they'll counter it with a higher one.I'm not saying we shouldn't negotiate, but if we were willing to pay a guaranteed €65m for him (assuming we make it into the CL in the next 5 years), I'm fairly sure we could've got him on Jan 1st for a guaranteed €5-10m more (and a maximum of €15m more). Our mistake was initiating the negotiations with a derisory offer (considering their very public valuation of him) that extended the negotiations by a couple of weeks.
Yeah I know why the Haaland deal didn't work out but would have backed us to be favourites for top 4 with both him and Bruno in.Seems like the club have changed tact. I believe that Raiola was being a greedy cnut. On the other hand Dortmund was a great choice for his career.
This definitely feels like a transfer we didn't intend to make though until the injuries started piling up. He was on our radar but we had to pull the trigger once Rashford, McTominay and Pogba got injured.Yeah, I admitted as much in another post as well after the release clause had been pointed out and said that Hargreaves/Anderson/Nani announcement in May was a better example. However, I still stand by the point that we could've wrapped this up much earlier if we'd started negotiations way before the transfer window opened.
They were trying to sell him last summer and had a fairly well-known debt, so why we waited to start negotiations until January and then dragged the negotiations out by severely low-balling them despite a known valuation for the sake of saving €5-10m is something I, as a supporter mostly concerned with our on-pitch performances and chances of CL qualification, disagree with. Like I said, having him available for Burnley/Wolves could've made a big difference in those two games. After all, we're spending big on him because we believe that he can make a difference.
Has no one stopped to think about how this will affect Lingard's development??
It was quite widely reported that they wanted €80m during the entire negotiation process.That's literally how every negotiation works. You're making the mistake of thinking there's some magic number Sporting wanted. They wanted as much as they could get because they're financially fecked. Whatever number you offer, they'll counter it with a higher one.
"Will nobody stop to think of the kids!?!?!?"Has no one stopped to think about how this will affect Lingard's development??
Can upload image but a mate sent me a photo of a United shirt with Fernandez and number 18