[FootballAI]

Arsenal did not play well, and if we had Bruno today the result would've been better. We look clueless in the attack without Bruno.

 

[Marwood]

On this year's performances there's as much chance that Bruno being in the team would have meant us getting a hammering as they'd keep getting the ball back after misplaced simple passes or Hollywood balls.

You think Bruno instead of McTominay yesterday makes us worse?!

 

[ItDoesntEvenMata]

You think Bruno instead of McTominay yesterday makes us worse?!

I don't think McTominay is anywhere near the level needed to get the club back to where we are so it's a moot comparison.

But I think Bruno in a team makes us far more open, liable to lose the ball when under the cosh and takes away a massive element of control from the game. Yeah sure, we might have had a chance or two more but from 1-0 down he'd have undoubtedly have given them the ball back about 10 times - as has happened in several games this season where we've been beaten heavily

 

[Martial]

The performances in the last two games with both Mason Mount and McTominay in the 10 role, reminded me of the before-times before Bruno, starting either Lingard or Periera in that position week-in week-out.

Things can get bleaker.