For me, I don’t think he’s the worst player that we have by any stretch, but I do think he’s the most important to replace. I don’t see any point in saying he can be replaced last because if you want to go off in a certain direction in building a team, you don’t head off down the opposite road to do so, with your grand plan being to make a U-turn once you get to the end.
We have worse players than Bruno that can be upgraded essentially for a better version of themselves like Dalot - or other underperformers like Shaw and Rashford. Once Bruno is out of the team, my guess os that you look for a different profile of player altogether, which means it makes little sense to build a team that plays in a way that facilitates a player with a ‘particular set of skills’ that you may not want as a foundation of your final approach. With a player like Rashford - you want a 20 goal, right-footed LWF who is fast, dynamic, makes runs in behind and scores. Whatever anyone thinks of Rashford’s form, he is at least the right profile, and if you ultimately think he isn’t good enough - then you ship him out and get a Rafael Leao or even an Mbappé if you can. It’s not like we currently have Mata there but want a Leao.
Bruno isn’t actually, generally speaking, bad at what HE does. The problem is what he doesn’t do. He needs to go. Him being replaced is an inevitability, certainly if we want to become successful again. The longer we deliberate and mitigate about that decision, the longer it will take for us to get our shit together, because there is a glass ceiling on any team playing ‘Bruno-ball’, no matter what else you do with the team.