Desert Eagle
Punjabi Dude
- Joined
- Sep 25, 2006
- Messages
- 18,397
It's the rashford playbook.Why do people keep throwing out stats as some desperate attempt to show he is still playing well. He has been shambolic for a good 3/4 of the season
It's the rashford playbook.Why do people keep throwing out stats as some desperate attempt to show he is still playing well. He has been shambolic for a good 3/4 of the season
Why do they call him Bruno Fernage on that game? Quite odd when his name is obviously Fernandes in the text.Crap? He made it into the Fifa 22 team of the season...
Shows what we know.
I'm looking at that stat and thinking let's sign romeu as our dm
Why do they call him Bruno Fernage on that game? Quite odd when his name is obviously Fernandes in the text.
Did not know this, cheers lad..It's how his name is supposed to be pronounced. He said it himself. Something about being Portuguese.
Would make sense to address the biggest issues in our team/the weakest link before getting to Bruno though. Which would mean giving him more than a fair chance at playing with good players around him.I think he is not going to make it in a possession based team. His first touch and his short passing is not that good. His long passing is good. Maybe with better players around him in midfield he may make it.
Why do they call him Bruno Fernage on that game? Quite odd when his name is obviously Fernandes in the text.
It's how his name is supposed to be pronounced. He said it himself. Something about being Portuguese.
Would make sense to address the biggest issues in our team/the weakest link before getting to Bruno though. Which would mean giving him more than a fair chance at playing with good players around him.
Never understand why fans always go after the highest profile/best players who might be underperforming as the priority to replace, rather than the actual weakest links who easily aren't good enough?
I wonder how Ten Hag will play him next season. I dont see him in a midfield 3 as he it not good enough with the ball (passing, press resistant etc). We will probably see him in various roles before selling him the summer after that, unless he shines as a wide attacking midfielder or as a false 9. He did work like a dream in Solskjaers counter attacking system, scoaring goals and assisting Rashford and Martial, but those days are long gone and Ten hags style is nothing like that.
So you think the only 2 positions Ten Haag will use him is false 9 or wide player?
Have you watched how ETH plays? Bruno is not a winger. ETH wants his wingers to be wide, Bruno isnt that player.
He is a creative player, ETH this season has played with a CAM. Alot of Ajax fans also say Bruno will work in his system.
Didnt say that, but i dont think he will be our number 10 in the longrun in Ten Hags system, so unless he he can work as a wide attacker or false 9 (which Ten Hag used in his first Ajax team) i dont think he has a future here. Also doubt a lot of Ajax fans see United regulary, and how can Bruno work in a possession based system with his high risk passes and crap press resistant attributes ? Ajax never used a player similar to him under Ten Hag either in the CAM role.
Thats true, i dont sit here with the facts or insight into Ten Hags plans. Its just my feeling based on the games i watched both from United and Ten Hags Ajax over the years.Likewise ManUtd fans wouldn't have seen Ajax regularly to know what kind of players ETH wants and how he sets up his team in detail. They would have watched couple of youtube videos or couple of CL games.
Have you ever seen Bruno play in a possession based system? But you can write him off.
United dont have players that can keep the ball behind him, if everyone is able to keep the ball well enough, I am sure he will be able to pass the ball around.
Why do people make things up based on an agenda? Ajax have used Berghuis as a 10 in a 4-2-3-1 system and you know what his passing accuracy is? 78% compare to 75% of Bruno.
But ofcourse Ten Hag wouldn't use a player that "cant pass"
Didnt say that, but i dont think he will be our number 10 in the longrun in Ten Hags system, so unless he he can work as a wide attacker or false 9 (which Ten Hag used in his first Ajax team) i dont think he has a future here. Also doubt a lot of Ajax fans see United regulary, and how can Bruno work in a possession based system with his high risk passes and crap press resistant attributes ? Ajax never used a player similar to him under Ten Hag either in the CAM role.
Have you ever seen Bruno play in a possession based system? But you can write him off.
United dont have players that can keep the ball behind him, if everyone is able to keep the ball well enough, I am sure he will be able to pass the ball around.
Why do people make things up based on an agenda? Ajax have used Berghuis as a 10 in a 4-2-3-1 system and you know what his passing accuracy is? 78% compare to 75% of Bruno.
But ofcourse Ten Hag wouldn't use a player that "cant pass"
He was shocking in possession even with Pogba and Matic behind himsurprisingly, people do not see that!
Apparently leads the league in chance creation this season according to Opta. Was surprised to see that.
Surely not as terrible as folks try to make out
Have you ever seen Bruno play in a possession based system? But you can write him off.
United dont have players that can keep the ball behind him, if everyone is able to keep the ball well enough, I am sure he will be able to pass the ball around.
Why do people make things up based on an agenda? Ajax have used Berghuis as a 10 in a 4-2-3-1 system and you know what his passing accuracy is? 78% compare to 75% of Bruno.
But ofcourse Ten Hag wouldn't use a player that "cant pass"
He'll always create chances, he needs to get the rest of his game up to par which he is of course more than capable of but like everyone else, has not been good this season. He'll be fine next year.Apparently leads the league in chance creation this season according to Opta. Was surprised to see that.
Surely not as terrible as folks try to make out
It's the rashford playbook.
He's played poorly, but the fact he's still creating this amount of chances actually proves he's a quality player and one of the best chance creators aroundIf you watch all of our games surely you don’t need Opta to form an opinion. This is similar to that ‘Bruno’s bad season’ thread in the mains.
Having watched him every week, do you think he’s played well or poorly?
He's played poorly, but the fact he's still creating this amount of chances actually proves he's a quality player and one of the best chance creators around
He'll always create chances, he needs to get the rest of his game up to par which he is of course more than capable of but like everyone else, has not been good this season. He'll be fine next year.
He was one of the best players in the league in his first year here. After that, we can't just discard him after a season where just about every player at the club was terrible. He has proven that he has what it takes, now he has to get back into form. If another year goes by and he hasn't done that, we can start to think about moving him on.
He's good at a lot of things. He's very active, has great off the ball movement( which is why he scores), is a decent short passer, has good technique and is actually decent at keeping the ball. Sure, he's not a great dribble, but the doesn't mean he can't do it at all. I'm sure if you look at that statistic and as well as previous seasons, you will notice that outside of him, we don't have any chance creators. Bruno has consistently had the burden of being the sole chance creator in a team that doesn't create chances. Yet people are on his case for constantly trying to take risks.
The fact is, we have a team that hardly ever controls game and properly supports the attack. We had this before Bruno and we've had this with him. You can try and be efficient with possession, but on this team at present, that would simply lead to you being passive and ineffective, similar to Jadon Sancho or Juan Mata or you can be aggressive and take risks like Bruno who has been our saving grace for the last few seasons. At the end of the day, the real issues are behind our attackers.
I actually think, outside of the big games where we were woeful as a team, Bruno was actually playing well under Ole. Rangnick coming in gradually destroyed any form of attacking flair our team had. He more than anyone else is responsible for how disjointed and hard to watch our team has been since December; not Bruno. By even watching games, highlights, goals; this is quite clear. Rangnick tried shut down our attacking play to get control of games, Bruno, Ronaldo and Rashford have been the primary casualties of that( Greenwood would have been too)
Nonsense.I think he is not going to make it in a possession based team. His first touch and his short passing is not that good. His long passing is good. Maybe with better players around him in midfield he may make it.
Pfffft. I choose not to believe it. I'm going with the ever reliable eye test. I'm pretty sure I'm correct in saying that Bruno hasn't created a single chance since mid January.Interesting..
He’s created 15 big chances in 35 games this season.Every game he creates at least two big chances. Even at his worst.
Every game he creates at least two big chances. Even at his worst.
Interesting..