No competent club allows their players to get within two years of the end of their contract. Fergie used to operate like that and talks to extend contracts would start way earlier than from the two years before the expiry date. I don't see that as a issue and if the club wants to get rid of Bruno in the future and Bruno isn't feeling wanted, he'll leave on his own accord to play football regularly elsewhere imo. I don't see this as a issue like with what happened with Jones, Mata etc. And I have my opinions on that, but that's for a different thread.
Bruno plays a very direct vertical game in a team that isn't good at counter pressing and hence the risk reward/ratio isn't good right now. But I think if he's in a team that is adept at winning the ball back high up the pitch in a coordinated fashion then his high risk, vertical approach would be more effective imo.
And ten Hag is a coach that wants to dominate the ball via positional play when the opponent is sitting off in a compact low block but he also wants his team to go very direct when space opens up, especially, straight after the winning the ball back. So in both equations, Bruno does have his uses, because in the first equation he can be utilised as one of the multiple #10s, to overload the half spaces with emphasis on positional rotation which would potentially open up a space in the centre space or wide space to exploit.
But I'm personally hoping Hannibal is the player that will be the long term solution as the creative CM going forward. And him being understudy to Bruno for now is probably a sensible approach imo.