PepsiCola
New Member
- Joined
- Jan 29, 2016
- Messages
- 1,724
3 players out from a squad of approximately 30 is literally decimated
This is going to go over a lot of heads
3 players out from a squad of approximately 30 is literally decimated
We need a deep lying playmaker this summer.I actually thought he had more impact on the game when he switched roles, it's not ideal but I'm not sure under Ole what works best as our team lacks a clear playing ethos when we are in possession.
He is Pogba's replacement - at least it's been done in advance. If they can be on the same pitch and maybe get top 4 then job done but Pogba is off in the summer.
Well, he has to be good enough for us, first. Then we'll see if it's possible for us to be better off with him instead of Pogba. I'm doubtful about that tbh. Pogba has just so much natural ability, which does count. I'm sure you don't think we'd be a better team with Scotty Parker replacing Pogba for example.He is more of a leader on the field than Pogba, that is clear immediately. He is not as extravagantly talented, but that doesn’t mean United can’t be a better team with that switch.
Yeah. If he's the replacement there would have to be enough development of the rest of the team.If Bruno is Pogba's singular replacement then we are just as idiotic as I thought.
Maddison, and a Top Playmaking DM is still needed if Pogba goes. Then we can talk about best Midfield. Of course we need a CF also.Yeah. If he's the replacement there would have to be enough development of the rest of the team.
Well, he has to be good enough for us, first. Then we'll see if it's possible for us to be better off with him instead of Pogba. I'm doubtful about that tbh. Pogba has just so much natural ability, which does count. I'm sure you don't think we'd be a better team with Scotty Parker replacing Pogba for example.
The logic is fine. Because it's targetted at a rationale rather than comparing players actual abilities.That's not a very good logic is it? Scott Parker and Bruno.
It's like comparing Ravel Morrison to Pogba, just because they have natural ability, they aren't the same players are they?
I get it, if it doesn't suit your argument then you won't buy it, no matter what.
My judgment on Bruno last year wasn't really blind judgment. I had watched him played very often in his international game since he was linked with us and he's more a playmaker rather than just attacking mid. Ironically, I even posted an article to you about how Bruno plays and you didn't buy it because the article doesn't suit your argument.
Sporting fans got no clue what sort of player Mkhytaryan was. I don't know what's your stand right now is, whether you are changing your mind or no but if you are still insisting that Bruno is closer to Mkhytaryan than Scholes or Lampard after watching the game in the weekend then I guess I shall end this conversation because it feels like I'm talking to a wall.
We need a deep lying playmaker this summer.
Well, he has to be good enough for us, first. Then we'll see if it's possible for us to be better off with him instead of Pogba. I'm doubtful about that tbh. Pogba has just so much natural ability, which does count. I'm sure you don't think we'd be a better team with Scotty Parker replacing Pogba for example.
Off the top of my head we've had significant injury lay offs for Pogba, Rashford, McT, Matic, Dalot, Tuanzebe, That's not to mention the normal smaller lay off for the likes of Martial and Shaw. We've been badly affected. How many times have we been able to play our strongest 11 this season? Not many if any.We haven't really been decimated. We've had 3 key players injured for a long period though, which is made much worse because we have no depth. But the injuries came about because of that lack of depth (for 2 of them at least). 3 injuries isnt crazy. It's just bad luck it's to key players at the same time.
But yeah, all fit, we'd have an excellent starting 11 IMO. Not sure we'll do that at any point this season but we'll see.
Very good3 players out from a squad of approximately 30 is literally decimated
Some mad shit going down in here.Don't think I've seen a worse United-debut
Off the top of my head we've had significant injury lay offs for Pogba, Rashford, McT, Matic, Dalot, Tuanzebe, That's not to mention the normal smaller lay off for the likes of Martial and Shaw. We've been badly affected. How many times have we been able to play our strongest 11 this season? Not many if any.
100%. He was terrible.Are people actually saying he had a bad debut? Shameful - the guy was excellent. Not everything he tried came off but a lot did and considering that he had 1 training session before this to get to know his teammates I'd say he did feckin spectacularly well! Love him already - he's going to be a beast for us.
100%. He was terrible.
This reminds me of pre season when everyone was saying how well James was playing when in fact he was very poor. Being outperformed by Greenwood, Chong and Gomes. However, because he was a new signing, people were a lot more lenient on their rating of him. Same goes for Bruno's performance.
Yes, to each their own, mate.Goes to show how different perspectives can be. 100% disagree but that's why we love the game, right? Everybody has their own view of things. Also disagree that James was poor. I think any neutral would tell you he surprised most people by how good he was in the first couple of months of the season. He has dropped off significantly since then but I think he started really well.
I mean, I and some others were saying his loose general play would be a problem in the summer, so it's nothing new! It's one of the reasons I was hoping we'd opt for someone different.It didn't take long before people came up with out of context "possession lost" stats
You guys will moan about KdB too as he loses possession more than most players in the league.
mean, I and some others were saying his loose general play would be a problem in the summer, so it's nothing new! It's one of the reasons I was hoping we'd opt for someone different
Of course. That's why I didn't want that type of CM/AM, though. Especially as his passing is very, very hit and miss. Even for a risk taker. I wanted a CM/AM that would elevate our general play - not more players that are mainly known for their goal and assist stats, and the odd excellent pass here and there like the previous three we've bought.He is attacking mid who takes lot of risks, they always lose possession more than your regular CMs.
Of course. That's why I didn't want that type of CM/AM, though. Especially as his passing is very, very hit and miss. Even for a risk taker. I wanted a CM/AM that would elevate our general play - not more players that are mainly known for their goal and assist stats, and the odd excellent pass here and there like the previous three we've bought.
If we bring in a coach that can implement cohesive football like Poch or someone I don't think he'll be bad here, but if we stick with our way of having to rely on individual quality like we have done for the past near decade, I think he'll have the same problems here as Kagawa, Mata and Mkhi.
Some mad shit going down in here.
And doing a lowlight reel on a player's debut where he was the only player trying to do anything is mega wanky.
Like I said, in the context of him being a 65 million signing it was a terrible debut. A "Pereira-esque" performance was not what I expecting to see and surely he's a lot better than that. If that was one of his good performances we are fecked.
Whilst I agree it wasn't a great debut, to call it terrible is going too far in the opposite direction. He was trying thing that weren't coming off, unfortunately, but was very much in the game and vital to us not conceding on a couple of occasions. As many others have already said, he'd only had one training session with us, maybe you were expecting miracles, I certainly wasn't.100%. He was terrible.
This reminds me of pre season when everyone was saying how well James was playing when in fact he was very poor. Being outperformed by Greenwood, Chong and Gomes. However, because he was a new signing, people were a lot more lenient on their rating of him. Same goes for Bruno's performance.
100%. He was terrible.
This reminds me of pre season when everyone was saying how well James was playing when in fact he was very poor. Being outperformed by Greenwood, Chong and Gomes. However, because he was a new signing, people were a lot more lenient on their rating of him. Same goes for Bruno's performance.
3 players out from a squad of approximately 30 is literally decimated
He was not terrible at all.100%. He was terrible.
This reminds me of pre season when everyone was saying how well James was playing when in fact he was very poor. Being outperformed by Greenwood, Chong and Gomes. However, because he was a new signing, people were a lot more lenient on their rating of him. Same goes for Bruno's performance.
Do you get all your info from SSN headlines? £65m after alot of clauses, most they wont even see. PFA player, Ballon Dor, CL. Dont be daft, we have only paid £46m so far.
Perreira esque? When does Perreira shoot on target? When does he control the play? When does he drive passes into the ST?
He came in on thursday, one training session and you exepct him to be Ronaldo?
That's because he's having to force it through the eye of a needle.In euros, sorry. 55 mill straight up, plus 10 in realistic clauses.
Pereira doesn't control the play, but neither did Fernandes. 4-5 of his poor passes led to dangerous counter attacks for Wolves. They both had some terrible passing and both had a shot straight at the keeper.
Can't blame shit passing and poor set-pieces on having just one training session.
He is more of a leader on the field than Pogba, that is clear immediately. He is not as extravagantly talented, but that doesn’t mean United can’t be a better team with that switch.