Eli Zee
New Member
- Joined
- Feb 20, 2017
- Messages
- 1,072
This dude will be the catalyst to us winning trophies I hope. It's like everything came together when he came into the team. Everything.
Calm down now. Bruno is brilliant, he's the best midfielder we have right now. But Scholes is probably the best midfielder to ever play for us.Bruno imho is a better player than Paul Scholes was...his stats alone back that up...but not as good a passer. Misplaced passes have little effect on us when he attempts and completes so many. KDB is more tidy but will end up with similar or less numbers to Bruno. Bruno does everything at 100mph.
Bruno imho is a better player than Paul Scholes was...his stats alone back that up...but not as good a passer. Misplaced passes have little effect on us when he attempts and completes so many. KDB is more tidy but will end up with similar or less numbers to Bruno. Bruno does everything at 100mph.
Hate him, but one of premier league’s best midfielders.
Come on man let’s not do this hyperbolic nonsense.Bruno imho is a better player than Paul Scholes was...his stats alone back that up...but not as good a passer. Misplaced passes have little effect on us when he attempts and completes so many. KDB is more tidy but will end up with similar or less numbers to Bruno. Bruno does everything at 100mph.
I bet the same people moaning about Bruno used to be the same people who would moan about Nani. It's unbelievable. It doesn't matter if you you loose the ball while taking risks. If you do, you just try again. Eventually it will pay off for them. Two absolutely brilliant players.
Bruno's career passing % is 75 while Rodriguez's is 85.7. That's a huge difference no matter how you look at it. Messi's is 83.7 and Ozil is at 86.3. KDB is at 79 and he can also be sloppy despite people not acknowledging it. He's the lowest by a fair margin and let's not act like you don't know why given you as a United fan you watch every game of his.
It's not like all his misplaced passes are difficult eye of the needle passes either. A lot of them are regulation simple plays. Some of the is just general poor decision making. He needs to improve that of he's that become one of the best players in that he world.
They do tend to be, yeah. But that thing you deem irrelevant is one of the key things that prevented Nani from going on to a team like Madrid or Bayern, and being considered a brilliant player by neutral fans. The volume of mistakes you make while taking risks clearly matters. If you take as many risks while executing more of them and making fewer basic mistakes then you are better. That has tended to separate the very best from the levels below.
Bruno imho is a better player than Paul Scholes was...his stats alone back that up...
Oh stop it, Bruno is no Cantona.You'd have hated Cantona. He was also wasteful and inconsistent, and nobody cared because he made things happen. Just like Bruno.
A better signing than Wayne Rooney you think? That‘s a big claim.Will go down as our best signing since Cristiano Ronaldo rocked up to Old Trafford.
Absolute superstar
He would need to have a seriously impressive next 5 or 6 years to justify that ahead of Rooney, De Gea, or Carrick.Will go down as our best signing since Cristiano Ronaldo rocked up to Old Trafford.
Absolute superstar
His passing % were crap even in Portugal.He barely misplaced a pass against PSG. So he can take care of the ball when he wants to. Probably recognizes urgency is a priority in the premier league where teams sit deep...even at the risk of misplacing a pass here n there.
He would need to have a seriously impressive next 5 or 6 years to justify that ahead of Rooney, De Gea, or Carrick.
I like your post. I don't think Bruno has a problem because his touch isn't as good as others, or that he chooses to control it more exotically than others. I just think that's his style, to try high risk moves because he actually has the technical ability to do that and it will pay off consistently. You simply can't make that work if your technique isn't consistently great. It's very demanding because you will fail, but Bruno does it without fear and has the endurance to make it work. I actually think De Bruyne is a very similar player but he contains himself to the benefit of his team in the context of Pep's tactics, where he just plays a different role. If you swap their roles I highly doubt De Bruyne would elevate because of superior technique, I think he would look similarly sloppy at times.The most important measure of technique is consistency. How consistently can you get your first touch right? People who can get it right 90% of the time are better than those who can get it right 70% of the time, almost always. Someone who can control it in a range of exotic ways can close that gap slightly, but not much, it just isn't as important. And it tends to be the case that the players who can do pull off the exotic touches most consistently are also the ones with the more consistent first touch in general, they just go for the simple touch more often because they are better at getting into the position to not have to try high risk moves.
Agree with the Gerrard comparison myself. He was capable of more exceptional technical moments than Scholes but minute by minute his technique was less reliable. Bruno is unreliable in that sense and always will be, because his technique is at least one level below the best.
Bruno imho is a better player than Paul Scholes was...his stats alone back that up...but not as good a passer. Misplaced passes have little effect on us when he attempts and completes so many. KDB is more tidy but will end up with similar or less numbers to Bruno. Bruno does everything at 100mph.
Will go down as our best signing since Cristiano Ronaldo rocked up to Old Trafford.
Absolute superstar
Just when you thought it couldn’t get any worse....Bruno imho is a better player than Paul Scholes was...his stats alone back that up...but not as good a passer. Misplaced passes have little effect on us when he attempts and completes so many. KDB is more tidy but will end up with similar or less numbers to Bruno. Bruno does everything at 100mph.
Think you might be forgetting someone. I’ll give you a clue - your username.Will go down as our best signing since Cristiano Ronaldo rocked up to Old Trafford.
Absolute superstar
No. Just.......... No.Bruno imho is a better player than Paul Scholes was
Why? Carrick was arguably our best and most consistent midfielder throughout the club's most successful ever 6-7 year period of football. Not sure how he can be classed as anything other than a brilliant signing.It really shows how poor United's transfer activity has been in recent years when the top 3 transfers in the last 17 years include Michael Carrick!!!
I don't get the logic. Are you implying Carrick was not a brilliant transfer? We can do a lot worse than a transfer at that relative level.It really shows how poor United's transfer activity has been in recent years when the top 3 transfers in the last 17 years include Michael Carrick!!!
most consistent? Absolutely. Best? No Scholes was better 2006-9. Fletcher 08-10. Then there were periods were Giggs was also better. Most people felt like he was the weakest link in 2008 actually but that’s nothing to be ashamed off looking at our starting 11 in that famous night in MoscowWhy? Carrick was arguably our best and most consistent midfielder throughout the club's most successful ever 6-7 year period of football. Not sure how he can be classed as anything other than a brilliant signing.
Bruno imho is a better player than Paul Scholes was...his stats alone back that up...but not as good a passer. Misplaced passes have little effect on us when he attempts and completes so many. KDB is more tidy but will end up with similar or less numbers to Bruno. Bruno does everything at 100mph.
I combined best and most consistent as in, he was our best midfielder over that period. No doubt there were times when others outplayed him. I'd also argue that he in 12/13 was as good, if not better, than any of the others. He was basically a one man midfield.most consistent? Absolutely. Best? No Scholes was better 2006-9. Fletcher 08-10. Then there were periods were Giggs was also better. Most people felt like he was the weakest link in 2008 actually but that’s nothing to be ashamed off looking at our starting 11 in that famous night in Moscow