Bluemoon goes into Meltdown

The holy trinity 68 said:
It is remarkable and mind boggling that Blue Moon is far worse than RAWK. Takes some doing but they have managed it. They are the most deluded and bitter fan forum, add to that their complete lack of self awareness and hypocritical views.
Click to expand...
Oh Bluemoon is comfortably number 1 in terms of hypocrisy, arrogance and bias. Its in a league on its own.

You'll never see them lose a match fairly, and admit it. Always the bent refs, a penalty not given, a decision against them, the league making sure they lose. They come out with some absolute belters.

Some of the best ones i can remember were 'Sky turn down the mics at Etihad only, so they can peddle the narrative that its quiet'. 'Sky dont show the whole ground so they can continue the theme that its never full.' 'Refs are warned that they face sanctions if City get penalties' But yet some of the stuff they claim is stonewall penos, is about as far from a penalty as you can imagine. haha

Some fecking right nonsense, and these are grown adults. Also funny that if you disagree with anyone, or criticise Pep, you're a Rag

Trying to convince themselves the Der Spiegel stuff was bollocks and made up when there was literally email screenshots was quite amusing, too.
 
ZolaWasMagic said:
Oh Bluemoon is comfortably number 1 in terms of hypocrisy, arrogance and bias. Its in a league on its own.

You'll never see them lose a match fairly, and admit it. Always the bent refs, a penalty not given, a decision against them, the league making sure they lose. They come out with some absolute belters.

Some of the best ones i can remember were 'Sky turn down the mics at Etihad only, so they can peddle the narrative that its quiet'. 'Sky dont show the whole ground so they can continue the theme that its never full.' 'Refs are warned that they face sanctions if City get penalties' But yet some of the stuff they claim is stonewall penos, is about as far from a penalty as you can imagine. haha

Some fecking right nonsense, and these are grown adults. Also funny that if you disagree with anyone, or criticise Pep, you're a Rag

Trying to convince themselves the Der Spiegel stuff was bollocks and made up when there was literally email screenshots was quite amusing, too.
Click to expand...

It's the sheer venom that gets me. Although it's also amusing how, on the same page, you have posts expressing outrage at homophobic songs from Liverpool fans about "rent boys", and posts expressing their disgust at "dippers" and "rent boys". Bluemoon is hypocrisy and extreme hatred rolled into one.
 
sangria said:
It's the sheer venom that gets me. Although it's also amusing how, on the same page, you have posts expressing outrage at homophobic songs from Liverpool fans about "rent boys", and posts expressing their disgust at "dippers" and "rent boys". Bluemoon is hypocrisy and extreme hatred rolled into one.
Click to expand...
Exactly. They're becoming a parody
 
Had to laugh listening to Micah Richards going apeshit about the Milner tackle on Silva. Silva was in mid-dive when Milner stuck his leg out and win the ball. Garragher was cool and asked Richards opinion on the Walker tackle in the Southampton game which was a clear penalty. A bit rich a City ex-player moaning about tackles after they had DeJong and Kompany two of the dirtiest players breathing and now Fernandinho who is a thug. Guardiola and Richards should have eye patches they are that one-eyed.
 
Offsideagain said:
Had to laugh listening to Micah Richards going apeshit about the Milner tackle on Silva. Silva was in mid-dive when Milner stuck his leg out and win the ball. Garragher was cool and asked Richards opinion on the Walker tackle in the Southampton game which was a clear penalty. A bit rich a City ex-player moaning about tackles after they had DeJong and Kompany two of the dirtiest players breathing and now Fernandinho who is a thug. Guardiola and Richards should have eye patches they are that one-eyed.
Click to expand...

I forgot Micah was on. Thank God I avoided the pre, post and half time 'analysis' altogether. It was bad enough with stroke victim Gary Neville doing the commentary.
 
Bwuk said:
I sometimes feel sorry for the City fans who've supported them for years having to listen to the idiots who've appeared after the £££.
Click to expand...

You must be an extremely empathetic person to feel sorry for 5 people.
 
Surely they are happy about this? The more plastic clubs with evil owners, the better. If every club is filthy, then their success receives more merit.
 
OleBoiii said:
Surely they are happy about this? The more plastic clubs with evil owners, the better. If every club is filthy, then their success receives more merit.
Click to expand...
They'll just have to suck it up, there's absolutely nothing they can say about Newcastle, no matter what they go on to win.
 
Mansour s fortune (in other words, Abu Dhabi fortune) is apparently £25 billion. Saudis fortune, £345 billion. Oh oh.
 
I wonder what the feeling is among the new gen city supporters. They don’t have the “history” draw of the other big clubs, nor are they the richest club around anymore. It’ll be interesting to see what happens to them when Pep goes.

Have there been any meltdowns over there?
 
Cloud7 said:
I wonder what the feeling is among the new gen city supporters. They don’t have the “history” draw of the other big clubs, nor are they the richest club around anymore. It’ll be interesting to see what happens to them when Pep goes.

Have there been any meltdowns over there?
Click to expand...

Probably easy come easy go, and they'll worry about it, if and when they are threatened.

If the league are adamant that it's not a state backed club, then what will they say if Newcastle suddenly started bopping 100m on individual players.
What is the distinction in their eyes, if the same guy is the main guy in both the state and the fund!
 
Cloud7 said:
I wonder what the feeling is among the new gen city supporters. They don’t have the “history” draw of the other big clubs, nor are they the richest club around anymore. It’ll be interesting to see what happens to them when Pep goes.

Have there been any meltdowns over there?
Click to expand...

I had a quick look on there last night and a lot of them seem to think it’s a good thing that there’s a another club that can break up the “old mafia” as they say. They don’t think it’ll affect them much.
 
Offsideagain said:
Mansour s fortune (in other words, Abu Dhabi fortune) is apparently £25 billion. Saudis fortune, £345 billion. Oh oh.
Click to expand...
Saudis is way more than that, MBS has said they are on track for $2T by 2030. yes, that is a 'T' not a 'B'.
 
Sandikan said:
Probably easy come easy go, and they'll worry about it, if and when they are threatened.

If the league are adamant that it's not a state backed club, then what will they say if Newcastle suddenly started bopping 100m on individual players.
What is the distinction in their eyes, if the same guy is the main guy in both the state and the fund!
Click to expand...
The FA will still be digging through the stack of fat brown envelopes.
 
To be honest, I will be ok with the Saudi's at Newcastle so long as MBS promises to recreate the 'Fog on the Tyne' song and music video with him taking the place of Gazza.
 
Sassy Colin said:
Well, he needs to go somewhere where he can buy a new team, so it's perfect for him and, because it's Pep, the 'top' players might be prepared to brave the North East Winters.
Click to expand...

not immediately. He’ll let someone build a winning team first and then slide in.

I’ve also see a rumour that Newcastle are/were considering a training complex in London to use during the week and they will fly the squad in/out for games.
 
Does FFP mean the playing field is level or what? I just don't understand this.

On one hand nufc are now the richest and can buy whatever they want. On the other FFP means they can only spend what fifa/uefa /utd/lfc dictate.
Click to expand...

What does this even mean?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.