giorno
boob novice
- Joined
- Jul 20, 2016
- Messages
- 28,816
- Supports
- Real Madrid
Well, it's not like Brehme was known for his crosses or ambidexterity
Well, it's not like Brehme was known for his crosses or ambidexterity
Brilliant first try! Hopefully you'll stick with us
@Joga Bonito is Pele Kryptonite. I remember in the 40s draft when even Pele-Muller partnership couldn't win the game against him. Actually come to think of it, I don't remember Pele winning a crunch draft game ever, which is bonkers.
Well played both mangers, it was really interesting to follow.
From what I've seen there is not that much between the two versions to be honest. Just the natural progression of a player getting more mature and losing some physicality. It wasn't quite as drastic as someone like Scholes. In both versions he was an elite creative forward who can score from anywhere and also set up a few for others.Wasn't quite sure which Pele it was to be frank. Both the earlier and latter version would make sense in this setup and maybe he should have been sold the idea(not the player) a bit more.
From what I've seen there is not that much between the two versions to be honest. Just the natural progression of a player getting more mature and losing some physicality. In both versions he was an elite creative forward who can score from anywhere and also set up a few for others.
Matthäus won that for @Joga Bonito. As dominant as Keane, but with a greater goal threat. Lucho on steroids, basically @Moby
In particular I think the contribution of Ruud Gullit would be significant yet its had very little mention - in my opinion he's comfortably one of the most underrated players throughout these Caf drafts. I've never picked him myself and he's the type of player I'd like Joga to pick one time and put some real effort into selling properly (a la Schuster, Suarez) as he really was a fantastic player. When I first watched that Holland side it was Gullit who stood out ahead of both Rijkaard and Van Basten - part of that was obviously his appearance and sheer physicality and size, but he was also the most consistently involved in the game out of all three (i.e. in both phases) and at the time seemed to me to be their most important player. Even in the 3-1 against England when Van Basten bagged a hatrick it was Gullit who stood out to me with his two assists and overall contribution to the game.
Given the sheer ability of Pele, Ronaldo and Gullit (who not surprisingly has gone under the radar yet again),
hanks @RedTiger for introducing me to these draft things and of course to @antohan and @The Stain, I had a lot of fun, learnt a lot and I'll be participating often in these. Good job guys
Hiden played a blinder against England, iirc. Which was why Chapman wanted him: Saved everything the likes of Dixie Dean threw (or kicked, or headed) at him.
He was known as a quick and physically imposing player who got the better of big, strong forwards (he was considered excellent in the area). Which further explains Chapman's interest. He would have been a good fit for the fast paced and physical English game.
Matthäus won that for @Joga Bonito. As dominant as Keane, but with a greater goal threat. Lucho on steroids, basically @Moby
@Joga Bonito is Pele Kryptonite. I remember in the 40s draft when even Pele-Muller partnership couldn't win the game against him. Actually come to think of it, I don't remember Pele winning a crunch draft game ever, which is bonkers.
Well played both mangers, it was really interesting to follow.
Ohh penalties !! and a misleading score line.That partnership won mate, albeit the match itself being a close one.
I think he was still all those things in 70s world cup, to lesser extent ofcourse. He had to take a more important role in the team and be more of a playmaker, and his physical stats naturally declined, but he was hardly a different player or a static playmaker though. I watched a lot of Pele games when I thought I scored him , and I honestly didn't see a difference which is markedly different than what other players go through. Here is for example a small highlight from 70 WC -I watched the '58 final some day ago and he was a different beast there compared to the '70 one. He had none of the smooth playmaking tendencies at that age and relied on just being way too naturally gifted. The Swedes had just put on a masterclass performance defensively against Soviet and beat them with 2-0 so their defense was strong. But his combination of strength, balance and a world class first touch saw him penetrate the Swedish defense almost at will through out the game.
He'd receive a ball faced towards his own goal, get hit by a monster tackle but he kept the balance just enough to stay in control of the ball, whether it was bouncing around or not and then he would try to get past them or set up a teammate. Wasn't none of that smooth playmaking qualities of his latter years shining through. Was sort of a one man attack.
Ohh penalties !! and a misleading score line.
Was talking about the 40s draft final.Penos?
Cheers for that info Chester, any other interesting material on him in English?
Doesn't seem to be, I'm afraid. Most sites just quote the same passage (which mentions the Chapman thing without elaborating).
German sites have considerably more information about him. He was - in short - considered as one of the best keepers around 1930. What that tells us about him is another matter.
Clearly first rate at the time and described as strong, fast and tough (he was known for bullying opposition strikers). The only directly «modern» trait of his I can find is his height - he was fairly tall, listed as 1.84/1.85.
Doesn't seem to have that «progressive» reputation which often makes pre-Yashin keepers stand out when they're lauded as greats.
He is generally very highly rated, though.
PS The match referred to above was a 0-0 affair with England in 1930, apparently an absolute phantom performance by your man which no doubt would have boosted his reputation significantly.
Ohh penalties !! and a misleading score line.
I think he was still all those things in 70s world cup, to lesser extent ofcourse. He had to take a more important role in the team and be more of a playmaker, and his physical stats naturally declined, but he was hardly a different player or a static playmaker though. I watched a lot of Pele games when I thought I scored him , and I honestly didn't see a difference which is markedly different than what other players go through. Here is for example a small highlight from 70 WC -