Chief123
Full Member
- Joined
- Dec 27, 2013
- Messages
- 12,898
It said Leeds Utd had been in touch with Seskos agent but he refused to discuss as Man Utd was the priority right now.Deleted now. What was the tweet?
It said Leeds Utd had been in touch with Seskos agent but he refused to discuss as Man Utd was the priority right now.Deleted now. What was the tweet?
You know we will though. We’ll be haggling over a few million whilst another club swoops in and pays up.I really hope we don’t cock this one up.
I really hope we don’t cock this one up.
We still had 4 when we played 442We also used to play 442. Generally I think you could get by fine with two bona fide strikers. We've got none though.
How does it not make sense? We have an injury prone martial who had been out of form for more than a year, looked more like himself in preseason but pulled a hamstring, and a nearly 38 year old. How do we NOT need to increase the depth there. He’s 19 he won’t expect to play every matchEh it doesn't make sense if Ronaldo stays. You want 2 players per position. When Sir Alex was here, it was 442, so you needed 4 strikers. We have 2 because we play 1 striker. We should have 4 wingers, but we have 2, that's the bigger issue.
Exactly! I mean, if we had bought Šeško at the start of the window, he would probably start the opening game of the season because of Martials injury and Ronaldo not match fit. Furthermore, Šeško is a different profile to any other striker options we have and even just by that he would be useful if we want to change it up a bit.How does it not make sense? We have an injury prone martial who had been out of form for more than a year, looked more like himself in preseason but pulled a hamstring, and a nearly 38 year old. How do we NOT need to increase the depth there. He’s 19 he won’t expect to play every match
All of that completely ignores the benefits of forward planning rather than reactively trying to replace players when they leave. It totally makes sense to bring in a talented young forward nowEh it doesn't make sense if Ronaldo stays. You want 2 players per position. When Sir Alex was here, it was 442, so you needed 4 strikers. We have 2 because we play 1 striker. We should have 4 wingers, but we have 2, that's the bigger issue.
I get that people want a winger, a rb and so on, but this signing is also needed. We don’t know how many games we can get out of the other 2. I really don’t want to see Rashford as number 9. He wasn’t good there.Exactly! I mean, if we had bought Šeško at the start of the window, he would probably start the opening game of the season because of Martials injury and Ronaldo not match fit. Furthermore, Šeško is a different profile to any other striker options we have and even just by that he would be useful if we want to change it up a bit.
We still had 4 when we played 442
I don't think RR or ETH is shit. It's simply impossible to play any good, energetic modern pressing football with the current 37 yo Ronaldo. That is the biggest reason all coaches/ top clubs refuse him when his agent whoring him all over Europe this summer.Are you saying EtH is as shit as RR then?
Oh I get you nowYes, the point I was making. You have twice what you can start. So when we play with one striker it makes sense to have two in the squad (at least). If we had four strikers that would be like our stockpiling of defenders though.
One of those strikers is an injury russian roulette that also needs to provide cover on the left wing while the second striker is 38 and would ditch us at the most convenient opportunity for himself. Sesko would be third choice striker and would probably get plenty of minutes. Not sure who the fourth striker you're thinking of is but I don't think it would be overkill in any way to have another as unlikely as that is given other transfer priorities.Yes, the point I was making. You have twice what you can start. So when we play with one striker it makes sense to have two in the squad (at least). If we had four strikers that would be like our stockpiling of defenders though.
100%, don’t get why a lot of people are saying we don’t need a bench warmer. We need quality depth and if that includes some good players being on the bench then so be it. City have a ton of quality bench warmers. We need a quality squad to compete not just team.With the state of our strikers (Martial and Ronaldo) and considering the 5 substitution rule, this guy would get a ton of playing time here.
Good video but 1 minor gripe
everytime you mention Haaland I hear it like Holland
it should be more Haa-land
Have you listened to the clip? You’re suggesting it’s more like Hall-land which is similar to @RaeesIt’s not Haa-land, more like A inn the word All.
Have you listened to the clip?
Which is the point that ETH has made several times too, we need squad depth100%, don’t get why a lot of people are saying we don’t need a bench warmer. We need quality depth and if that includes some good players being on the bench then so be it. City have a ton of quality bench warmers. We need a quality squad to compete not just team.
Fair enough, is the guy doing the names on YouTube wrong then?I am Norwegian so I know.
Murtogh has met his agent, definitely once, rumoured more than once. We signed amad and pellestri of a handful of minutes worth anything. Hannibal hadn't even played first team football. Think it's quite common for us now to be honest!Don’t know if it’s me being pessimistic but I think our name is being thrown about here with no concrete interest. I think we should be after a forward, but a 19 year old in Austrian league doesn’t seem very us. It would it it’s is loaning him back for a year but we need someone now.
I’d love him here as he seems like a top talent but I just don’t see it materialising.
Fair enough, is the guy doing the names on YouTube wrong then?
Have you listened to the clip? You’re suggesting it’s more like Hall-land which is similar to @Raees
Thanks for clarifying, every days a school day. Apologies to @RaeesYeah. We do tend to us aa rather than å when we are signing papers abroad or even using our name abroad. But that’s more about å not being used in other lands.
The pronunciation would be as we do it here anyways. But people not using æ ø å will find it hard and they use a o e instead.
It would be correct to pronounce his name H"All"and.
Wow! That’s fantastic! Does that also mean he’s reading Redcafe?Not sure I’ll let you guys determine what is best way to say it. In other news I’ve received a DM off Sesko himself on instagram giving some feedback on the video!!
Good feedback of course, right?Not sure I’ll let you guys determine what is best way to say it. In other news I’ve received a DM off Sesko himself on instagram giving some feedback on the video!!
Yeah, he is.Fair enough, is the guy doing the names on YouTube wrong then?
Good feedback of course, right?
That price for a pure striker when we have 2 others who play the lone striker position? I'm all for sesko, but if he comes, to me that's clearly a Ronaldo replacement. I could see us signing him and loaning him back for a year, but the only reason he would come now would be to replace Ronaldo imo. I just don't see having more than 2 players in 1 position as a smart tactic, you always end up with unhappy players. And we have other areas to address before we reach that point.How does it not make sense? We have an injury prone martial who had been out of form for more than a year, looked more like himself in preseason but pulled a hamstring, and a nearly 38 year old. How do we NOT need to increase the depth there. He’s 19 he won’t expect to play every match
Let's hope he makes it through the newbie systemWow! That’s fantastic! Does that also mean he’s reading Redcafe?
JOIN US SESKO!!