Kaos
Full Member
Had the misfortune of listening to his verbal diarrhea on net neutrality. Just confirms he's nothing more than a charlatan contrarian who channels anti-PC rhetoric for traction.
I'll be as clear as humanely possible: No. It. Is. Not. Please cut that shit out.
As for why homosexuality is brought into the equation, it too was once seen as a mental illness that could be treated.
And the idea that being gay has little to no adverse impact is, quite frankly, laughable. Yes, it's a lot easier than it used to be, but gay people stoll have to deal with a lot of shit straight people don't.
Yes there is.Btw, there is another thread with the same title, perhaps merge?
As for the question of whether it's a mental illness, of course it is. Bringing homosexuality into the equation to refute that makes no sense. In this day and age, unless you or your parents are very religious, being gay has little to no adverse impact on your self esteem or quality of life. In the west it would seem to correlate to a better quality of life, at least for men. The same obviously cannot be said for gender dysphoria, which has a similar impact on suicide attempt rates as severe clinical depression.
As for the question of whether it's a mental illness, of course it is. Bringing homosexuality into the equation to refute that makes no sense. In this day and age, unless you or your parents are very religious, being gay has little to no adverse impact on your self esteem or quality of life. In the west it would seem to correlate to a better quality of life, at least for men. The same obviously cannot be said for gender dysphoria, which has a similar impact on suicide attempt rates as severe clinical depression.
It is actually. I'm also a qualified expert in calling a spade a spade and asserting that ducks go quack.
No.
No. But thankfully for those with gender dysphoria the qualified expert brigade (incidentally, how can you become a qualified expert in this field?) have deemed it a mental disorder. Since you seemed to ignore the rest of my post you might have missed the point about how you might go about financing treatment for things that are *NOT AN ILLNESS* .
Hasan Piker had a good take on Shapiro.
Where do those who don't experience dysphoria but keep their transgender status a secret as much as possible fit in to Dr Hobs definitions? It's unclear how they are encompassed in those descriptions.But genuine transsexuals all suffer from gender dysphoria.
Unless we're branching into the far more murky depths of transtrenders, of pretending there is a different gender for every individual and we can swap between them all whenever we like. Those people aren't mentally ill, just seeking attention and/or a way to feel unique.
I just knew he'd be in favour of revoking Net neutrality.. but it's nice to see him getting put in his place.
I do love how he buys into the same fecking argument that practically every fecker defending this has brought into that before 2015 there was no net neutrality and the internet was fine, that's incredibly far from the truth..
I'd be interested to see what his view on Trump/Tax Bill/Guns / Healthcare.. oh wait, I imagine I could probably fecking guess.
I have a possible explanation for these. It's that some people like gender roles and some don't, trans or otherwise. And, as a result, some feminists, being people and all, like gender roles and some don't.This results in those women feeling like they don't belong in their own body because a typical female doesn't represent how they think or behave, and vice versa. Should we not be trying to rid our society of these feminine and masculine expectations, rather than opening up a new category of identification for people who better associate with the opposite sex based on said social pressure/expectations?
Funnily enough, feminism was working towards removing the masculine and feminine expectations placed on men and women. Their support of the transgender movement almost seems to be a complete u-turn on this, where they're supporting women who feel the "typical man" stereotypes better fit who they are as a person, so they in fact must be a man.
I'm a third wave feminist and a trans rights activist, so I can agree these positions can coincide.I see what you're saying, but I'm talking about the vocal third wave feminist lobby that blame everything on the patriarchy and have a fondness for virtue signalling. This is a group with a very clearly defined set of views, you'll never get 100% agreement on every single detail, but this is a group that are not in favour of gender roles and societal pressures (when it suits them of course - they've shown themselves to be massive hypocrites on a number of issues).
This is the same group who are so vocal in their support of the transgender movement. They just don't realise the contradiction. I can't say I'm surprised, rational thought and logic was never their strong point.
Yes, I want specifics, so I can see if 'myself' - someone subscribes to such labels - has any contradictory views that I cannot explain.Exactly what I said in my original post that you quoted.
It seems evident to me there's a massive overlap of people who hold both sets of views.
Where do those who don't experience dysphoria but keep their transgender status a secret as much as possible fit in to Dr Hobs definitions? It's unclear how they are encompassed in those descriptions.
That's the key. We all experience stress to some degree, on all number of bases. For some it is severe enough to be classed as a medical condition. For many it is not.From what I have read gender dysphoria is the discomfort felt from trying to identify or being identified as your biological sex when that isn't who you are. Surely every trans person must experience dysphoria to some degree if that's true no? Or is that not the whole definition?
I meant in the eyes of society in general, but yeah, there are still narrow-minded cnuts around.It still is seen that way by some pretty powerful people to a certain extent; Mike Pence has been supportive of conversion therapy before. The man who's a scandal away from being the world's most powerful political figure.
Gender dysphoria is not required to qualify as transgendered, but it's true that most suffer from it to some extent. This does not allow you to sweepingly declare that transgendered people are mentally ill or delusional the way Shapiro does.But genuine transsexuals all suffer from gender dysphoria.
That's the key. We all experience stress to some degree, on all number of bases. For some it is severe enough to be classed as a medical condition. For many it is not.
I am saying many trans people's stress is not remotely akin to dysphoria but is more akin to the everyday worries we all have. Some of us suffer hugely with dysphoria and it is accurate to view this as a mental illness, some just suffer mild or moderate stress and it is not legitimate to view their stress as a medical condition just because other people struggle with it more.I don't know if I follow that logic, I understand what you are saying but surely for example if you suffer from depression to any degree then you still have depression. I think comparing dysphoria with general stress would be like comparing say postnatal depression with sadness, when both depression and dysphoria would be more specific and serious. I am not sure I did a good job of explaining what I am getting at, long day.
I am saying many trans people's stress is not remotely akin to dysphoria but is more akin to the everyday worries we all have. Some of us suffer hugely with dysphoria and it is accurate to view this as a mental illness, some just suffer mild or moderate stress and it is not legitimate to view their stress as a medical condition just because other people struggle with it more.
Same as any mental health issue. When it is severely effecting your ability to live your life.Where would you say the line is? I know it is hard to summarize.
Same as any mental health issue. When it is severely effecting your ability to live your life.
We should lessen gender stereotypes, because we have previously made them too rigid, but respect the fact that some people find gender concepts enriching, including many feminists and trans people, and me.No, the bit you quoted and gave an explanation for.
Basically, the view that we should eliminate gender masculine/feminine stereotypes and the view that societal pressures on how men/women should act, feel and behave are unfair and damaging.
And then the view that if a woman feels she better identifies with masculine stereotypes and how society says a man should act, feel and behave, then she is in fact a man.
It is and as such it is only for professionals to diagnose."Severely" is so subjective which is one of the problems we still have with diagnosing mental health problems. I was actually talking to someone I work with today about how strange it is that we completely overrate our understanding of mental health when we have only really seriously acknowledged it for a few decades, if that.
I understand that explanation but for example there are countless extremely high functioning people who suffer with depression, bipolar and so on.
I like most, to be honest. I think, as a crude example, that there is truth to the idea the females tend to be more empathetic whilst males more competitive, and I see the good and bad in both and the link to sex hormones that said gender assumptions are grounded in.Fair enough. What gender concepts do you like and think we should keep?
I just knew he'd be in favour of revoking Net neutrality.. but it's nice to see him getting put in his place.
I do love how he buys into the same fecking argument that practically every fecker defending this has brought into that before 2015 there was no net neutrality and the internet was fine, that's incredibly far from the truth..
I'd be interested to see what his view on Trump/Tax Bill/Guns / Healthcare.. oh wait, I imagine I could probably fecking guess.
This guy doesn't deserve his own thread.
Facts don't care about your feelings