Valencia and Ronaldo were right wingers. Young was never going to replace Ryan Giggs. He was always squad player material. You can't compare spitty with the likes of Vidal or Xabi Alonso, two world class articles who competed for Bastian for a first team place.
Players tend to be very good to understand the signs of time. Take Gaz for example who only retired following an humiliating last game. He's not alone. Baresi needed a humiliated performance in the derby to call it a day while Keane went feral, accusing everyone and everybody about United's issues when in reality the problem was him (we replaced him with Carrick and voila we won the league again). Bastian might have thought that he could still make it at the top level and that he shouldn't settle for just a reserve/honorary role. If he must settle for that role, he might as well do it on a rival club's payroll not on his beloved club one. I can't blame him for that especially since he was encouraged by United's manager to think like that with United throwing money at him just to leave Bayern. It turned out that both the manager and the player were dinasours
Ultimately Bayern got rid of a burden (which they were willing to carry but it was still a burden) and Bastian carved himself a great deal for himself at a club whose just a step away from home. Why should he move to the other side of the world when he's happy with the money United are obliged to pay him?
Just to be perfectly clear here, just because Schweinsteiger played (and played well IMO) doesn't mean that anyone here thinks we're sorted for the Carrick role. In fact, I bet if you started a poll asking the Caf that very question, I doubt more than 1-2% would say yes. And even that would be purely because of the opposition fans on here having a bit of fun. So if you're gonna make that argument, save it.
With that said, I'm really struggling to see why you've taken your Schweinsteiger is a waste of time position. Our performances this season seem to indicate 4-3-3 with Herrera and Pogba flanking Carrick is our best team. Now, Carrick is deservedly first choice here, but he's also 35 years old and so, can't play every game. Fellaini and Herrera have both shown themselves to be uncomfortable in the Carrick role, while Schweinsteiger has just had a very good game in that role. Would he be able to replicate that same level against a Premier League team? I don't know, but his performance was encouraging and till he actually plays a league game, we can't be sure. I have my doubts, but he showed at the Euros that he does still have the ability. He started knockout games against Italy and France and did well. The game against Italy was a very cagey one and although he wasn't that great, and Ozil was the one who produced Germany's goal IIRC, in a game where both teams were struggling to impose themselves, him and Toni Kroos seemed to be the only players still capable of keeping possession. Against France, he gave away a stupid penalty, but he absolutely ran the game and completely dominated a midfield of Matuidi and the soon-to-be most expensive player in the world. So, he may yet surprise us.
That said, even if it doesn't pan out well, he seems a more than capable deputy to Carrick for simpler games where we need to rest players. Why you can't just look at his performance and give him credit for a good game (and that isn't just me speaking; he was voted MOTM here, was voted MOTM in the post game twitter poll that United do, and was also MOTM according to the WhoScored performance index) is beyond me. I mean he's here for the rest of the season and getting paid for it, so we might as well use him when we need to, right?
As for the being a burden on Bayern thing, that isn't really true. I mean yeah he was having a lot of injury problems, particularly in his knees and ankles, but he was playing when fit. You keep mentioning the fact that Bayern were buying central midfielders yet conveniently ignore that he was starting above these players.
He was obviously instrumental in the treble winning season, and in the season after, when Pep Guardiola took over is when his injury problems started. Even then, with him being available for 25 of the 34 match days in the Bundesliga, he started 23 games, coming in as a substitute in another. This includes games against Dortmund, Leverkusen, Gladbach, Wolfsburg and Schalke (only mentioning the better teams here). He also started all the group stage games in the Champions League except for 2 against CSKA and Manchester City where he was out with an ankle injury. Also missed the away leg against Arsenal but started at home, started against us but missed the return leg due to a red card, and then started against Real Madrid where as you may remember, Bayern got hammered and knocked out.
In 14/15, he started the season injured with a Patella problem and missed the first 11 match weeks in the Bundesliga. He was still involved in 20 league games (missed a further 2 due to a tear), starting 15, including games against Dortmund, Wolfsburg, Leverkusen, Gladbach and Mainz. Him and Alonso both started in games against Hoffenheim, Hertha, Leverkusen, Augsburg, Freiburg (these are games in succession), Wolfsburg, Schalke and Stuttgart with Alonso missing a match in between against Mainz due to injury. After Stuttgart, Alonso missed another game due to injury against Hamburg (Schweinsteiger started) and then they both again started against Koln, Gladbach, Leverkusen and Dortmund but I think you get the point by now. In fact, him and Alonso both starting was one of the complaints many Bayern fans had because their games didn't complement each other: they both wanted to receive the ball from the defence and dictate the game.
In the Champions League, Schweinsteiger did start against Shakhtar, Porto and Barcelona in the knockout games, missed most of the group stage games due to injury.
So tell me, with Bayern buying so many midfield players, Schweinsteiger being such a "burden" and Pep playing the likes of Lahm and Alaba in midfield, how did he manage to start so many games? The simplest explanation seems to me to be that Pep felt that with Schweinsteiger's injury problems mounting, he could no longer be first choice, Schweinsteiger probably felt that United were a good chance to test himself in another league, at a famous club that he admired (I'm sure you've seen the photo of a young Schweinsteiger in a United shirt that his brother posted on Twitter), with good wages and with a coach he liked. Taking all factors into consideration, both probably felt that it was a good idea to part ways. Your post makes it seem like Bayern were desperate to get rid and were laughing all the way to the bank after they conned us into signing him.
Vidal was of course, bought the season Schweinsteiger moved on, so can't really comment on what their roles might have been.
In case you were interested, these are according to WhoScored, Bayern's most common line up in the Bundesliga in 2013/14:
Neuer
Rafinha-Dante-Boateng-Alaba
Lahm
Schweinsteiger-Kroos
Muller-Mandzukic-Ribery
Their most common line-up in the Bundesliga in 2014/15:
Neuer
Rafinha-Dante-Boateng-Bernat
Alonso-Lahm-Schweinsteiger
Muller-Lewandowski-Gotze
Their second most common line-up in 2014/15:
Neuer
Rafinha-Boateng-Batstuber-Bernat
Schweinsteiger-Alaba
Robben-Gotze-Ribery
Lewandowski
Though the second one was only used 4 times and Pep's Bayern changed starting 11s regularly so isn't really much to speak about. The point is Bastian Schweinsteiger was still very much a wanted member of the Bayern squad.
The truth is blindingly obvious anyway
@devilish, Bastian had his share of injuries and Bayern responded by strengthening. Alonso especially was a typical Guardiola signing.
Rather than take the
easy legend route, Schweinsteiger took on a challenge, and it's backfired.
But to claim he did it to be nice to Bayern, or because he knew he was finished (more reason to stay and be bit part in a winning machine), is as I've said many times, deluded beyond belief.
Yep, it seems to me a strange suggestion that he simply came to United for the retirement money after Bayern pushed him out. Even leaving aside that he mist be quite wealthy given that he was a regular starter at one of the biggest clubs in the world and the numerous sponsorship deals with Adidas and Audi that came with it, surely going to the US was an easier retirement option? And even if we accept that he only wants the money, why keep working in training and fight your way back into the team if that's the case? He could've just sat on his arse when he was told he won't be considered for the first team. He was going to get paid regardless, and if United wanted him out they would've had to pay him compensation for terminating his contract. I feel like
@devilish is getting his feelings about the Schweinsteiger situation and overpaid football players get in the way of his objective assessment.