Had to double take seeing Adam Beyer's name in this thread
Hehe...yeah I guess he's a bit of a science fan. #Drumcode
Had to double take seeing Adam Beyer's name in this thread
https://phys.org/news/2019-01-astronomers-star-material-block-life.html#jCpAn organic molecule detected in the material from which a star forms could shed light on how life emerged on Earth, according to new research led by Queen Mary University of London. The researchers report the first ever detection of glycolonitrile (HOCH2CN), a pre-biotic molecule which existed before the emergence of life, in a solar-type protostar known as IRAS16293-2422 B.
This warm and dense region contains young stars at the earliest stage of their evolution surrounded by a cocoon of dust and gas—similar conditions to those when our Solar System formed. Detecting pre-biotic molecules in solar-type protostars enhances our understanding of how the solar system formed as it indicates that planets created around the star could begin their existence with a supply of the chemical ingredients needed to make some form of life.
This finding, published in the journal Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters, is a significant step forward for pre-biotic astrochemistry since glycolonitrile is recognised as a key precursor towards the formation of adenine, one of the nucleobases that form both DNA and RNA in living organisms. IRAS16293-2422 B is a well-studied protostar in the constellation of Ophiuchus, in a region of star formation known as rho Ophiuchi, about 450 light-years from Earth.
The Rho Ophiuchi star formation region. Credit: ESO/Digitized Sky Survey 2. Acknowledgement: Davide De Martin
The research was also carried out with the Centro de Astrobiología in Spain, INAF-Osservatorio Astrofisico di Arcetri in Italy, the European Southern Observatory, and the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics in the USA. Lead author Shaoshan Zeng, from Queen Mary University of London, said: "We have shown that this important pre-biotic molecule can be formed in the material from which stars and planets emerge, taking us a step closer to identifying the processes that may have led to the origin of life on Earth."
The researchers used data from the Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimetre Array (ALMA) telescope in Chile to uncover evidence for the presence of glycolonitrile in the material from which the star is forming—known as the interstellar medium.
Glycolonitrile Credit: Víctor M. Rivilla & Ben Mills & Herschel-SPIRE 500 microns
With the ALMA data, they were able to identify the chemical signatures of glycolonitrile and determine the conditions in which the molecule was found. They also followed this up by using chemical modelling to reproduce the observed data which allowed them to investigate the chemical processes that could help to understand the origin of this molecule. This follows the earlier detection of methyl isocyanate in the same object by researchers from Queen Mary. Methyl isocyanate is what is known as an isomer of glycolonitrile—it is made up of the same atoms but in a slightly different arrangement, meaning it has different chemical properties.
This is truly fascinating to me and should be drawing media attention.
Stunning, it's like artwork.
Are the original photos in colour or is colour added based on some image processing algorithms? They look absolutely incredible.
NASA photos are usually heavily edited when it comes to colour. Possibly is that colour but nowhere near as intense.
Yes I suspected as much, but perfectly understandable given the difficulty in getting to these planets.
It's more to show the different features than anything nefarious, too. It's the same with photographs of objects beyond our galaxy. Galaxies can be quite colourful and beautiful, but not quite as colourful as portrayed in images from NASA (and others)... to us. They don't strictly make stuff up, though, they just colour light that isn't visible to humans, but which is just as real as the light we can see.
Unless you're looking for niche content, the quintet of Astronomy Magazine (generalized news), Bad Astronomer aka Phil Plait (one of the most active commentators and popular explainers around), Emily Lakdawala (not the best on her own but retweets a lot of good stuff), Astronomy Picture Of The Day (self explanatory) and SPACEdotcom (aggregator/news account) should more than cover your astronomy-info needs.What are the best space related Twitter accounts? I might clear everything and actually make it worth using.
Unless you're looking for niche content, the quintet of Astronomy Magazine (generalized news), Bad Astronomer aka Phil Plait (one of the most active commentators and popular explainers around), Emily Lakdawala (not the best on her own but retweets a lot of good stuff), Astronomy Picture Of The Day (self explanatory) and SPACEdotcom (aggregator/news account) should more than cover your astronomy-info needs.
You're right — there are known comets that traverse beyond from the Kuiper Belt (e.g. K2 was discovered at 16 AU but has an aphelion of about 45000 AU), and the Oort Cloud is theorized to be 5,000-10,0000 AU away (compared with just ~140 AU for FarFarOut), but the latter is the furthest trans-Neptunian object that is being monitored right now and a dwarf planet with an estimated diameter of ~250 miles (which puts it in a different class to comets), at least according to the initial calculations/reports. Worth bearing in mind that FarFarOut's orbit hasn't even been derived yet — it could go even further away on a hyperbola (for reference, 90377 Sedna has an aphelion of almost 1,000 AU...about 13 times greater than its distance at closest approach: ~75 AU)...Huh, that's not quite right. There are known comets that are much further out than 140 AU. They must not be counting comets, I guess.
The solar system really is fecking big. By some measures it might even be said to reach as far as half-way to Proxima Centauri.
So - if a rogue Jupiter sized planet passed through the Solar System (entirely possible) and interacted with Earth, pulling it onto an escape velocity trajectory out of the Solar System also (entirely possible), doing so without breaking up Earth's mantle and crust (I'm less sure that that's possible but go with it)...
How long could humans survive?
Bear in mind we'd probably have a decade to prepare.