- Joined
- Mar 22, 2014
- Messages
- 15,419
- Supports
- Piracy on the High Seas.
Cassini returned some images of Saturn's giant hurricane. I'm a bit confused though, is the hexagonal storm distinct from this one?
Cassini returned some images of Saturn's giant hurricane. I'm a bit confused though, is the hexagonal storm distinct from this one?
The hexagon is at the pole (and mental).
Very interesting, thanks for the responses! Very interested to see what other cool stuff we'll get to see from Cassini.That is just a regular hurricane (not to be conflated by the North Pole Vortex) - Saturn has loads of them, as you can see from this image:
eg. This is the Dragon Storm:
This is the lightning storm in the 'Lightning Alley':
This is the South Polar Vortex:
This is the Hexagon at the North Pole (which you were referring to):
And this is an interpretation of the Eye of the Hexagonal Vortex:
Very interesting, thanks for the responses! Very interested to see what other cool stuff we'll get to see from Cassini.
Humans must leave Earth in 100 years to survive: Stephen Hawking
In a new BBC series, Prof. Hawking claims that time is running out for the Earth and humanity.
Humans will need to colonise another planet within the next 100 years to survive climate change, asteroid strikes and overpopulation, according to renowned British physicist Stephen Hawking.
In a documentary, Expedition New Earth — part of the BBC’s new science season Tomorrow’s World — Prof. Hawking and his former student Christophe Galfard will travel the world to find out how humans could survive in outer space.
In the series, Prof. Hawking claims that time is running out for the Earth and humanity will need to leave the planet for its survival.
The shows aims to find Britain’s greatest invention, by asking the public to vote on the innovation which has been the most influential in their lives, The Telegraph reported.
Last month, Prof. Hawking had warned that the aggressive instincts of humans, coupled with the fast pace of growth in technology may destroy us all by nuclear or biological war, adding that only a ‘world government’ may prevent this impending doom.
Prof. Hawking had said that humans may lack the skills as a species to stay alive.
Great read! Susskind really has a cool way of making complex things accessible and engaging (and even a wee bit humorous) for casual readers without being dragged down by the mathematics intensive details. His interactive Susskind Lectures series on Youtube is great, too - deals with a variety of subjects, and makes a lot of interesting stuff available to the masses:I'm reading Leonard Susskind's The Black Hole Wars right now. Talks about his challenge to Hawking's Black Hole work.
Refuse to believe that Jupiter isn't painted.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/busi...3e1494-49f7-11e7-987c-42ab5745db2e_story.html
Complete reuseability draws every closer.
... and they called themselves scientists.... maybe because the universe is so fecking big and with billions of solar systems separated by light year distances is like "let me go for a ride to that solar system in our galaxy that's 2000 LY, see you in 4000 years (using our years)"http://www.iflscience.com/space/hib...plain-why-we-havent-found-any-other-life-yet/
Hibernating Aliens May Explain Why We Haven't Found Any Other Life Yet
Scientists have proposed a rather interesting reason for why we haven’t found aliens yet, a problem known as the Fermi Paradox (if life is so abundant, where is everyone?). They propose intelligent aliens could be in a state of hibernation, waiting for the universe to get colder so they can be more productive.
This idea was proposed in the Journal of the British Interplanetary Society, with a pre-print available on arXiv. The paper was written by Anders Sandberg, Stuart Armstrong, and Milan Cirkovic of the Future of Humanity Institute at the University of Oxford, and picked up recently by Gizmodo.
Some people think that a civilization much more advanced than our own might become a digital race. That is to say, they’ll live as artificial intelligence inside computers, doing away with more limiting fleshy bodies. Experts including Elon Musk have suggested this is a logical progression in the far future.
If we are not alone in the universe (which we have no evidence for yet), one could therefore further propose that an advanced alien race might have gone down this route. But in order to make the most of their new digital bodies, they might not like the universe at the moment.
The temperature of the universe right now is 3 degrees Kelvin above absolute zero. That’s rather chilly, but that temperature will continue to drop as the universe expands. Sandberg and his colleagues argue that the temperature in the future could allow for 1030 more computational processes than are currently possible.
“We hence suggest the 'aestivation hypothesis',” the researchers write in their paper, adding that “the reason we are not observing manifestations of alien civilizations is that they are currently (mostly) inactive, patiently waiting for future cosmic eras.” Aestivation is basically hibernation to avoid hotter temperatures, not cooler ones.
An advanced digital alien race might get to the point where they have fully explored a section of the universe. Finding no need to continue existence with a relatively limited processing power (processing becomes 10 times more efficient if your computer is 10 times colder), they may therefore choose to wait for a cooler age in the universe.
The authors do not necessarily think this theory is correct, not least because we have no evidence we are not alone yet. But they argue that if it turns out there is other life out there, then the theory is at least a possibility.
“[We] personally think the likeliest reason we are not seeing aliens is not that they are aestivating, but just that they do not exist or are very far away,” Sandberg wrote in a blog post. “If that hypothesis [life is rare] is not true, then aestivation is a pretty plausible answer in my personal opinion.”
What’s more, they propose a way to find aestivating aliens. If we can see unusual phenomena in the universe, such as stars failing to collapse into black holes, this might be evidence of aliens using up the energy. And if there are aliens monitoring our particular corner of the universe, then any attempts by us to travel outwards may be met with hostile resistance.
This theory will not be without its detractors. Science fiction author David Brin, for one, suggested to Gizmodo that it made little sense for a race to go into hibernation and waste processing time. The authors countered that any race would want to make the most of available energy, and thus wait for optimal conditions.
There’s no shortage of speculation these days about the Fermi Paradox, and the possibility of alien life. The fact remains though that – to paraphrase Arthur C. Clarke – we are either alone or not, and both answers are equally terrifying. Maybe, if we’re not, then there just might be sleeping aliens waiting for things to get a bit cooler.
I think the real reason, is the "many small filters". Something that isn't normally talked about.... and they called themselves scientists.... maybe because the universe is so fecking big and with billions of solar systems separated by light year distances is like "let me go for a ride to that solar system in our galaxy that's 2000 LY, see you in 4000 years (using our years)"
Cooler parts of the corona, according to the website. I'm guessing they'll steer clear of the dense plasma zones for obvious reasons - no experimental material can withstand even a hundredth of the emissions and average temperatures at the chromosphere-corona transition region with large scale helium ionization.Atmosphere?
https://www.nasa.gov/content/goddard/parker-solar-probe-humanity-s-first-visit-to-a-starFlying into the outermost part of the sun's atmosphere, known as the corona, for the first time, Parker Solar Probe will employ a combination of in situ measurements and imaging to revolutionize our understanding of the corona and expand our knowledge of the origin and evolution of the solar wind. It will also make critical contributions to our ability to forecast changes in Earth's space environment that affect life and technology on Earth.
To perform these unprecedented investigations, the spacecraft and instruments will be protected from the sun’s heat by a 4.5-inch-thick (11.43 cm) carbon-composite shield, which will need to withstand temperatures outside the spacecraft that reach nearly 2,500 F (1,377 C).
https://phys.org/news/2017-06-evidence-stars-born-pairs.htmlDid our sun have a twin when it was born 4.5 billion years ago?
Almost certainly yes—though not an identical twin. And so did every other sunlike star in the universe, according to a new analysis by a theoretical physicist from UC Berkeley and a radio astronomer from the Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory at Harvard University.
Many stars have companions, including our nearest neighbor, Alpha Centauri, a triplet system. Astronomers have long sought an explanation. Are binary and triplet star systems born that way? Did one star capture another? Do binary stars sometimes split up and become single stars?
Astronomers have even searched for a companion to our sun, a star dubbed Nemesis because it was supposed to have kicked an asteroid into Earth's orbit that collided with our planet and exterminated the dinosaurs. It has never been found.
The new assertion is based on a radio survey of a giant molecular cloud filled with recently formed stars in the constellation Perseus, and a mathematical model that can explain the Perseus observations only if all sunlike stars are born with a companion.
"We are saying, yes, there probably was a Nemesis, a long time ago," said co-author Steven Stahler, a UC Berkeley research astronomer.
"We ran a series of statistical models to see if we could account for the relative populations of young single stars and binaries of all separations in the Perseus molecular cloud, and the only model that could reproduce the data was one in which all stars form initially as wide binaries. These systems then either shrink or break apart within a million years."
In all seriousness though how can the BBC turn out such crap with the money they have, compared to this?