It's pretty clear that most of them haven't sent Mkhitaryan play for a few years or maybe ever, given how highly they rate him. They have seemingly collectively decided that Sanchez wasn't that good and that Mkhitaryan will easily replace him, which is 'head the clouds' thinking based on the past few years.
Even if you were being charitable and said Mkhitaryan will thrive under Wenger, with more freedom to express his talents, he's still nowhere near as good as Sanchez. And if he doesn't improve, the meltdown will be hilarious when they realise they've been had, especially if Sanchez is great for us.
And the party line of "if we get Aubameyang and Mkhitaryan for Sanchez and Walcott, it's great business" is a bit strange too. Sanchez and Mkhitaryan cancel each other out and even of you offset Walcott from the fee, you're still talking about paying out £40m or so (well a lot more if the trend of signing on fees, wages and agent cuts are added).
It's possible they might be a better overall team if that happens but it'll be because they've spent big on a potentially great player for them - I think they'll probably be around the same level if Mkhitaryan improves a bit but they'll have had to spend a huge amount of money, given how they messed up with Sanchez's contract situation. I'm not sure how that could ever be described as "great business".
