- Joined
- Nov 16, 2011
- Messages
- 808
Agreed.A decent number 9 and back up/help for Cas the priority this summer above anything else right now.That includes DeGea.
I like to crunch numbers and I've been keeping track of our results this season. Whilst sample sizes aren't massive and there are variances in fixture difficulty, let's have a look at the difference Casemiro makes to our results.
With Casemiro starting:
Without Casemiro starting:
- Played 15
- W10 D3 L2
- G23 GA16
- 66.67% win ratio
- 2.2 points per game - 83.6 points over a 38 game season
An 18 point swing takes us from being 50/50 for top four to near title challengers.
- Played 15
- W8 D2 L5
- G23 GA21
- 53.33% win ratio
- 1.73 points per game - 65.86 points over a 38 game season
An even more stark way of visualising this is with expected goal difference.
With Casemiro:
9 comfortable games, 3 relatively comfortable ones, 2 close ones and 1 battering.
Without Casemiro:
3 comfortable games, 4 relatively comfortable ones, five close ones and 3 batterings.
With Casemiro playing we have only "lost" on expected goal difference once, whereas our games without him are all tight affairs, except when we give someone a hiding: Everton (H), Leicester (H) and Leeds (H), or are on the receiving end of one: (City (A), Arsenal (A) and Newcastle (A), with both of the latter scenarios being equally likely.
On this basis, we must sign a competent, like-for-like backup to Casemiro. Given his age, someone younger, playing in a lower tier league will be a better fit from a squad harmony perspective and leave more in the tank for other positions like striker where we may need to splash out more.
They would also hit their prime at the point where you would expect Casemiro to start declining or at least need his minutes managing. A Premier League "proven" player, like Rice or Palhinha will not be happy with this role and will cost way too much.
Signing this player will make McTominay surplus to requirements as he's only really been used as a Casemiro backup this season.
Selling him will probably offset most if not all of the fee for either Maxence Caqueret or Manuel Ugarte. Both are high volume tacklers and press resistant, so would be excellent against the bigger teams. Ugarte is more of a pure DM where Caqueret is better at chance creation from open play passing. Caqueret could play with or instead of Casemiro, whilst Ugarte would be more of a like-for-like player. Either way a Casemiro backup is imperative.
Fecker missed too many games on bullshit, not injury.
He's 31.
His fitness record is fine.
Cut out the games missing because of disciplinary actions and he's there 8 out of 10 games. The other 2 games we have enough of cover for him.
Meaning - his replacement or backup is NOT a primary transfer target.
Getting a proper fecking striker is.
Break the bank for who ever the feck Erik wants.
What, you think we can just take it for granted that he's going to be able to play nearly all the time?
Nothing in life is taken for granted.
The matter of fact is that he didn't miss most of our games due injury - it was due disciplinary actions.
He has a good fitness and injury record.
Yes, i expect him to play 7 out of 10 games if taken care of properly.
Modrić has 6 years on him. With proper managment he plays most of the games.
Yeah, it's just probably not a stupid move to be prepared to deal with it if for some reason he doesn't play. This is why we have more than one good player in every other position. Lengthy injuries can happen to anyone, whatever his fitness record.
Who are they? Please don’t say Fred and McTominay.Sure.
But, you know, this ain't football
We already have 2 players on massive wages who can play Casemiro's position.
We don't have unlimited resources.
And, the biggest point - we have more pressing positions to target and spend money on.
The fact we don't have a proper striker in the club that is Manchester United is a fecking travesty.
Sure.
But, you know, this ain't football manager.
We already have 2 players on massive wages who can play Casemiro's position.
We don't have unlimited resources.
And, the biggest point - we have more pressing positions to target and spend money on.
The fact we don't have a proper striker in the club that is Manchester United is a fecking travesty.
Knowing Caicedo has just signed a new deal, he would be more expensive than Rice.Great post, I agree that a quality DM should be top priority alongside a striker if we want to challenge for the title. Hence why I’ve been spamming for us to sign Caicedo.
Worth it for the quality, longevity and versatility.Knowing caicedo has just signed a new deal, he would be more expensive than rice.
If Rice cost less then I will pick him over Caicedo.Worth it for the quality, longevity and versatility.
Fair dosIf Rice cost less then I will pick him over Caicedo.
I'd love Caicedo for this reason. I think you could play them (Casemiro and Caicedo) together with Bruno and still have enough possession and creativity to break down opponents, but when Casemiro inevitably gets banned Caicedo could slot into the deeper position and offer similar levels of defensive security.
Came on to make this pointInterested to know whether Eriksen was also unavailable for most, if not all of the games during Casemiro's absences.
What other players were unavailable?
What was the quality of opponent with/without Casemiro?
Other mitigating factors?
Obviously, any team will miss a quality player like Casemiro but I think hyperbolic statements like 'we are a one man team' are overly simplistic based just on a narrow analysis.
Interested to know whether Eriksen was also unavailable for most, if not all of the games during Casemiro's absences.
What other players were unavailable?
What was the quality of opponent with/without Casemiro?
Other mitigating factors?
Obviously, any team will miss a quality player like Casemiro but I think hyperbolic statements like 'we are a one man team' are overly simplistic based just on a narrow analysis.
Caicedo should be top target if we want to splash the cash - expect he will be £80m.
The secondary/cheaper alternatives would be Ugarte or Lavia as others have mentioned - expect they will be £40-50m - unless Lavia has a cheaper release clause.