Sandikan
aka sex on the beach
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2011
- Messages
- 55,220
It's not so much that we should definitely not have given him the job, but I think it was wrong to jump the gun. It gives the impression that a good run of games is enough to assess when it just isn't. We should have waited and weighed up his achievements. In my opinion he fell just short of doing what he needed to do to convince me he was the right person, as it turns out, though I do wonder if we had kept the position less certain, we might not have just got over the line in the race for 4th.
Ironically I distinctly remember the likes of Gary Neville saying we had to appoint him over the international break, which is exactly what we did. I don't see why, at all. It all smacks of poor leadership at the top of the club.
Like all United fans, I love Ole. I want him to be a success as our manager and I want him to be given time to rebuild the team. I hope he has it in him to do it. But do I really think he can? Probably not, especially given the way the club operates.
Hindsight is marvellous. Always.
The "Logic" if we can call it that at the time, was that he'd put an incredible run of wins in. It wasn't just a few games, it was something like 17 wins out of 20 or something incredible. Wins at all 3 big London teams, PSG etc.
The logic would have been that the earlier you confirm something, the more you can start to build from that, start scouting out players who would want to know early what they're signing up for, similar with contracts for the big players.
Obviously it's all turned for the worse for whatever reasons, but at the time it all seemed sensible, and most of us said "well deserved"