Brophs
The One and Only
- Joined
- Nov 28, 2006
- Messages
- 50,794
Nailed it.Haha you have completely friend requested that one or something
Nailed it.Haha you have completely friend requested that one or something
Antony hasn't been charged. He was interviewed yesterday for hours by police and United feel he has provided enough evidence to prove his innocence.Why aren't they using the Mason Greenwood rule with Antony? Why is Antony allowed back in the squad whilst eh investigation is still ongoing? I know arsenal have done that with a certain someone but why are united using one rule for Greenwood and another for Antony? Have the club got the balls to face up to the public backlash and the inevitable Rachel Riley tweets?
Where did I say it was? I said fair enough.Being a shitty person and a shitty boyfriend to your partners isn't a criminal offence. You can be both those things and not somebody who physically and sexually assaults people.
Antony has not been charged.Why aren't they using the Mason Greenwood rule with Antony? Why is Antony allowed back in the squad whilst eh investigation is still ongoing? I know arsenal have done that with a certain someone but why are united using one rule for Greenwood and another for Antony? Have the club got the balls to face up to the public backlash and the inevitable Rachel Riley tweets?
I'm sorry but this is just a stupid statement all round.Bad news. Don't want the scumbag back at the club!
You don't call out a doctor, your girlfriend has a ruptured implant and alleges her partner is responsible without there being some truth behind it.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
No one can say for sure if he is guilty or innocent, and it should always be innocent until proven guilty. Did she allege that Antony was responsible as it happened or was it down the line when they were no longer together? It's possible she has her own dishonest motives, it is possible that Antony has harmed her, it's probably 50/50 chance. If he is guilty it will come to the light eventually and he will be punished, but what's the point of punishing him before being proven guilty.. just appeasing the woke crowd?Bad news. Don't want the scumbag back at the club!
You don't call out a doctor, your girlfriend has a ruptured implant and alleges her partner is responsible without there being some truth behind it.
Thank you for your verdict Judge @van Nistelrooy of the online public court of (social) media.Bad news. Don't want the scumbag back at the club!
You don't call out a doctor, your girlfriend has a ruptured implant and alleges her partner is responsible without there being some truth behind it.
And this is the crux of it. United have a duty of care towards their employee.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
That’s her business. The world is not black and white.Rachel Riley will not be happy.
No one can say for sure if he is guilty or innocent, and it should always be innocent until proven guilty. Did she allege that Antony was responsible as it happened or was it down the line when they were no longer together? It's possible she has her own dishonest motives, it is possible that Antony has harmed her, it's probably 50/50 chance. If he is guilty it will come to the light eventually and he will be punished, but what's the point of punishing him before being proven guilty.. just appeasing the woke crowd?
I hope you’re never in a position of decision-making and/or policing/legal power.Bad news. Don't want the scumbag back at the club!
You don't call out a doctor, your girlfriend has a ruptured implant and alleges her partner is responsible without there being some truth behind it.
Based on what? Whobare you to know more than those involved? Or are you just another one who loves to take the moral high ground?United really are the club with no morals.
Horrific decision but expected as much from them
Maybe I’m reading it wrong but it reads as United is satisfied he’s provided enough evidence to support his denials - not that United concluded he’s clear of any wrongdoing.United need to stop coming to these conclusions. No one asked them to and they’re not qualified.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Go support another team then. Funny how many fans have insider knowledge or have seen more evidence than the policeBad news. Don't want the scumbag back at the club!
You don't call out a doctor, your girlfriend has a ruptured implant and alleges her partner is responsible without there being some truth behind it.
You have to protect all parties. Mendy was found not guilty and look how his career developed…The issue is he’s not been charged with anything. City played Mendy, Arsenal are playing Partey, Brighton played Bissouma, Bayern played Ribery the list goes on. It’s a mix of football clubs not caring / as employers not being able to drop them if they are only being investigated and not yet charged
There are always huge ‘say the line, Bart’ vibes when reading through posts like that. Just waiting for the word to pop up.
Also, this. The club shows enough support by letting him back to the side.United need to stop coming to these conclusions. No one asked them to and they’re not qualified.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Where have I heard this beforeUnited need to stop coming to these conclusions. No one asked them to and they’re not qualified.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Why would we regret it? We have said we will monitor the outcome and change course if needed. We aren’t saying we support violence or framing a footballer.Hopefully we don’t regret this decision.
Will be very happy to have him back on the right given other options currently.
Use his right foot?What more could we ask him to have done?
United need to stop taking decisions for itself? Alright then.United need to stop coming to these conclusions. No one asked them to and they’re not qualified.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date