Antony | Here we go! €100mill, contract until June 2027, option 'til 2028.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Poor lad can't be our posterboy without Photoshop. Too much acne.
 
I‘m getting sick of the incessant moaning of certain pathetic individuals.

-Darwin Nunez goes to Pool for 100 mill and you moan: Why didn‘t we get him?
-Antony may cost 90+ million and you moan: It‘s too much, we are always overpaying.

-Frenkie de Jong wanted to stay at Barça and you moan: he doesn‘t want to come here we don‘t want him.
-Antony wants to come here and you moan:
we don‘t want him.

-Frenkie de Jong is a priority target and you moan: he is not a true dm.
-Casemiro, the best dm in the world comes here and you moan: he is not a playmaker.

Should I go on? You Miserable fecking cnuts!?

:lol:

Spot on, some on here have got so used to moaning about everything related to United that they don't know how to do anything else anymore.
 
Bid accepted today. Medical tomorrow. In the stands on Saturday....

Written off by October.
 
Price is high. But how do you assess whether it is too high?
The comparative method.
Cost and relative qualities of available alternatives…
Kulusevski will cost Spurs around £35m and we bought Richarlison for £60m this window. Richarlison is proven in the league and can play anywhere in front three. I think you are overpaying by around 25-30 million on this kid especially because wingers from Holland usually struggle in the Premiership. Look at Ziyech, Bergwijn, etc recently. Maybe he will do great but it's a pretty big risk.
 
Well yeh roughly that. Basically they are 2 year apart when their transfer happened. Diaz at age 24-25 the season he joined Liverpool for 37.5m (+12.5m add on), whereas Antony is going to join us at age 22-23 this season, for reported 80m.

But point remains, Antony shouldn’t go beyond 50m price range in comparison to Diaz and Raphinha.
Just take the loss, your ages and stats were miles out, you were either wrong or knowingly altered them to prove your point.

Roonster09 has called you out on them for all to see, Antony is much further ahead in his development than diaz was at the same age, hence the higher fee. Not that it matters, Liverpool got a gem at a good price, fair play, it happens, hopefull we'l be saying the same about Malacia in a few month.
 
I think Antony should've been bought when he was in Brazil when he looked a clear prospect and was worth the £15m.

Now I think he's worth £45m tops for what he's done at Ajax.

We're probably overpaying by £40m so Ten Hag better make this cnut work harder than he's ever worked before.

He's not that fast and he doesn't score that many goals. We could've signed Richarlison, Raphinha or Diaz for less money so pressures on this cat from the get go with a price tag higher than Cristiano Ronaldo when he left us as a Balon Dor winner after winning the Champions League.

Madness.

Back in 2009 £80 million got you the worlds best player. Circa 2020-22 it wouldn't even get you a 28 year old Lukaku or a prospect like Nunez from Portugal.
 
Kulusevski will cost Spurs around £35m and we bought Richarlison for £60m this window. Richarlison is proven in the league and can play anywhere in front three. I think you are overpaying by around 25-30 million on this kid especially because wingers from Holland usually struggle in the Premiership. Look at Ziyech, Bergwijn, etc recently. Maybe he will do great but it's a pretty big risk.
Be prepared to be hammered how these players aren't comparable in the slightest, but you're absolutely right. There's no metric or comparison (Gordon for £60m aside) that would justify 100m for a winger from Holland with mediocre stats
 
Kulusevski will cost Spurs around £35m and we bought Richarlison for £60m this window. Richarlison is proven in the league and can play anywhere in front three. I think you are overpaying by around 25-30 million on this kid especially because wingers from Holland usually struggle in the Premiership. Look at Ziyech, Bergwijn, etc recently. Maybe he will do great but it's a pretty big risk.
Richarlison is a good comparable sale. He is proven and decent, if a little inconsistent. You have to factor in their ages and make some sort of assessment of their raw attributes. I’m not sure how that would come out but it’s possible, on that basis, that Antony would come out higher, allowing for age as well. Maybe, maybe not.

We want three comparable sales if possible.

The bottom line is that Overpaying is only really a meaningful term if you can identify and go and get someone as good in that position for less money.
 
I‘m getting sick of the incessant moaning of certain pathetic individuals.

-Darwin Nunez goes to Pool for 100 mill and you moan: Why didn‘t we get him?
-Antony may cost 90+ million and you moan: It‘s too much, we are always overpaying.

-Frenkie de Jong wanted to stay at Barça and you moan: he doesn‘t want to come here we don‘t want him.
-Antony wants to come here and you moan:
we don‘t want him.

-Frenkie de Jong is a priority target and you moan: he is not a true dm.
-Casemiro, the best dm in the world comes here and you moan: he is not a playmaker.

Should I go on? You Miserable fecking cnuts!?
Sticky this post
 
Even if no caftard can answer this straight away, it doesn't mean such a player doesn't exist tbh.
Exactly. I never answer on posts like that; "if not him, who" or "name x players better than y player" etc...
We have scouting department. Dozen of scouts who cover whole world. They are payed to find players in every category. So nobody can't tell me that there is no much cheaper right wingers similiar or better than Antony.

To be clear here; i am sucker for skill so i want Antony and few months ago i said that i want him more than any other player this summer. But it is a shame that we always must overpay players because our scouts are shit (or because we want to "back our manager").
 
It would be very hard to find any fan who thinks the deal is not overpriced but that's what we have to do once we left it too late and dealing with club that has lost many players. If we are good with planning, we would have had alternate players ready but I don't think we are. Or maybe EtH is very rigid on his targets and want Antony only for his right wing.

So the question is, do we spend the money or carry the hole in right wing for entire season?

You carry the hole, like we should've done in summer 2019 (Maguire and AWB) and we did in summer 2020 (Sancho).

I get overpaying for Casemiro simply because we are so short on numbers. But that's not the case on the wing - we literally paid £70m last summer to fill that position, and we've got fairly high rated young players coming through there too.
 
You carry the hole, like we should've done in summer 2019 (Maguire and AWB) and we did in summer 2020 (Sancho).

I get overpaying for Casemiro simply because we are so short on numbers. But that's not the case on the wing - we literally paid £70m last summer to fill that position, and we've got fairly high rated young players coming through there too.
Never mind numbers, we're short on quality in attack. Antony fulfills a need for the team
 
Kulusevski will cost Spurs around £35m and we bought Richarlison for £60m this window. Richarlison is proven in the league and can play anywhere in front three. I think you are overpaying by around 25-30 million on this kid especially because wingers from Holland usually struggle in the Premiership. Look at Ziyech, Bergwijn, etc recently. Maybe he will do great but it's a pretty big risk.
We are overpaying as the selling club are taking advantage of our sitution. But we have to get these players in if we want to compete for trophies again
 
That country ranking should not include 2017/2018. The Netherlands are on spoot 6,Portugal on 7
Erm, not really much of a difference. If you want to go all the way back to Diaz time in Porto, Portugal was ranked as 6 last season while Netherlands is in 7. But it’s quite meaningless to argue here. They are always ranked at about 6th or 7th. I don’t know what you are trying to achieve here arguing that.
 
You carry the hole, like we should've done in summer 2019 (Maguire and AWB) and we did in summer 2020 (Sancho).

I get overpaying for Casemiro simply because we are so short on numbers. But that's not the case on the wing - we literally paid £70m last summer to fill that position, and we've got fairly high rated young players coming through there too.
Just to remind you, Greenwood is very unlikely to play for us again.
Amad and Pellistri are not highly-rated at all.
Or are you referring to someone else?
 
We are overpaying as the selling club are taking advantage of our sitution. But we have to get these players in if we want to compete for trophies again
I guess the point us if we actually looked beyond ajax we could find similarly talented players we might not get rinsed for
 
Bid accepted today. Medical tomorrow. In the stands on Saturday....

Written off by October.
He'd last longer than Sancho before being written off then, it only took one game for Sancho to be branded as useless.

It was only two weeks ago we were all in for Arnautovic, now we're signing Antony, who imo will light up OT, we should consider ourselves lucky.
 
He'd last longer than Sancho before being written off then, it only took one game for Sancho to be branded as useless.

It was only two weeks ago we were all in for Arnautovic, now we're signing Antony, who imo will light up OT, we should consider ourselves lucky.
Lisandro was called an underwhelming transfer after Brighton.
 
He'd last longer than Sancho before being written off then, it only took one game for Sancho to be branded as useless.

It was only two weeks ago we were all in for Arnautovic, now we're signing Antony, who imo will light up OT, we should consider ourselves lucky.

Very true. It's really sad.

I think Antony will do well, he's the type of player who you go to watch. Exciting and unpredictable.

I don't give a shit how much he costs to be honest.
 
Redcafe lately takes approximately 15 minutes before pronouncing players shit.
 
You carry the hole, like we should've done in summer 2019 (Maguire and AWB) and we did in summer 2020 (Sancho).

I get overpaying for Casemiro simply because we are so short on numbers. But that's not the case on the wing - we literally paid £70m last summer to fill that position, and we've got fairly high rated young players coming through there too.

We are short on numbers in attacking position too. Rashford, Sancho are our only wingers. After that we are relying on Elanga who is still very young and doesn't have a single season at high level. We don't have a single left footed winger at the club.

If we have alternatives then we should go for them. As of today, we are linked with 0 right wingers apart from Antony.
 
I get that you’re playing devil’s advocate here, and I get your main point being that the price is too high.

Still, I think you’re arguing too much like a bent advocate. You continually chose to present things skewed to make his age seem older, the price higher, the output less. Needless.

Comparing Antony and Luiz, I think we are paying extra because of several combined factors: Age compared to output is one (A at 22 v L at 22). Another is the supply/demand of left footed players v right footed. A third is United’s acute need of certain players v Liverpool’s. A fourth is thevalue of money over player for Ajax at this time v Porto’s at that time. A fifth is Ten Hag wanting specifically this player v Klopp wanting just a player of that profile and level.

All these factors don’t just add, they multiply. Bottom line is that United are where we are due to past mistakes etc, and now we must judge the value of this particular player to this particular project, compared to other particular players of his particular profile who is available right now. Looking at Martinez and Malacia v Liverpool, I tend to think it’s worth the risk at this moment.
Well not only that. Antony was actually priced at 80m euros by Ajax in about a month ago. As we leave it too late to panic buy now, they now raised the price to nearly 100m euros. Maybe a lot of you didn’t realise, there is definitely big stupidity/incompetence in our part which forced ourself into situation to further overpay the already inflated amount against market value as compared to other player transfer of similar calibre.

At the end of the day I don’t mind us getting a quality player like Antony of course, but we are not only risking big money here, we are also risking our reputation in future transfer dealing.
 
Last edited:
Very true. It's really sad.

I think Antony will do well, he's the type of player who you go to watch. Exciting and unpredictable.

I don't give a shit how much he costs to be honest.
100%

The fee is for accountants and rival fans/press to use for ammunition. At the end of the day we are signing one of the best RW prospects in football. Something we've needed for a LONG time.

A pacey, skillful, agile winger that loves to press also? what more could you want.

So what if we've paid £20m more than market price, in the future nobody will care.
 
I think we've decided to push this through in this window instead of next summer just to avoid the comedians in the tabloids all using the same shitty pun in their headlines when we sign Declan Rice.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.