IWat
Full Member
- Joined
- Aug 20, 2014
- Messages
- 938
If the objective is to insult Levy and torpedo a deal, sure.Use him as part of the Kane deal. Get the sick note off the wage bill.
If the objective is to insult Levy and torpedo a deal, sure.Use him as part of the Kane deal. Get the sick note off the wage bill.
As long as he is not EtH’s plan for next season, don’t care if he lingers around for the next season. Our transfer plans should not take him into account at all.
At his best he was a rare combination of great hold-up play, clever, quick passing and incredible dribbling skills, coupled with pretty clinical finishing (though lacking instinctive movement and positioning). On this season's evidence it's very much doubtful whether he can still be that player. He's still an intelligent player but seems a lot heavier on his feet than he used to, which is detrimental to his touch and dribbling.
We can have Rashford as back-up to our new striker. Have Jadon & Garnacho as back-up to Rashford whenever he has to play centrally.I highly doubt we’re buying two strikers this summer so he’s going to have to be in our plans for his final season.
This is no club taking him off us with the wages he’s on. And the fact he can’t stay fit . We are stuck with himHe won't play for us again.
Only 1 year on his deal and he’s been linked to Saudi Arabia.This is no club taking him off us with the wages he’s on. And the fact he can’t stay fit . We are stuck with him
1 year with an option of anotherOnly 1 year on his deal and he’s been linked to Saudi Arabia.
I just don’t understand why they would announce this on a Tuesday? The game is on Saturday. Now City can prep for Rashford alone.
make it make sense!
Unless he's not actually injured and we're just trying to bamboozle them when they see his name on the lineup sheet! Ha!I just don’t understand why they would announce this on a Tuesday? The game is on Saturday. Now City can prep for Rashford alone.
make it make sense!
And? We clearly aren’t taking that option up are we?1 year with an option of another
I just don’t understand why they would announce this on a Tuesday? The game is on Saturday. Now City can prep for Rashford alone.
make it make sense!
ThisI wouldn’t have started him anyway.
He won’t be doing that. He’s injured - pulled his hamstring against Fulham and is out of the final.
I just don’t understand why they would announce this on a Tuesday? The game is on Saturday. Now City can prep for Rashford alone.
make it make sense!