He would not start for more than half of the other PL clubs.
How many goals does not shitting the bed translate to?Wait, people are having a go at Martial?
The whole team did the square root of feck all in attack between WH’s goal and his substitution, and the few half chances we got at the end were the result of him actually trying to find a breakthrough, and he’s copping the shit?
Rashford has been shit for weeks now, Antony since the Sevilla game, ditto Sancho. The only one who has been ok is Bruno and even he has lost his shooting boots, but let’s pile on the easy target.
He was shit last match (mainly for not taking those two chances) but if you can’t see that he was one of the few who didn’t shit the bed today then there’s no point because your dislike of him afford no room for objectivity.
I’m the opposite I think, which is the fundamental reason I’ve said I think I’d prefer an alternative option to Kane. I think Rashford sticks out like a sore thumb in our attack, and every hope of penetration is basically just the Marcus Rashford show. Aside from him, everyone else seems to want to occupy the same area and not stretch the opposition, apart from Antony sometimes.
Being willing to run at defenders and passes forward instead of backward to begin with.How many goals does not shitting the bed translate to?
Because he's supposed to be a goalscorer and the closest he came to scoring today was glancing a header from five yards just out of reach for another United player and out for a throw-in.
I find it shocking when players who have at clubs for years don't improve at specific aspect of the game, Martial has always been bad at heading the ball. It also means like it's a medical condition, that he is doomed to be shit at it for ever whereas you can improve on it, Rashford is the best example. Besides he didn't need to be particularly good at heading for that chanceThat De Gea blunder has taken attention away from his pathetic miss from that free header at the near post.
Striker for Man United, you’re having a laugh.
I find it shocking when players who have at clubs for years don't improve at specific aspect of the game, Martial has always been bad at heading the ball. It also means like it's a medical condition, that he is doomed to be shit at it for ever whereas you can improve on it, Rashford is the best example. Besides he didn't need to be particularly good at heading for that chance
He played ok yesterday but 90% of the posts are still shitting on him. I doubt anyone thinks he’s the solution.Why do posters like you just make stuff up in your head to complain about?Did ok when he came on, which inevitably means the usual suspects will call for him to be given another chance
That De Gea blunder has taken attention away from his pathetic miss from that free header at the near post.
Striker for Man United, you’re having a laugh.
I find it shocking when players who have at clubs for years don't improve at specific aspect of the game, Martial has always been bad at heading the ball. It also means like it's a medical condition, that he is doomed to be shit at it for ever whereas you can improve on it, Rashford is the best example. Besides he didn't need to be particularly good at heading for that chance
I do remember it, such rare was the occurence. It was a good header tooRemember that headed goal he scored against Chelsea at Stamford Bridge? Was the most surprised I'd been at a goal for ages. It was one of the most unMartial things Martial has ever done.
I'd give him a 1 year extension. The reality is if we let both him and WW go (and WW needs to go), we're not going to be able to sign two strikers. Can Martial be a back up? I think so.
We don't have the budget to sign two strikers.You think a player that can't be trusted to be fit when called upon is good backup?
A part of me feels like he still has another gear left in him if he could only stay healthy. Another, more rational part, says he will probably never be healthy, nor does he have the cut and thrust of player he was at 19 or 20.
We don't have the budget to sign two strikers.
He's good enough to be a back up with a view of getting rid in summer 2024.
No thanks.I'd give him a 1 year extension. The reality is if we let both him and WW go (and WW needs to go), we're not going to be able to sign two strikers. Can Martial be a back up? I think so.
How is offering a player who has been fit for realistically 2 months possibly since the start of the season be a good idea? Martial can't be a back up because he's not available for selection, and when he is available a lot of the time he genuinely looks like he doesn't give a flying feck - giving players like this an extension is mind blowing.I'd give him a 1 year extension. The reality is if we let both him and WW go (and WW needs to go), we're not going to be able to sign two strikers. Can Martial be a back up? I think so.
It's not just his health. It is his attitude, which has been dreadful, absolutely dreadful for years now. Ian Wright summed it up by stating that if you are getting dropped for Wout Weghorst, then that pretty much speaks for itself.
Martial should go back to Ligue 1, with a mid-table team. Then again, that may be difficult for him, as the French have a good supply of very bright hungry players. Counts Martial out then.
Thuram isn’t a striker. He’s a left winger, something we’re stocked well with.We do, we can sign someone like Thuram or Dembele for free, stop the nonsense
Not to mention no one even knows what our budget will be this summer. Shifting Martial if we can (who is on 250k weekly) also give us funds to replace him
Similarly we signed Casemiro and Eriksen last summer (good business)
Thuram isn’t a striker. He’s a left winger, something we’re stocked well with.
Do you mean Moussa Dembele? How much is he available for?
I’m not saying giving Martial a 1 year extension is the best option, simply it’s one that can allow for short and long term transfer goals.
I'd give him a 1 year extension.
Ok admittedly I didn’t know he had a year left. Thought he was out of contract come the summer.Not in a million years.
He has 1 year left anyway, why the feck would we want to give him more money after how much we've already wasted on him.
If we cant find a club stupid enough to take him off our hands in the summer (which we wont) then he can finish his contract as a backup and feck off next summer.
Ok admittedly I didn’t know he had a year left. Thought he was out of contract come the summer.
What's even worse?Even worse
What's even worse?