Alemar
Full Member
- Joined
- Jul 11, 2017
- Messages
- 8,478
This is technically not true. He doesn’t belong to any club currently ...I have no sympathy nor care! He belongs to another club now.
This is technically not true. He doesn’t belong to any club currently ...I have no sympathy nor care! He belongs to another club now.
It works both ways. Why would he sign the contract if he had no indication of playing time or a path to the first team?Why would you send a player on loan until the end of his contract? Impress on loan to leave on a free?
If he wanted to go on loan then sign a contract. It happened that way with Henderson too.
Free agent so he'll get more money either through wages or signing on fee.
Just have a gander over at the Odegaard thread of previous years. Place is genuinely embarrassing.Should be a good move for him. The reaction on here from a few has been so weird, thinking he's ruined any chance of a career in professional football because he didn't renew with us. Not everyone wants to stay. Get over it.
As part of his new contract negotiations, he was to be loaned out this season to a Championship side or similar. His reps have really done him dirty here.Other way round. He sorted a loan for himself and we cancelled it and refused to let him go on loan.
I think the way in which he left isn’t that weird. There are a number of his peers that were in the same position, Danny Loader is still without a club, for example. The Covid situation and extension of the season gave players extra time to consider their options.
Older players like Cavani, Lyle Taylor, Jeff Hendrick and several others as well. There is no rush as clubs either aren’t playing or they’re focusing on finishing a season these free agents can play no part in.I think the way in which he left isn’t that weird. There are a number of his peers that were in the same position, Danny Loader is still without a club, for example. The Covid situation and extension of the season gave players extra time to consider their options.
After refusing his previous loans and sitting him in the stands for 18 months? And a loan to a random club which we typically have a terrible track record of sorting?As part of his new contract negotiations, he was to be loaned out this season to a Championship side or similar. His reps have really done him dirty here.
It works both ways. Why would he sign the contract if he had no indication of playing time or a path to the first team?
I'm not bothered enough to get into a long discussion about it, honestly. If Lille are choosing to send him on loan he probably wasn't ready to make it here anytime soon. I just don't think that necessarily equates to arrogance from Gomes' side.
Danny loaderI think the way in which he left isn’t that weird. There are a number of his peers that were in the same position, Danny Loader is still without a club, for example. The Covid situation and extension of the season gave players extra time to consider their options.
Great move for him. One year at Boavista, to get back on track after getting almost no senior game time here. Then one or two good seasons at Lille, and he will be at a great club in a great league again. As a starter this time
He will prove a lot of people wrong. Feel free to quote me in a couple of years
After refusing his previous loans and sitting him in the stands for 18 months? And a loan to a random club which we typically have a terrible track record of sorting?
Lille are a great club with a young side, and a loan to Boavista who is owned by the same people thus with the same goals of his development. Seems to me his reps did just fine.
It might technically be unnecessary, but it contains lots of nerve endings.
You made it sound like you are the only person that thinks he will do well by moving to another club, but in fact your opinion shares by majority on here.
If you have read the responses clearly people are only questioning why he turned us down as he could have got a loan move if he had stayed at United.
Except he was in the stands. He had 13 u23s appearances in those 18 months. 11 of which in a league he outgrew, 18 months ago. His contract isn’t a reason to block a loan in January 2019. It doesn’t take 18 months to decide he can’t handle it.Except he was not in the stands for 18 months, his performances were not good enough when given the chance. He was playing in the u23s while training with the first team. Also, the reason he was not loaned was not only because he had not signed a contract, but also to gauge if he could directly break in to the first team and handle that level. He could not, and would have likely been loaned next season.
The reps have totally fecked up, in the end they have not achieved anything different to what they would have got here.
Danny loader
United did nothing the last 2 years. The club messed him around. I wouldn't trust the club to nurture my career if they weren't able to make him progress since his last contract.
I am rubbing it in for the guys, who think he wasn't all that and by leaving United and not going to a top club, his career is doomed. He made a mistake apparently.
Because maybe the loan move he got from Lille, guaranteed him more game time than if he was loaned out to a club of United's choosing? We don't have that kind of partnership with another club.You made it sound like you are the only person that thinks he will do well by moving to another club, but in fact your opinion shares by majority on here.
If you have read the responses clearly people are only questioning why he turned us down as he could have got a loan move if he had stayed at United.
Except he was in the stands. He had 13 u23s appearances in those 18 months. 11 of which in a league he outgrew, 18 months ago. His contract isn’t a reason to block a loan in January 2019. It doesn’t take 18 months to decide he can’t handle it.
His reps haven’t fecked anything up. They’ve achieved him finding a club who he believes will give him more game time and develop him better.
Only 1,400 minutes at all levels in 18 months is the definition of in the stands. He wasn't playing matches, hence he was sitting in the stands.He was not in the stands, he was playing games and training with the first team, that is not being in the stands for 18 months.
He was dominating u23s matches throughout 18/19 and was most certainly ready to make a further step. He's missed at most a few weeks with injuries in that time, that doesn't explain the pitiful amount of football he's played.He was certainly not ready 18 months ago, and the low number of appearance for the u23s were also because he had some small niggling injuries during that time. He certainly had not grown out of that level 18 months ago.
Hence why he organized a loan.He was not ready for the first team this season, much less 18 months ago.
It does not take 18 months to evaluate him. Exactly, loaning him to a poor club won't help. Something we do on the regular.And yes, it does take time to decide whether to loan him or not, as loaning him to a poor club won't help him either. Not to mention every player is different, and way to improve is also different. Loans don't always work, and if his reps thought he was ready 18 months ago to play men's football, then that just shows the poor job they are doing.
So we don't loan players out in case they do too good and ask for better compensation. But rather sit them in the stands so we can force them into lower wages? Wow.His contract is a reason not to let him go on loan, as that just gives the player the chance to ask stupid terms of he has even a moderate success with it. Considering the demands that he was making, it was the right option.
Except they haven't.His reps have absolutely fecked it up,
They never said that, so you've made that up.they were deluding themselves that Gomes could play in a top team from a top league at this point.
We have little track record to support being able to do that. And no loan we sort will suit his development as well as any loan to a related club.We had offered a very good contract, and would have loaned him to a club that suited his development best.
Here you go again just making stuff up.His reps have not achieved anything other than getting him to some club that does not care about his development.
Owners which run a club around developing young players and have purchased Boavista with the sole purpose of further player development. Owners which have a DoF which this forum has wanked itself silly over for years now. A club with a CEO with roots in Barcelona. It'll suit him just grand.He has been loaned as soon as he signed, to a club which may or may not suit him, just because they have the same owners.
Guess it is good he left a "top team" to get playing time then.Good luck to him, but he needs to improve a lot before he can play in a top team.
He’s shite thoughHe came up in the same age group for England as Gomes and won the U17s World Cup with him. Theres a good chance he’ll be playing in Portugal next year too.
He’s shite though
He’s not shite. He was very highly rated as a youth player. Like Gomes he hasn’t delivered on that promise yet.
Ultimately like most young players.
I don't even understand that now as its being reported that he is being loaned out to a Portuguese club. Could he not have found a more competitive loan from United to a lower premier league club like Newcastle or an EFL club like Bournemouth or Watford?
I think he has been guaranteed a starting place by the Lille owners and that's the main reason. Boavista had 44.7% average possession this season and are not the most creative and fluid team at all. But regardless, I hope he makes the most of it and progresses a lot. He is a talent I want to see shine at some point in the future.I'll just share my thoughts on this, but for a young, creative player, would a loan to a lower PL club really be of that much benefit? Sure, some clubs do endeavor to play good football, but in general I wouldn't look at a lower PL team or a Championship team as the best place for a creative player to develop.