Member 122739
Guest
I'm a big fan of Mitten, he speaks with about as much balance as is possible when reporting about the club he supports. He does an excellent spot on OTBAM every so often and manages to shut Ger "Cliche of the day" Gilroy up.
Or maybe, just maybe, ETH was convincing that he knows what the problems are and how to clear them up, which probably involves the change of control of the club, discussions with SJR about infrastructure and a couple of transfer windows to ship out disruptive players.
Can't tell if you are taking the piss here, but all of our sackings were far too late when the damage has been done.I can't be bothered with yet another knee-jerk sacking followed by an interim and then another new manager who gets one season's grace before the players decide it's too much like hard work and get the manager sacked again. Give ETH a proper crack under Brailsford/SJR and see how he gets on.
Yes, "knee-jerk" was the wrong phrase to use. "Cop-out" would've been better. "Distraction" may have been even more appropriate.Can't tell if you are taking the piss here, but all of our sackings were far too late when the damage has been done.
It's not about rating AM or not. If a manager talks to unrelated party about club affair off the record, even this discussion is not published, it's still bad form. What stopped other workers at the club/organization doing the same. Just because those workers pick a less trustworthy journalist that eventually leak the "between you and me" off record, doesn't make it worse. What makes it bad is letting these outsiders know the inside of dressing room in the first place!Things are discussed "off the record" all of the time, so yes it's likely that ETH told Mitten things that Mitten can't pass on.
I like AM and trust what he says; he clearly has a hell of a lot more access and knowledge than I do, so why would I assume to know better? You on the other hand clearly don't rate AM, which is fine, maybe you're right and I'm wrong. Time will tell.
He knows how to weaponize them like Ralph did, yeah.What EtH does know is how to speak to the hearts of the fanbase.
Actually it's quite salty, because it's obvious he's running defence for Ten Hag.Super reply!
He is allowed to form his own view and revert appropriately to some numpty on the internet who claims that he has taken a bribe.Actually it's quite salty, because it's obvious he's running defence for Ten Hag.
Mitten is a journo, he wouldn't be one if he was so squeaky clean. He's also defending the indefendable right now, so questions should be asked.He is allowed to form his own view and revert appropriately to some numpty on the internet who claims that he has taken a bribe.
Or he doesn't actually want to believe, but wants to keep that direct connection within the club, so that he can sell his credibility for all kind of exclusive info/story and make money.I like Mitten, he talks a lot from what the heart wants rather than what his head is saying because he’s a United fan first and foremost. He was banging on about United having a great season this season based on nothing but vibes during the preseason, and he followed them on tour to the States.
Point being, he wants to believe whatever he’s told because he’s spoken to someone who apparently has a plan and can directly affect things.
It really isn't. If you have followed his tone he's been hugely critical of him in podcasts.Actually it's quite salty, because it's obvious he's running defence for Ten Hag.
You don't have to put a tweet out at all, he's doing it because he knows things we don't. And weirdly it's irking some people here.You get an inside scoop interview with the manager of Manchester United football club, the first thing you're absolutely not going to do is shit on him and say he's finished
I think he might do that for Barcelona but if you listen to any of the Athletic podcasts you’ll hear that he’s incredibly invested in United on sentimental level.Or he doesn't actually want to believe, but wants to keep that direct connection within the club, so that he can sell his credibility for all kind of exclusive info/story and make money.
Has he? I thought he was pretty balanced this time? Puts equal blame on the players and the manager. I’ve always thought it’s a good indication of something not being right if Mitten is being overly harsh on someone.It really isn't. If you have followed his tone he's been hugely critical of him in podcasts.
No, he's been a lot more stern toward ten hag than he has toward other managers.Has he? I thought he was pretty balanced this time? Puts equal blame on the players and the manager. I’ve always thought it’s a good indication of something not being right if Mitten is being overly harsh on someone.
Not seeing him be hugely critical here.It really isn't. If you have followed his tone he's been hugely critical of him in podcasts.
So a fluff piece.You get an inside scoop interview with the manager of Manchester United football club, the first thing you're absolutely not going to do is shit on him and say he's finished
So you haven't really listened to any of his podcasts up to this point.Not seeing him be hugely critical here.
I only have your word on it. But now he definitely can't be objective.So you haven't really listened to any of his podcasts up to this point.
Because he's said something you disagree with?I only have your word on it. But now he definitely can't be objective.
A Man Utd related journalist not putting a tweet out that he's had an interview with the manager? Would be missing a lot of interactions!You don't have to put a tweet out at all, he's doing it because he knows things we don't. And weirdly it's irking some people here.
He could have just printed the transcript of his interview or said he interviewed him. He didn't do that though, he gave his own opinion and he didn't owe anyone to do that.A Man Utd related journalist not putting a tweet out that he's had an interview with the manager? Would be missing a lot of interactions!
It's the United Stand interview he's referencing surely?He could have just printed the transcript of his interview or said he interviewed him. He didn't do that though, he gave his own opinion and he didn't owe anyone to do that.
You mean United we stand? If so why does that matter? He didn't need to give his own opinion unless he had a genuine feeling of change.It's the United Stand interview he's referencing surely?
Hagatha ChristieSancho's text to Rashford after realising the Media ban was a setup to find the moles.
Actually it's quite salty, because it's obvious he's running defence for Ten Hag.
Mitten is backing him. I’m sure now he’s saying something in support of the manager he’ll be slagged off though and his opinion called worthless.
https://x.com/andymitten/status/1731783905236107668?s=46&t=3cSPEXx54yOkvLX_Hq8XPw
Publishing stories without going to the club to comment/give context/challenge. Standard protocol is to do this so they can call it bullshit if it is bullshit (let's be real, the guys banned here are complete garbage reporters with no actual sources and constantly make shit up for clicks)That will fix things. What did they do exactly?
Who said he wasn't? Don't put words in my mouth.Ridiculous, he’s allowed to have an opinion.
Who said he wasn't? Don't put words in my mouth.
You actually implied quite strongly he wasn't. His own opinion has been pawned off as being some mouthpiece for the club, and not his own views.Who said he wasn't? Don't put words in my mouth.