I disagree, we could have gotten way better fees for a lot of players by selling them a year earlier instead of letting them rot on the bench for a half or full season.
I mean, Lingard is a great example. He's going for free and contributing next to nothing because our visionless manager wanted to keep instead of cashing 20-25 million.
Herrera was let go on a free as well. Could Martial have gotten an actual fee in the summer? Who knows. If Donny has no future he should've been going on loan in the summer to raise his value asap, etc, etc. Pogba leaving for free is is bizarre as well.
The big reason why we're the highest net spend in the last decade is because we don't sell properly, exceptions like Dan James aside.
I agree that letting go instead of handing out a new contract is better some times, but why put yourself in that position in the first place?
Let's not pretend like the Glazers hand the club unlimited transfer funds. If we'd sold better we'd have more money to spend.
Club | Incomings | Sales | Net |
---|
Manchester United | 1.545 | 470 | -1.075 |
Manchester City | 1.699 | 715 | -984 |
Paris Saint-Germain | 1.445 | 504 | -941 |
Barcelona | 1.630 | 980 | -650 |
Arsenal | 1.029 | 446 | -583 |
Juventus | 1.542 | 981 | -561 |
AC Milan | 884 | 452 | -432 |
Everton | 911 | 482 | -429 |
Aston Villa | 701 | 277 | -424 |
Chelsea | 1.614 | 1.201 | -413 |