Oneunited26
New Member
- Joined
- Mar 19, 2014
- Messages
- 4,635
The game against Bruges was totally unrepresentative of the way our season will go. We won't face many weaker sides this season, for one thing.
Herrera looked good because Bruges were all over the place and he had space to run into. Januzaj is van Gaal's first pick because he's much more likely to beat a man. The two players take to the role very differently. Against PL opposition, I can see why LvG opts for Adnan, since the space that Herrera thrives in is far more difficult to find.
Herrera's problem is that he's not really a #10 so it'll be difficult for him to be the creative fulcrum in tight games. I think he'd look better as one of two #8s in a 4-3-3, but we don't really have any other #8s to pair him with.
This could be a frustrating season for him, I reckon. His best hope is that we buy another box-to-box midfielder to replace Carrick at some point.
Yea but Janazaj could not find the space even against Brugges last night, he was awful even against them. Which does ask the problem, why keep with a player who does not know the no10 role? at bilbao that was herrera's best position. So while they were awful, so was janazaj in the position he's been asked to play. When herrera was changed, he already improved us. let us not forget how he played city off the park last season, when we look at their record against us since 2011