izec
Full Member
i think that he is our most important signing too. We really need him and Blind to control the midfield and play some passes to our offensive players. It is time to step up in midfield and boss games again.
Oh God... Don't remind us of that substitution
The biggest problem is they just target him as we saw against Swansea. Thats why we need another top quality CM alongside him, otherwise you just have to take him out and we are struggling. After his show against Galaxy, it wasnt just thst his level dropped, but you could see the opposition teams closing him down immeditely and fouling him constantly. He is our best midfielder and they know it.
The biggest problem is they just target him as we saw against Swansea. Thats why we need another top quality CM alongside him, otherwise you just have to take him out and we are struggling. After his show against Galaxy, it wasnt just thst his level dropped, but you could see the opposition teams closing him down immeditely and fouling him constantly. He is our best midfielder and they know it.
Not to under-appreciate our current new buys but if we get Strootman I think he'll be ideal next to Ander in the same way he works with Pjanic.
TBF I hold the converse opinion. Herrera is more akin to Strootman in a high octane box-to-box #8 position. His tenacity and superb work ethic combined with good mobility is ideally suited to that role. What he can't do with relative consistency is be the main rhythm-setter of a midfield and control the tempo from deeper areas. Which is more Pjanic territory. Strootman combined with Herrera would give us two very similar midfielders and I'm not sure that's the best idea.
Having Blind and Di Maria in midfield next to him, as opposed to Fletcher or Cleverley, should help him.
I was thinking along the lines of Strootman and Herrera playing as box to box CM's in front of Blind, who I guess would play the tempo setting role, with Di Maria possibly moving up as part of a front 3. Strootman's physicality in midfield next to Herrera might offer him some protection.
Pjanic was a beast for Bosnia at the World Cup but there wasn't even a word that he's linked to us. I suspect maybe our scouts think that he wouldn't suit us.TBF I hold the converse opinion. Herrera is more akin to Strootman in a high octane box-to-box #8 position. His tenacity and superb work ethic combined with good mobility is ideally suited to that role. What he can't do with relative consistency is be the main rhythm-setter of a midfield and control the tempo from deeper areas. Which is more Pjanic territory. Strootman combined with Herrera would give us two very similar midfielders and I'm not sure that's the best idea.
You're putting far too much emphasis on the limitations those roles would present. Blind, Strootman and Herrera are all ball winners who have tactical nous, there's not many midfield 3 in world football that it would be more difficult to control a game against. I think you're also underplaying their passing ability, let's not forget Herrera was playing as a #10 last season, you don't play there unless you have a bit of creativity about you.That's an idea but IMO our team will become totally unbalanced. Ideally in a 3 man midfield :
1. is the defensive screen whose main job is to guard the central defenders.
2. is the primary playmaker than can control the tempo of a game while in possession of the ball.
3. is a box-to box midfielder or has good dribbling ability/ mobility to extent plays.
If we look at some of the better traditional 4-3-3/ 4-3-1-2 teams of the past decade :
Gattuso 1, Pirlo 2, Seedorf 3
Busquets 1, Xavi 2, Iniesta 3.
Alonso 1/2 hybrid, Modric 2/3 hybrid, Di Maria 3.
Edmilson 1, Xavi 2, Deco 3.
If we replace the 2 with two #3s there's every chance to lose control of the game, especially vs possession oriented teams because even though Herrera and Strootman are technically gifted - neither those 2 or Blind have the vision or passing range to really impose themselves on the game. The sole example of a successful team using 2 box-to-box player in the central areas Juventus but they have Pirlo as the playmaker.
What we need more than anything else IMO is someone who is like a younger Xabi or Scholes in his older days when he just sat back and picked teams apart. A player like him surrounded by the energy, workrate and mobility of Herrera + Di Maria would be a deadly combination and instantly catapult the current lot into one of the best midfields in Europe. I think someone like Koke or Ruben Neves (very inexperienced) would be better suited to that role than Strootman because both have great vision and the requisite passing range/ defensive work-rate.
You're putting far too much emphasis on the limitations those roles would present. Blind, Strootman and Herrera are all ball winners who have tactical nous, there's not many midfield 3 in world football that it would be more difficult to control a game against. I think you're also underplaying their passing ability, let's not forget Herrera was playing as a #10 last season, you don't play there unless you have a bit of creativity about you.
Yep. It annoys me when people say we don't address our shortcomings in defense and midfield. Well, we got 2 defenders and 3 midfielders, and all 5 either looks promising, or absolute world class. I swear if our midfield buy is not named Vidal, or defender named Benatia, people are gonna fecking complainsThis. Short, simple post, but a great post.
A midfield 3 of Herrera, Di Maria and Blind supporting a front 3 of Rooney, Falcao and RvP is gonna win trophies.
I can see where you're coming from but again I feel you're undervaluing their passing abilities, as you've already mentioned Juve are an example where you have similar players in a 3 and it still works. You could take it further and look at City, they have a midfield 2 if Toure and Fernandinho, at times they've even put Fernando in there to make a 3, there's no deep lying play maker but they can still control a game by imposing themselves with a bit of tenacity. You may feel it leads to 40+ passes for the opposition but conversely an extra ball winner (with ability) will counter that. Add Di Maria and Rooney to the mix and we have an incredibly hard working team that's going to turn the ball over a lot.1. Ideally United should be playing a more proactive brand of football. The first emboldened part disturbs me greatly. This reeks of reactionary playing style, where in a midfield of 3 stifling/ high work rate players in used to negate opposition creativity. The kind employed by Jose in Mendes, Costinha, Maniche. While it can be effective, this is certainly not how I envision United to be playing in the future. We should be trying to dictate the pace of the game and let the opposition worry about containing us rather than the other way round. Not that there's much wrong with being extra-forceful but this parking the bus scheme doesn't appeal very much to me.
2. Creativity is not a concern though. Loads of players have superlative amounts of skill and creative ability but only a few can influence the passage of play. At Bilbao Ander was an Oscar kind of high energy #10, who was equally renowned for his defensive work-rate and played quick passes in the final third. What I mean is someone who can slow down the game when necessary, ping the ball from sideline to sideline and keep proceeding in order. And he certainly isn't that kind of a player - someone who's a director in the mould of Scholes, Xavi, Pirlo, Alonso, Schweinsteiger or some of the more esteemed withdrawn play makers of the modern era.
A great example of illustrate the point I'm trying to make is Spain's victorious 2011 Euro U21 squad where Martinez was their #6, Herrera the box to box and Thiago was the primary play maker. Take Thiago out of that line-up and their control of the game will suffer massively because you're replacing someone who can consistently make 100+ passes per game with someone who averages around 60. Consequently that means 40+ extra passes for the opposition which lends them a greater amount of control over the game.
I can see where you're coming from but again I feel you're undervaluing their passing abilities, as you've already mentioned Juve are an example where you have similar players in a 3 and it still works. You could take it further and look at City, they have a midfield 2 if Toure and Fernandinho, at times they've even put Fernando in there to make a 3, there's no deep lying play maker but they can still control a game by imposing themselves with a bit of tenacity. You may feel it leads to 40+ passes for the opposition but conversely an extra ball winner (with ability) will counter that. Add Di Maria and Rooney to the mix and we have an incredibly hard working team that's going to turn the ball over a lot.
But is Yaya someone who can control games like you were originally stating? In fact its the biggest criticism.But see here's the thing though :
Juventus have arguably the 2nd greatest regista in modern football in Pirlo who can control matches almost single-handedly. Any permutation of Strootman, Ander, Blind can't replicate that. Omit Pirlo from their lineup and Juventus suffers evinced by them scraping past Chievo last week.
Roma in comparison have the perfect trio : De Rossi is the defensive holder, Naingollan/ Strootman is the box to box and Pjanic is the creative lynch pin - stemming from his average of 5 key passes per game this season. Even Chelsea's best starting midfield 3 adheres to this philosophy. Matic is the defensive holder, Ramires is the box to box and Cesc is the main creative force. Now before one argues it, yes Cesc is superior to Ander in play making/ passing ability. I believe we went for Herrera because he offers greater amounts of energy, team-work, drive and commitment. All admirable qualities but they won't overcompensate for his inherent deficiencies as a manipulator of the game.
City is again not the greatest comparison because Yaya Toure's passing ability and vision are world-class - something Ander or Strootman haven't displayed so far. People often under-rate that facet of his game, this is someone who's really expansive in his passing, having played in Guardiola's Barcelona. Matter of fact he regularly notches 100 passes per game while boasting 90 %+ pass completion. eg vs Liverpool he had 98 passes and 93 % pass accuracy.
Again, like you alluded to - I'm not arguing that it won't work in the right circumstances. But it's certainly not the best use of each players' ability, isn't as effective as a prototypical 3 man midfield is supposed to be and isn't aesthetically pleasing either. Why settle for Strootman when we have a player of similar ilk and could instead go for Koke who would cost maybe £10-15 million more than Strootman and is unarguably the better prospect.
Agree that Koke would be a better signing than Strootman and with the general thrust of your post but I would like to see how Herrera and Blind settle in the side first. If Blind could perform the Carrick role to a decent standard then it could work because Carrick was our conductor and isn't that the role Bind's agent said he was promised ? Yeah his no Pirlo but they are different ways to skin a cat.But see here's the thing though :
Juventus have arguably the 2nd greatest regista in modern football in Pirlo who can control matches almost single-handedly. Any permutation of Strootman, Ander, Blind can't replicate that. Omit Pirlo from their lineup and Juventus suffers evinced by them scraping past Chievo last week.
Roma in comparison have the perfect trio : De Rossi is the defensive holder, Naingollan/ Strootman is the box to box and Pjanic is the creative lynch pin - stemming from his average of 5 key passes per game this season. Even Chelsea's best starting midfield 3 adheres to this philosophy. Matic is the defensive holder, Ramires is the box to box and Cesc is the main creative force. Now before one argues it, yes Cesc is superior to Ander in play making/ passing ability. I believe we went for Herrera because he offers greater amounts of energy, team-work, drive and commitment. All admirable qualities but they won't overcompensate for his inherent deficiencies as a manipulator of the game.
City is again not the greatest comparison because Yaya Toure's passing ability and vision are world-class - something Ander or Strootman haven't displayed so far. People often under-rate that facet of his game, this is someone who's really expansive in his passing, having played in Guardiola's Barcelona. Matter of fact he regularly notches 100 passes per game while boasting 90 %+ pass completion. eg vs Liverpool he had 98 passes and 93 % pass accuracy.
Again, like you alluded to - I'm not arguing that it won't work in the right circumstances. But it's certainly not the best use of each players' ability, isn't as effective as a prototypical 3 man midfield is supposed to be and isn't aesthetically pleasing either. Why settle for Strootman when we have a player of similar ilk and could instead go for Koke who would cost maybe £10-15 million more than Strootman and is unarguably the better prospect.
But is Yaya someone who can control games like you were originally stating? In fact its the biggest criticism.
Still, valid points, I feel we just view the game a little differently.
Agree that Koke would be a better signing than Strootman and with the general thrust of your post but I would like to see how Herrera and Blind settle in the side first. If Blind could perform the Carrick role to a decent standard then it could work because Carrick was our conductor and isn't that the role Bind's agent said he was promised ? Yeah his no Pirlo but they are different ways to skin a cat.
Here's hoping he can come back and have a solid base to work from.
He hasn't been particularly impressive but it's been hard with effectively no midfield partner alongside him.
IMO he was one of our best, if not our best player vs Swansea on the first day. We went to shit shortly after he was subbed off.
Not really saying much is it? We were fairly shocking all round against Swansea.
He was solid but didn't stand out for me. Didn't really offer too much but had a good touch, gave the ball away a few times but mostly kept possession well.