I see, so you're on a wum.
I see, so you're on a wum.
Not at all.I see, so you're on a wum.
That's all good but that goal wasnt a tap in.Not at all.
I replied to someone earlier but to ask someone do they know what a tap in is is a bit silly mate but let me put it this way;
There are chances in football that should be converted and there are half chances which the good players convert.
The chances that should be converted are one on one with the GK unless they make a really good save but the odds are heavily stacked in the player’s favour.
I would be really worried if we have paid 85mil quid for an attacker that did not convert from a one on one situation.
Do you play golf?That's all good but that goal wasnt a tap in.
Nah.Do you play golf?
No worries, have a nice day.Nah.
Cheers.No worries, have a nice day.
It was pretty damn close to a tap-in though.Antony's goal was absolutely not a tap-in
It wasn't the most difficult chance in the world but still required a decent finish from that angle.
It was pretty damn close to a tap-in though.
Antony's goal was absolutely not a tap-in
It wasn't the most difficult chance in the world but still required a decent finish from that angle.
I mean, if by close you mean the similarities are that both would require the kicking of a ball, then yeh you are right.
A tap in is a goal with no one to beat not even the goalie from a close range, a goal were you still have the goalie to beat is called a one v one, if Antony strike was blocked by the keepers foot it would have been a great save those kind gets missed multiple times every match week.
Let's not reduce it, it was an opener in a big game on his debut.
To also add, the angle made it tougherI can only assume some here have never played football but here it goes.
A tap-in is a close range strike which requires minimum effort AND is unopposed.
Ramsdale was stood between the sticks. The shot was not unopposed. I’d also say it required more than minimum effort to finish and whilst the range was close it was too far away to meet the threshold.
Hope this clears matters up.
Rooney's tap in against Newcastle in 2005 has to be up there too.
what are his technical qualities?Not sure why but I have always felt positively about the kid. Just seems to have something. Certainly capable of making it here but needs the chips to fall for him at Sunderland.
technically - no issues whatsoever
Decision making - seems his best attribute
Work ethic - does not seem to ever have been flagged as a problem
the problem seems to be his quite casual application - a bit too arrogant for such an early stage in his career. Sort of strolls and dwindles on the ball…lazy passes that he should really be pinging. Makes him seem like a luxury player when he probably isn’t.
A bit more urgency in his play - on and off the ball. I think he will come good.
what are his technical qualities?
Beckhams tap in v Wimbledon away was one of the better ones.
Good at tap-ins
Maradona 2nd goal v England, that was literally a tap inBeckhams tap in v Wimbledon away was one of the better ones.
Yea didn't buy that one to be honest, was he aiming for row zScholesy said he miss hit his tap in vs Barca, imagine miss hitting it from there
Scholesy said he miss hit his tap in vs Barca, imagine miss hitting it from there
I can understand what he would have meant to be honest. He probably intended to hit it cleaner than he did. He ended up cutting across it more than he would have liked but that ironically gave it the swerve it needed to end up where it did. Even at the time it did feel like a sliced shot.Yea didn't buy that one to be honest, was he aiming for row z
No let’s keep it going.It’s the second day, but we are still here “tap in”? Let’s forgive him, alright?
At the risk of derailing Amad's thread, I couldn't resist posting a video of my two of my favourite tap-ins:
You reckon?Neither of these are tap ins.
You reckon?
Maradona 2nd goal v England, that was literally a tap in
At the risk of derailing Amad's thread, I couldn't resist posting a video of my two of my favourite tap-ins: