izak
New Member
- Joined
- Mar 17, 2016
- Messages
- 1,804
- Supports
- Glory Glory Red Devils
That weight of pass for Facundo is
He's nowhere near ready to start for any PL club. Lower Championship or League 1 maybe.Needs a season on load in a PL club where he will play every week. Forrest, Brentford, Fulham, Bournemouth or somebody like that.
See how he does and either bring him back next year for the first team or sell.
Don't want to be too harsh on the lad but how the hell did we end up paying almost 40m for him? No wonder half of our scouting team has fecked off its borderline corruption.
Cheers Tom more at 10!
Good thing for Sancho is he has a portfolio at a very high level. Amad's career is made up of highlights in the U23s and Scottish League.Sounds like you are talking about Sancho as well.
Cheers Tom more at 10!
He was bought for £19m.
The Sancho comparison doesn't work as Sancho had more goals and assists in a big 5 league than any other u20 player did over the past 30+ years apart from Mbappe who had just 1 more. Amad doesn't even have 1000 minutes of professional football under his belt by the time he reached the age of 20.Sounds like you are talking about Sancho as well.
But with the add ons to make sure if he ever does make it, we don't get the benefits of developing a young player and will have then paid 40m for him. All risk and no reward unless he hits a world class level basically. Was just a bad deal all around.He was bought for £19m.
But he was signed seemingly because we believed he has the potential to reach a world class level. Therefore we would be paying €40m for a player who would be worth double that.But with the add ons to make sure if he ever does make it, we don't get the benefits of developing a young player and will have then paid 40m for him. All risk and no reward unless he hits a world class level basically. Was just a bad deal all around.
Yeah that's just paying 40m to hope you hit the lottery though. World class talents rarely become world class players. Hell, how often do you have a player who looks ridiculous at youth level and just fail to make the step up? Its just a signing that never made any sense. Different team in charge of all that now, but it really was the epitome of the previous regime to spend that on a player who never really stepped out of youth level, and didn't have the physical attributes to actually help him make the step up, and was multiple years away from potentially getting there.But he was signed seemingly because we believed he has the potential to reach a world class level. Therefore we would be paying €40m for a player who would be worth double that.
On the flipside, you would hope that even if Amad doesn't hit the heights required, we could still recoup our €19m or close to it. Nothing lost, nothing gained. I do agree that it clearly wasn't a well thought out move, as it didn't appear we had any sort of plan for him. We were tactically clueless anyway, so it wasn't an environment conducive for a young player to thrive in. I do believe that it was good work from us to identify him in the first place though.Yeah that's just paying 40m to hope you hit the lottery though. World class talents rarely become world class players. Hell, how often do you have a player who looks ridiculous at youth level and just fail to make the step up? Its just a signing that never made any sense. Different team in charge of all that now, but it really was the epitome of the previous regime to spend that on a player who never really stepped out of youth level, and didn't have the physical attributes to actually help him make the step up, and was multiple years away from potentially getting there.
But with the add ons to make sure if he ever does make it, we don't get the benefits of developing a young player and will have then paid 40m for him. All risk and no reward unless he hits a world class level basically. Was just a bad deal all around.
We already have "not good enough" players that are far better than Amad, there's no need to add more. Constantly hoping for a player to get better when he clearly does not have the physical or technical tools to succeed is how we end up with "deadwood" like Mctominay, Andreas, Baily, Rojo, and so on.
Sancho is 1.80m. Sancho also has incredible technical ability, and he was showing a lot more at the ages of 18-21 than Amad has ever shown in his career. Amad couldn't even hack it in Scotland ffs.
Needs a season on load in a PL club where he will play every week. Forrest, Brentford, Fulham, Bournemouth or somebody like that.
See how he does and either bring him back next year for the first team or sell.
Needs a season on load in a PL club where he will play every week. Forrest, Brentford, Fulham, Bournemouth or somebody like that.
See how he does and either bring him back next year for the first team or sell.
To be fair Konate would bundle most players off the ball!
You obviously have a excellent knowledge of the future, I wish I could see as far as you do.
He's 20 and his current attributes are awful. It's not the "future", it's the present. He's looked awful for the past 2 years, in the PL and in weaker leagues. He looked hilariously weak in a friendly. You're too sentimental over these youngsters, they're not your kids. The club comes first. You should strive to want the best possible players at all times. If someone looks underwhelming to you for a couple of seasons, get rid of them and replace them with someone you think will be a better player. Holding on to players for too long because they're "young, so they have potential" when they're nothing but mediocre is how you end up with 30 year old Lingards, Pogbas, Martials and Phil Jones with nothing to show for in their United careers.
Being ruthless is how you avoid having deadwood. Otherwise what's the point of getting rid of deadwood if you're just going to replace them with another one? Nothing's going to change until we change our overall behaviour to players, squad building, and transfers.
The sort of mentality that led to Chelsea binning Salah and De Bruyne.He's 20 and his current attributes are awful. It's not the "future", it's the present. He's looked awful for the past 2 years, in the PL and in weaker leagues. He looked hilariously weak in a friendly. You're too sentimental over these youngsters, they're not your kids. The club comes first. You should strive to want the best possible players at all times. If someone looks underwhelming to you for a couple of seasons, get rid of them and replace them with someone you think will be a better player. Holding on to players for too long because they're "young, so they have potential" when they're nothing but mediocre is how you end up with 30 year old Lingards, Pogbas, Martials and Phil Jones with nothing to show for in their United careers.
Being ruthless is how you avoid having deadwood. Otherwise what's the point of getting rid of deadwood if you're just going to replace them with another one? Nothing's going to change until we change our overall behaviour to players, squad building, and transfers.
He was pretty awful apart from the assist. He got outmuscled a lot and couldn't keep hold of the ball regularly enough. He is a technical player but I feel like he just lacks any athleticism to make it in the EPL.
The sort of mentality that led to Chelsea binning Salah and De Bruyne.
So do you think he'll reach their levels?The sort of mentality that led to Chelsea binning Salah and De Bruyne.
He wouldn't start for any team in the premier league, moved off the ball too easily. Maybe a bottom five team in the French, Dutch or Portuguese league would suit him on loan.
He's only 20 and doesn't look like he's fully filled out yet but needs to hit the gym harder.
I’d be very surprised if he did, but that’s not the point.So do you think he'll reach their levels?
Doesn't matter if he cannot cut it in EnglandGood thing for Sancho is he has a portfolio at a very high level. Amad's career is made up of highlights in the U23s and Scottish League.
Bernardo Silva is an immense athlete. Still remember his performance vs Liverpool in the 2-1 at the Etihad in 18/19, covered every blade of grass like a madman. You don’t need to be shredded like Ronaldo to be a top athlete.I don't think Bernardo Silva (to name one) is more athletic than Amad in any way, and there's plenty of similar players who survived with dignity in the PL like our little Juan. It's about learning the game and finding ways to exploit your qualities.
If ten Hag builds a good passing structure at United I think it's possible for Amad to play his part some day, maybe. His technical level is there to see and he's very agile both physical and mentally. Still too raw overall but it's way too early to close the door.
It could be interesting to send him out on loan to a dutch or german club with a similar brand of football to the one we want to develop now, so he can absorb well the principles of play. At the moment I think he lacks any tactical background after going from one place to another (Italian youth league, our academy, some EL games under Ole, Scotland, now the former Ajax manager) so I could expect him to be a bit lost on the field.
The dutch and the german league are interesting for young players from a formative point of view. The way they play is dynamic, but there's some element of softness that could be interesting as a mid step before throwing a young prospect to the lions in England. I think we should try to find a good place for the man around there where he could start more often and next summer we evaluate again. Maybe he surprises us in the coming games but even then I think a well studied loan could be good for him.
Amad is quicker than Sancho and is 3 yrs younger.The Sancho comparison doesn't work as Sancho had more goals and assists in a big 5 league than any other u20 player did over the past 30+ years apart from Mbappe who had just 1 more. Amad doesn't even have 1000 minutes of professional football under his belt by the time he reached the age of 20.
huh? Amad definitely isn't quicker, the point was that at Amads age, Sancho had done something that only mbappe had surpassed of all teenagers over the past 30 years. Amad literally has done nothing in professional football by the age 20. Sancho is a generational player, amad is a youth player who if I were a betting man, I'd say will go the same way as Angel Gomes because IMO there isn't anything between them talent wise.Amad is quicker than Sancho and is 3 yrs younger.
The good thing about Sancho having those stat's is there should be a market for him in Germany if it doesn't work out with us.