pascell
Full Member
Sheff Utd lost 4-0 tonight, 1 point from 3 games under a new manager. I don't think it'd be a wise move to send him there
Right. This quote was from two weeks ago.Where have you been, mate. Rashford had his surgery soon 2 weeks ago and is certainly not considering another one, just for the fun of it.
That rank says it is 11th not 10th. 11 is not the top 10.
100% sounds like a porn actor
Loaning our biggest talent to a club that is getting walked over so far in the championship strikes me as a very very stupid idea
He's usually spot on when it comes to transfers in the lower leagues.
Exactly this. I understand that nobody watches us and just looks at results but understand that we are adjusting to a new system with a new manager who needs new players in. Rome wasn’t built in a day and all that.No it's not. It's entertaining but certainly not one of the best, it is however relevant to his United development, as you said. I'd be very comfortable loaning him to Sheffield United considering how well they looked after Henderson. By what @Blades1889 is saying, it sounds like they have an attacking manager, with a system that plays wingers and a lack of wingers to complete that system, which would suggest a significant amount of gametime opportunities.
I dunno, I think other than another Premier League club, it might be the best for him. And I’m not sure he’d get regular football at another Premier League club.Loaning our biggest talent to a club that is getting walked over so far in the championship strikes me as a very very stupid idea
Don’t the players and their agents have a large say in where they go? In agreement with the club too?Not to mention Garner going back to Forest who have lost their first three games. And then there's Pellistri going back to relegation candidates in Spain. Literally setting them up to play with poor players and look bad.
But wouldn’t Amad become one of your best players then?Exactly this. I understand that nobody watches us and just looks at results but understand that we are adjusting to a new system with a new manager who needs new players in. Rome wasn’t built in a day and all that.
I mean it wouldn’t be hard but it’s hard to say. He’s only actually played youth level for you bar a couple of times so who knows but he does look very talented. I don’t get what point you are making though. He’d play regularly for us giving him the chance to develop.But wouldn’t Amad become one of your best players then?
If he is the best player, than attacking gameplay may be built around him - it’s different from simply “having a lot of game time”.I don’t get what point you are making though.
If he’s as good as everyone on here makes him out to be then yes, attacking play would be built around him?If he is the best player, than attacking gameplay may be built around him - it’s different from simply “having a lot of game time”.
Don't really see the downside eitherIf he’s as good as everyone on here makes him out to be then yes, attacking play would be built around him?
Agreed mate. I remember just how good Fulham were under Jokanovic too. A Championship loan under a progressive manager like Jokanovic will do Amad wonders. The physicality of the league builds his weaknesses up and the style of play of the manager will suit him down to the ground.Exactly this. I understand that nobody watches us and just looks at results but understand that we are adjusting to a new system with a new manager who needs new players in. Rome wasn’t built in a day and all that.
Fulham started slow under Jokanovic too so…
We do intend to play football. Football that suits wide players for that matter. The problem is we need the players and Diallo has obviously been targeted as someone who fits the system the manager wants to play.The lad needs to play in a team that intends on trying to play football, absolute madness to send him to a team with no structure right now.
The lad needs to play in a team that intends on trying to play football, absolute madness to send him to a team with no structure right now.
Sorry to say but because of these decisions I dont think these 3 will make it here. Their career will be wasted with us.Not to mention Garner going back to Forest who have lost their first three games. And then there's Pellistri going back to relegation candidates in Spain. Literally setting them up to play with poor players and look bad.
Him going out on loan means Dan James will stay.
I’d like to see him at Brighton.
No chance Ole would sell James. He's an integral part of the squad in Ole's mind.
That's what I like to hear
With Amad, I have to say he's doing really, really well in training, he's come back a little later after the Olympics and now he's looking really good. I wouldn't be surprised if he stays as well. It has to be the right loan, the club, way of playing etc
Looks like he will be loaned out.