fecking Wan-Bissaka
I disagree. I don’t think wingers simply play on the other side by default, it is based on their strengths as players. Typically, wingers are now expected to score goals, and the current version of wingers has ended the two striker system and the #10 system, by and large. Now, wingers are there to share the #9 and #10 functions - as well as the traditional 7 and 11.
James is far more and old-school type. He has no creativity and little to no goal threat. He is fast, hardworking and a decent crosser, which makes him more of a 442 sort of winger than a 433 type. In short, he is best on the right. Just like Valencia was best on the right, not the left. Their qualities are similar.
I wonder if we will use him as a false 9 more often, he played it pretty well. I'd like to see him and Rashford on the left, he'd be picking out his runs constantly.
He could do the same from Bruno's position to be fair. I'm not too fond of false 9s you usually lose too much of a goal threat in exchange for mildly better ball circulation. Only an option if your strikers are injured for me.
Footballing wise I don't think he's too far off. A few tools could be sharpened but some fantastic glimmers too.
I think it's just speed of thought, adjusting to the league and a little bit of physicality. Some of that will come with experience and some with time.
I'm not sure what the best course is. My gut feeling is he should stay, progress in training, get some outings next year. On loan he could be wasted, we'd have to be 100% convinced to let such an asset go somewhere.
As long as your wide men are making runs in behind where the space is, and a 3rd man run from CM it's usually OK, just a different style.He could do the same from Bruno's position to be fair. I'm not too fond of false 9s you usually lose too much of a goal threat in exchange for mildly better ball circulation. Only an option if your strikers are injured for me.
I think false 9 is okay but the entire team needs to be geared towards it. It will work better for City or Barcelona than it will for Sam Allardyce. United simply don’t have enough midfielders who are careful enough with the ball for that system. It’s a system that draws all the forward players together and relies upon passing and moving. The team we played against Wolves is more of the profile for this type of game than one with Bruno, Scott, Fred, Pogba, Rashford etc.
As long as your wide men are making runs in behind where the space is, and a 3rd man run from CM it's usually OK, just a different style.
I know what you mean though it's nice to have a proper target man in the box, especially if you do cross regularly like we seem to.
He could probably play as a 10 happily though on days Fernandes needs a rest.
So Pep teams in other words, but still Pep's best Barca team had Samuel Eto'o or David Villa up front and his City team had Sergio Aguero up top. You can make false #9 work with the right set up as you say, but it's still sub-optimal to having a good striker.
Dan James can't be a LW because he's lacking massively on creativity and dribbling.
That’s my take. He’s a straight line player. Similar to Valencia. He has a vertical game, but not a horizontal one.
Both "vertical" or "horizontal" mean different things depending on your view of the orientation of the pitch.
I'd say he looks twice as impressive on the left than the right. When was the last time he crossed a ball like that from the right wing? it was absolutely perfect for Elangas goal. He made a nice run for the pass from Amad too, shame he spooned the chance.Dan James can't be a LW because he's lacking massively on creativity and dribbling.
@Rozay I reckon he and Hannibal are the best prospects we’ve brought in since Rooney Ronaldo DDG and Martial. It’s most likely going to take a few years until they become consistent though. This approach in the transfer market is the most fun but it can be hit and miss. Waiting until 18/19 when they’ve had minutes and paying the big money down is obviously more of a guarantee than just picking up random talented youth out of other academies but most of the same risks apply. We also need to keep an eye out for the right older players who can lead the young lads by example.
Indeed, although I wouldn’t put Amad and Hannibal in the same category of signing. Amad was on the fringes at Atalanta and already had a senior goal. He’s somewhere in between Hannibal and the likes of Ronaldo, Martial etc as signings.
I agree with you too, I don’t think we should avoid buying more established players by any means. As you said, they need players to lead by example. This was Arsene Wenger’s problem. He had a bunch of 20 year olds all trying to lead each other.
I do think that sometimes we need to adjust our approach of we feel we have a potential ‘generational’ talent. They have to be put on a clear 2,3,4 year programme to harvest a 100m player - just like Ronaldo was, just like Rashford was and Greenwood has been. Similarly the likes of Bellingham and Sancho at Dortmund, or Fati at Barca. I’d like us to have a good look at Amad before we sign another young right winger, as I feel the potential reward there could be huge. As you said, it will likely take a few years before they become consistent, but what mustn’t be forgotten is that it won’t simply take a few years. It will take a few years of playing football fairly regularly, as it did with all the other top players who were at big clubs in their teens. I think we should give him that football.
Ive seen you chatting about not getting Sancho but I think he’d still be a solid buy for a few reasons. The fact he’s English and would settle instantly is the most basic one. He’s going to be an important international player who should become a leader. His price has gone down to something resembling a no brainier. It might push the worst of Rashford Amad or Greenwood up or out over the next few seasons but there is space for the 4. We clearly need proper competition. Our forwards keep letting us down when the pressure is on. We’ve been way too flimsy when it comes to quality in depth and we are picking teams based on reputation instead of match winning actions and hard work.
Amad looks like he can play comfortably across a the front. He played pretty well as a false 9, he is very two footed, he will get games on either wing. Rashford will most likely miss a big chunk of the beginning of next season as well as he recovers from surgery. If we bring in Sancho he can play on the left while Rashford recovers and that means we won’t rush him back from injury.I’m a fan of Sancho. But I don’t realistically see him being competition for Rashford, not while Ole is manager. All I’m saying is, having bought one potential world beating young right winger, I’d hold off from buying another one until we’ve had a good look at the one we’ve bought.
If Sancho was being bought to fight on the left I’d be more for it. But if he’s bought for huge money to be a right winger at 21, I doubt we will ever really get to see what Amad could become. He will play majority of games on the right, and when he doesn’t, Greenwood will play there. Some may say that’s great, but it does then beg the question of why Amad was bought in the first place that’s all. I just want him to play football over the next couple of years so we can see if we are right and he can realise the potential that we claimed he has.
Amad looks like he can play comfortably across a the front. He played pretty well as a false 9, he is very two footed, he will get games on either wing. Rashford will most likely miss a big chunk of the beginning of next season as well as he recovers from surgery. If we bring in Sancho he can play on the left while Rashford recovers and that means we won’t rush him back from injury.
Also yes probably under Ole Rashford will be favoured in the left BUT, whilst I hope Ole succeeds here, I can’t really see him being here beyond the end of next season. Sancho and Amad will outlast him and possibly the next manager too.
Really hoping that our African youngsters get lots of senior football with their national teams and use the opportunity to gain some traction in their development