1. Turner
2. Hayden
3. Y. Khan
4. Vengsarkar
5. Border (C)
6. Chanderpaul
7. Boucher (WK)
8. Nawaz
9. Snow
10. Bond
11. Murali
Solid Middle Order.
1. Turner
2. Hayden
3. Y. Khan
4. Vengsarkar
5. Border (C)
6. Chanderpaul
7. Boucher (WK)
8. Nawaz
9. Snow
10. Bond
11. Murali
Need to get my eyes tested. I thought Boycott was in the team above you
Not necessarily. It depends on the skillset required for that position. An openers average is more important in number 1 & 2; I agree that 3-6 is largely alright though 6 requires a slightly different type of batsman.Really though, we have discussed this previously but using that cricinfo filter to pluck out averages for one position for both pointing out strength or weakness and doing so without much context can be misplaced arguments. A lot of batsmen averages get inflated if you look at one particular position.
Basically entire career stats by and large carry the most weightage.
Thanks Mani.Like your team moby,never heard of Ian Redpath will google on him anyway.
True and that's part of what I was saying. You've gone ahead and added context to the stat and not picked up Rahul Dravid's few innings as an opener and argued based on his stats at that position portraying that as evidence for him being a great opener. (Not that I think he wouldn't be but THAT is not an evidence for that case).Not necessarily. It depends on the skillset required for that position. An openers average is more important in number 1 & 2; I agree that 3-6 is largely alright though 6 requires a slightly different type of batsman.
Batsmen at 6 need to adjust to second new ball, he also one who need to pace his innings in short duration when it required.Not necessarily. It depends on the skillset required for that position. An openers average is more important in number 1 & 2; I agree that 3-6 is largely alright though 6 requires a slightly different type of batsman.
And possibly shepherd tail enders.Batsmen at 6 need to adjust to second new ball, he also one who need to pace his innings in short duration when it required.
Nice little read on Redpath, thanks for sharing Moby.Thanks Mani.
Yes, will try to do a write up on him. Essencially a tough as nails opener for Australia with massive reserves of concentration and determination as Greg Chappell says. A true fighter who would put a massive price on his wicket, which Steve Waugh would appreciate. Given he is surrounded by incredibly prolific run scorers like Cook, Abbas and Sachin, his grit and the fact that he can protect others against hostile bowling would be highly valuable.
Greg Chappell remembers his own Test debut. “My first innings in Test cricket was, as you might expect, a trying experience, but proved to be one of the best cricket lessons of my career, thanks to Ian Redpath. I came to the wicket with Australia reeling at 107 for five to join Redders [Redpath], who had watched three quick wickets fall at the other end. The English left me largely untouched while zeroing in on Redders— just about the toughest batsman to dislodge. They figured if they got him the tail would capitulate. John Snow put all his energy into trapping Redders down at his end and bombarding him. They picked the wrong bloke. Snowy would follow through right in Redder’s face. After each bouncer that he evaded with his trademark Redpath sway, he’d look at Snowy and mouth ‘Get f@#%ed’.”
For me a good no. 6 should be able to handle a collapse first and foremost. Coming in at 500-4 and scoring a few isn't contributing much but being able to come at a low score and being able to save the innings (hence VVS Laxman being a GOAT no.6) is a much bigger factor.Batsmen at 6 need to adjust to second new ball, he also one who need to pace his innings in short duration when it required.
Beat me to it haha.And possibly shepherd tail enders.
Yup, this as well.And possibly shepherd tail enders.
For me a good no. 6 should be able to handle a collapse first and foremost. Coming in at 500-4 and scoring a few isn't contributing much but being able to come at a low score and being able to save the innings (hence VVS Laxman being a GOAT no.6) is a much bigger factor.
That and the ability to stay at the crease in a situation where you have to see out the game and evidence of being able to play with tailenders. That quality should be there in one of your 5 or 6 ideally, so examples of Steve Waugh etc weigh highly in that area.
Those are the main qualities a no. 6 needs especially in fantasy game where most of the run scoring will be done by the specialists ahead of you. Unless you are someone special like Gilchrist who can turn a 40 run lead to a 200 run lead without breaking a sweat and turn the game around.
I remember that match. By the time Gilly came in to bat, I thought it was done and dusted and a matter of time before Pak win the game. How wrong I was. If I remember correctly, Gilly was playing only his 2nd or 3rd testSpeaking about long innings and batsmen who put more importance to their wkts, M.Yousuf, Chanderpaul,Dravid,Langer,Thrope,Boycott,Gavaskar,A.Flower and few other(whom i might have missed on first instinct) they never going to give their wickets that easily.
Coming to no.6 one special innings I would always remember is Langer and Gilly vs Pakistan 1999.That was special against very good attack.
http://www.cricketcountry.com/artic...ist-scripted-the-great-escape-at-hobart-19977
@Skills your favourite player finally got picked
Ian Bell
Everyone had same options when we watched it.I remember that match. By the time Gilly came in to bat, I thought it was done and dusted and a matter of time before Pak win the game. How wrong I was. If I remember correctly, Gilly was playing only his 2nd or 3rd test
damn it moby
whats the context here boys..
Quite the collection of pure unadulterated hatred.