Synco
Lucio's #1 Fan
- Joined
- Jul 19, 2014
- Messages
- 6,724
The roster has been filled in the meantime, but you could look for an assistant manager spot, if you want.I’ll do it
Would be nice if you'd zoom in for the match discussions.
The roster has been filled in the meantime, but you could look for an assistant manager spot, if you want.I’ll do it
Would be nice if you'd zoom in for the match discussions.
I guess there's still time tomorrow to discuss this and other open questions. Would be good if some more playing managers say something about it as well.Thanks for the tag @Synco , will watch keenly who picks whom (managers wise)
I agree with the Di Stefano conundrum and think having a small blocked list will help the philosophies shine much more.
The issue we should discuss first is not this or that specific player, but the general question if the draft idea gains or loses when the goatiest GOATs are removed.Pele, Messi, Fenomeno, Di Stefano, Cristiano, Garrincha, Muller, Cruyff
Xavi, Matthaus, Rijkaard, Neeskens, Platini, Maradona
Cafu, Maldini, Facchetti, Carlos Alberto
Baresi, Beckenbauer, Nesta, Kohler, Figueroa
Another problem might be that some drafters may have already based their manager choices on the availability of these players. In that case, please speak up.
A fellow drafter, who prefers to remain anonymous, has proposed a block list for über-GOATs
The issue we should discuss first is not this or that specific player, but the general question if the draft idea gains or loses when the goatiest GOATs are removed.
Another problem might be that some drafters may have already based their manager choices on the availability of these players. In that case, please speak up.
So what do you think, yay or nay?
I think the block list would be shorter, only concentrating on a few über-GOATs.I'd be okay with that. It's a shame that you won't see Xavi in Mourinho's team, but it makes sense to block a few GOATs to bring more focus on manager's style and team-building.
Gullit is one player that I would add. Bastard fits any team and every philosophy. Almost a cheat pick for a draft like this.
I'd prefer a restricted list (only allowed 1 or 2 of the all time greats) rather than a complete ban on them.
Agree with this. In a draft like this you wouldn't want to compile goats either way as it will disrupt the balance.I'd prefer a restricted list (only allowed 1 or 2 of the all time greats) rather than a complete ban on them.
Agree with this. Makes more sense to block players who can sort of fit in everywhere.
Don't quite get this - why is that so? I mean, if a player is flexible, good on the drafter.Blocking players like Nedved, Gullit and Iniesta makes more sense rather than Maradona and Pele.
Because when you put Gullit in a possession set up, counter attacking set up, right wing, SS, AM, there will be no questions asked and he will be considered great pick.Don't quite get this - why is that so? I mean, if a player is flexible, good on the drafter.
(I also don't agree Gullit and Iniesta fit every team easily.)
One thing I'll adopt in any case is a reinforcement rule Physio had in his Oasis Draft:
Picks 1+2 are blocked for reinforcements for the whole tournament.
I see, so it's about the possibility to be combined with GOATs at will. Makes sense.Because when you put Gullit in a possession set up, counter attacking set up, right wing, SS, AM, there will be no questions asked and he will be considered great pick.
Same with Iniesta and Nedved - being able to operate wide and in the middle in different kinds of set ups.
If you put Maradona on the wing or alongside say Platini it will be an off fit right away. If you put Messi as a false 9 with an orthodox right/left winger he'll be questioned and seen as ill fit.
In an open pool GOAT's will be a huge plus, but in this draft it's the versatile players that would get more appreciation and used almost as a cheat code.
I think I'll go with only 1 player from a list of ~25 difference makers and Physio's RR rule. Too goaty otherwise.Personally I think allowing 2 picks from that block list would be enough without blocking picks 1 + 2 in RR. This way drafters can drop their first pick if they were say 16th in the pecking order and pick another 1st round pick from the top seeds.
Generally 1+2 picks being blocked give advantage to those on top of the snake as they get their hands on the best players, whilst the ones on the bottom can't pick them at all.
Not entirely sure about Nesta, Kohler, Cafu, Facchetti because of the one player limit, but I tend to leave them in.Beckenbauer, Baresi, Figueroa, Nesta, Kohler, Maldini, Cafu, Facchetti
Rijkaard, Matthäus
Maradona, Di Stefano, Platini
Pele, Messi, Cruyff, Puskas, Zico, Gullit, Best, Garrincha, C. Ronaldo, Eusebio
Fenomeno, Müller, Van Basten
Preliminary list - each drafter can pick only one player. Inspired bySjor'smystery man's list from above, but changed around somewhat.
Not entirely sure about Nesta, Kohler, Cafu, Facchetti because of the one player limit, but I tend to leave them in.
Zico/Puskas in but Zidane/Charlton out may be a thin line, but the line has to be drawn somewhere. Don't want the list to be too extensive.
Can be discussed for the next 5 hours (including Nedved, Iniesta, Neeskens), then I'll make a decision so we can commence.
Personally I'd remove Cafu from the list - Carlos Alberto, Djalma, Zanetti, etc doesn't really make a much of a difference or drop in quality and we need to stop somewhere.Preliminary list - each drafter can pick only one player. Inspired bySjor'smystery man's list from above, but changed around somewhat.
Not entirely sure about Nesta, Kohler, Cafu, Facchetti because of the one player limit, but I tend to leave them in.
Zico/Puskas in but Zidane/Charlton out may be a thin line, but the line has to be drawn somewhere. Don't want the list to be too extensive.
Can be discussed for the next 8 hours (including Nedved, Iniesta, Neeskens), then I'll make a decision so we can finally commence.
Also don't think Kohler, Eusebio and Puskas belong there. (I don't see Puskas as someone who gets the same love as Van Basten/Muller).
Especially Eusebio, who's hardly an easy sell for most setups and isn't one who gets a lot of love. Might be the draft for him to shine.
I thought hard about these two. The reasoning was that a possible Maradona/Eusebio or Puskas/Pele attack would simply be too much.Would remove Eusebio from the list on the basis that he's a player that you can expect him being polemic in his use (as as SS, CF, left right, etc), so it would be interesting to see how he's used in particular set up and whether or not he would be a good fit in a particular set up. Same for Puskas really.
This.Generally 1+2 picks being blocked give advantage to those on top of the snake as they get their hands on the best players, whilst the ones on the bottom can't pick them at all.
The reasoning was that a possible Maradona/Eusebio or Puskas/Pele attack would simply be too much.
Targets:Need to be clear about the purpose of the block list. Is it to reduce the number of GOATs or is it to reduce the number who seamlessly slip into any set-up?
(...)
Obviously we can try to both limit the number of GOATs and reduce the seamless fits, but I just think we need to be clear on what it is we want to achieve first.
As stated above the list, one player only. I agree with @Gio that the integration of some players (for me: Cruyff, Di Stefano, C. Ronaldo, Beckenbauer and a few more) will be interesting in the context of the manager theme, so I don't want to block them entirely. With others it might be less interesting, that's true.Oh, so you are allowing people from the blocked list? I was not aware of that.
Personally, I don't like it. This is a draft about the managers and allowing the Goats will make the discussion centralized around whether the goat fits the manager's philosophy a lot of times.
After the goat heavy last draft which frankly became uninteresting to follow from a neutral point of view from the semis, I don't think people should mind a draft without a handful of them.
Edit: My suggestion would be a complete block on the players from the list and blocking round 1 picks only during reinforcements. Round 2 picks should already be diluted due to the reinforcements, so should be okay.
Cool. #2 makes sense and I'm always down with #1 because just about every draft is an all-time pool these days, so it's good to keep it fresh. Perhaps the least agenda-driven way to cut it is to look at Physio's P&G draft player transfer list and chop off or limit players above a certain value (eg everyone above £120m and defender above £100m - just an example I haven't thought about it).Targets:
#1 drastically reduce the available goat power per team
#2 remove the most obvious wingman cheats (Gullit, Puskas, Eusebio)
Oh, so you are allowing people from the blocked list? I was not aware of that.
Personally, I don't like it. This is a draft about the managers and allowing the Goats will make the discussion centralized around whether the goat fits the manager's philosophy a lot of times.
After the goat heavy last draft which frankly became uninteresting to follow from a neutral point of view from the semis, I don't think people should mind a draft without a handful of them.
Edit: My suggestion would be a complete block on the players from the list and blocking round 1 picks only during reinforcements. Round 2 picks should already be diluted due to the reinforcements, so should be okay.
Cool. #2 makes sense and I'm always down with #1 because just about every draft is an all-time pool these days, so it's good to keep it fresh. Perhaps the least agenda-driven way to cut it is to look at Physio's P&G draft player transfer list and chop off or limit players above a certain value (eg everyone above £120m and defender above £100m - just an example I haven't thought about it).
That list would be too extensive for my liking. Many of the "cheaper" ones are cool options for the manager theme.Peaches and a GOAT players worth £100m or more -
Yeah, spot on. Obviously the merit of a block list in all time draft is perfectly fine if we don't follow a theme, but in the current draft GOAT's won't really be as much beneficial if we(and voters) stay true on the theme.Need to be clear about the purpose of the block list. Is it to reduce the number of GOATs or is it to reduce the number who seamlessly slip into any set-up? The two lists are quite different IMO. Several of the GOATs are actually terribly tricky to fit into different set-ups and we hold varying views on how they should be best deployed - Di Stefano, Xavi, Puskas, Eusebio, Cruyff. I can see fitting in those players being an interesting aspect of this draft. Whereas the likes of Figueroa, Rijkaard, Desailly, Pele, Gullit and Nedved can be plonked into any set-up alongside any partner no questions asked.
Obviously we can try to both limit the number of GOATs and reduce the seamless fits, but I just think we need to be clear on what it is we want to achieve first.
Won't happen.We should block Pavel Nedved??
That list would be too extensive for my liking. Many of the "cheaper" ones are cool options for the manager theme.
Anyway: the top players of these three lists are identical with the ones in my proposal above, which is a good sign. First 5 defenders, first 4 midfielders, first 11 forwards. Subtract a few defenders from my list & add the wingman cheats, and it's pretty much the same ranking.
--------------------Why don't you write out you revised proposed block list and the reasoning and then we can go from there?
Beckenbauer, Baresi, Figueroa, Nesta, Maldini, Facchetti
Rijkaard, Matthäus
Maradona, Di Stefano, Platini
Pele, Messi, Cruyff, Puskas, Zico, Gullit, Best, Garrincha, C. Ronaldo, Eusebio
Fenomeno, Müller, Van Basten
Would be my preference. Not a block list, but only one pick per drafter.Targets:
#1 drastically reduce the available goat power per team
#2 remove the most obvious wingman cheats (Gullit, Puskas, Eusebio)