RooneyLegend
New Member
- Joined
- May 3, 2013
- Messages
- 12,963
No way we concede less with him in goal. He's never been as good as DDG who can save a game by himself.
Yeah I meant saves, not appearances but I kept going when rereading my post. Was a bit early in the morning to be fair!
Feck even then it makes it worse for Alisson.
350 appearances for David, 110 for Alisson. Stats show David shits over the Liverpool keeper in high balls etc.Does Alisson just not come for them? Still don’t se me what’s impressive? Where are these stats that he excels at?
He's really not. In fact his positioning is generally appalling.Surely you understand how important positioning is for a keeper? De Gea is really good at it. Mignolet had terrible positioning. His starting shape was always off as well.
This is ridiculous, we would concede considerably less goals with him in goal. Look at the difference in our defenders both defensively and their overall game with an offensive goalkeeper like Henderson in goal last season & then crank that up several levels with Allison and we'd see a much better defensive unit.No way we concede less with him in goal. He's never been as good as DDG who can save a game by himself.
In that particular game they could’ve played with a training cone as a keeper and not much would’ve changed to be fair.He is an exceptional goalkeeper, heck if people didn't see the ridiculous difference in standards two weeks ago when he was on the same pitch as De Gea then I don't know what people watch.
Oh really? So Ronaldo and Fernandes both running clean through on goal in the first half before the game was out of sight wouldn't have scored past a training cone?In that particular game they could’ve played with a training cone as a keeper and not much would’ve changed to be fair.
I remember the Ronaldo chance now, sorry. It wasn’t a serious comment and I probably shouldn’t have made it as the events of that game are getting actively repressed by my memory.Oh really? So Ronaldo and Fernandes both running clean through on goal in the first half before the game was out of sight wouldn't have scored past a training cone?
@cyberman
Even if you wilfully ignore all the sweeper keeper stuff that DDG doesn’t do, look at the crosses stopped and save % and tell me he’s a better keeper than Allison. He’s clearly a level below.
Yeah Allison is comfortably better at practically everything. The fact that he's got a better save % and performs better against post shot xg puts a lie to anyone claiming De Gea's shot stopping ability makes him a better keeper.
So Allison is shite now is he? Ok who are the better keepers than him in the league? I can't think of a single one.
Mendy? Not sure about Mendy's passing but shot stopping and crossing collection has to be up there. That said, I've not checked this out via statistical analysis and am going on eye test.
All those things, minus footage, are not proof of him not being overrated. In fact they're the very reason he is. Thanks for backing me up. His clean sheet awards - big whoop. That's Liverpool playing so well again.It's really incredible. No one can give you anything aside from the stats, footage, individual awards, team trophies and personal opinion. I mean, what else do you need? Seriously, what argument can theoretically convince you?
Our keeper genuinely was the best keeper in the world and saved us from being far far worse for a long timeIf only our keeper were as shite as Alisson the past few seasons we might have won some silverware in that time.
Literally no one has said it's one game. He's just made it extra obvious again so were talking about it. No one is arguing De Gea is currently better either. The whole thing has been about Alisson being overrated.He had one really bad game and all of a sudden he's shite....
There's no way anyone can argue that current De Gea is anywhere near him in terms of overall quality and contribution to the team.
I tend to use my eyes when I’m watching football, thank you. The thing is — you’re stating quite a contrarian opinion that’s not based on any evidence aside from your personal assessment and accuse others of not providing enough evidence. That’s not how arguments work.All those things, minus footage, are not proof of him not being overrated. In fact they're the very reason he is. Thanks for backing me up. His clean sheet awards - big whoop. That's Liverpool playing so well again.
If you actually watch full games, the footage says very different things, if you can look at him with an honest eye and not one that's been skewed my media and meaningless simplistic stats. Just use your eyes. Show me the footage if you like. I'm not interested in seeing his 1v1s. I've said he's good at those.
Stats aren't everything either. They're almost always completely devoid of any wider context.I tend to use my eyes when I’m watching football, thank you. The thing is — you’re stating quite a contrarian opinion that’s not based on any evidence aside from your personal assessment and accuse others of not providing enough evidence. That’s not how arguments work.
It’s not just stats though. If we were arguing by only using his stats, it would be one thing. As for him being overrated — that depends on, we’ll, who is rating him. He was certainly one of the best — and the most complete keepers in the world for a couple of seasons. He has slowed down a bit since then and I don’t think that he’s among the very best in the world now, but he still is probably the best and the most complete keeper in the league at the moment. Ederson is also brilliant, but he’s more of a specialist. Is this overrating?Stats aren't everything either. They're almost always completely devoid of any wider context.
They may prove he's decent. They don't prove he's not overrated.
He's being found out more now Liverpool don't play quite as well. Especially obvious when he lost his defence, which was apparently great because of his organisation.
I'm yet to see much video evidence of him being as great as he's been made out over the years. Whenever I've asked for it I've been shown the same one save. I think he's actually quite average at most of it, aside from 1v1s, and that's been shown whenever he's actually been tested (Liverpool playing as well/worse defence).It’s not just stats though. If we were arguing by only using his stats, it would be one thing. As for him being overrated — that depends on, we’ll, who is rating him. He was certainly one of the best — and the most complete keepers in the world for a couple of seasons. He has slowed down a bit since then and I don’t think that he’s among the very best in the world now, but he still is probably the best and the most complete keeper in the league at the moment. Ederson is also brilliant, but he’s more of a specialist. Is this overrating?
Stats aren't everything either. They're almost always completely devoid of any wider context.
They may prove he's decent. They don't prove he's not overrated.
He's being found out more now Liverpool don't play quite as well. Especially obvious when he lost his defence, which was apparently great because of his organisation.
And just to clarify, once again, I'm saying he's overrated. Not that De Gea is currently better, not that he is actually terrible, or that he's not one of the better keepers in the league. Just that he's overrated because of clean sheets, and Liverpool seemingly getting better over the entire pitch when he arrived (I mean come on).
Because it doesn't take in to account what's actually happened on the pitch behind those stats.You’ll have to explain why stats which compare Allison with other keepers need more context in a discussion about how he compares with other keepers.
The over-rated thing is subjective to the point of meaninglessness.
Literally no one has said it's one game. He's just made it extra obvious again so were talking about it. No one is arguing De Gea is currently better either. The whole thing has been about Alisson being overrated.
Yup. Scores high on just about every ‘nip-stuff-in-the-bud-before-it-implodes’ metric out there. Aside from Oblak who’s been operating in his own tier the last 4-5 years, I don’t see anyone else to top Alisson.He’s brilliant one on one, mops up everything behind the back four, decisive on high balls into the box, very rarely beaten with long range shots (can’t actually remember one this season?) and comfortable with the ball at his feet. I don’t think there are any other keepers better than him. His stats are insanely good too. Which really just backs up my opinion here.
Yup. Scores high on just about every ‘nip-stuff-in-the-bud-before-it-implodes’ metric out there. Aside from Oblak who’s been operating in his own tier the last 4-5 years, I don’t see anyone else to top Alisson.
I don’t watch Italian football but would Donnarumma run him close? He was seriously impressive in the Euros.
Interesting the way Serie A seems to be so good at churning out the best keepers.
I don't watch much Italian footy either but I agree this guy was awesome at the Euros. Maybe not the best with the ball at his feet but one could live that when considering how good the rest of his game looked. Has a massive frame and reach and fantastic at saving pens. Can imagine he comes and catches any high ball into the box no problem.
Because it doesn't take in to account what's actually happened on the pitch behind those stats.
Just checked his stats on fbref and they’re a good bit worse than Allison’s for everything (except saving penalties)
The whole point is that stats don't provide the wider picture. That's common knowledge. Stats will show he's saved x amount of long shots, you'll say he's great at them then. Yet in reality he's barely had one to save that's actually challenged him.What? You want stats that do a worse job of isolating goalkeeping performances in order to compare goalkeepers?
The whole point is that stats don't provide the wider picture. That's common knowledge. Stats will show he's saved x amount of long shots, you'll say he's great at them then. Yet in reality he's barely had one to save that's actually challenged him.
I'm sure you'll have a +/- xSgNa stat to 'prove' otherwise but they clearly don't take wider context in to account either.