How long is a train journey from London to Manchester, 3 hours?
about 2 hours give or take
(only to answer the question, not to suggest he's on one)
-
In the latest episode of the United Hour Podcast, Nik (@Rood) and Jamie (@Vault Dweller) are here to talk about United's dreadful home defeat at the hands of Big Ange's Tottenham Hotspur. Should this have been the end of Ten Hag? How long does he actually have left? And does Nik finally want ETH out?!
- Status
about 2 hours give or take
(only to answer the question, not to suggest he's on one)
Until he is spotted with Jose on his smart watch then I refuse to believe.
He's being funny. Implying Mkhi's worth is negative.
No I don't think Di Marzio/The Guardian said that. They said £25m or Miki involved in the deal, but fans started tweeting that we offered £25m+Miki and it's spread.
That makes no sense.
Why are people discussing the obvious train story WUM 
These days, the ticket costs more than the transfer.
Wouldn't frozen in this context mean set in stone, i.e the transfer is done? I assume Alexis to be "winter" in that analogy.
You boys know there are two clubs in Manchester, right? And where is Matacopter?
No see the follow up tweet
Is Mkhi Targaryen heading south yet?
There is no train people
No clue if you're taking the piss or you're serious, either way its on like donkey kong
Cant see tweets. What did it say?
Was referring to the transfer/signing fees. But you're right, if Sanchez is moving this month, he'll wage demands will no doubt have increased.
Jesus back in 2-3 weeks might be relevant.
Well my mate is not sure - he says the Krankies are giving nothing away, just sat in stony silence.No clue if you're taking the piss or you're serious, either way its on like donkey kong
I would guess it would be more like "We'll pay you £25m for Sanchez, and you have our permission approach Mkhitaryan"
Even in his current form shouldn't we be expecting to be up cash wise here? I mean surely Mkhitaryan is a 40m player?
40? Nah, no more than 30
@M18CTID - what’s the feeling on this one with the ITK’s on Bluemoon?
I know Pogba is supposedly on around £280k, but Lukaku? That would be ridiculous. Where was that reported?
Yeah The Guardian said that "United offer Mkhitaryan as make weight", so we'd be open for them to take Miki in return as part of the deal. But, it didn't say we offered £25m+Miki. That's about £50m and if you also factor in the agent fees and signing bonus, that goes up to about £70m for a player with 5/6 months left on his contract. So, I think there's very little chance the offer was Miki+£25m.
That's how much we paid for him 2 years ago when he had 1 year left on his contract, different market now surely?
It means we're paying them 5m more to take Mikhitaryan.
Different player as well.
They're stuck in traffic.
The feeling should be that those ITK's chat nonsense.
He had an immense season for Dortmund with 15 assists and 11 goals in 28+3 appearances, being arguably the best player in the Bundesliga that season. He’s been poor for us, that’s the difference.
He is 29 at end of Jan and has hardly set the prem alight, but maybe it’s a no cash offer just Mkhi
This is the series of events i think that has happened-
I think it is the former, i also think most of the cafe thinks it is the former,i do think we are not stupid for trying, we may end up failing, but shows the intent. I do think interest is genuine, so is our offer to take him away,But we have been done over by ronaldo,cesc, Bale, Grizzy etc on too many occasions that we are rightly very cautious.
- City obviously want him, planned to take him in summer, Moved plans to now.
- Agents ask same fee they were asking for in summer, along with arsenal asking a fee of upto 35 million + a replacement
- City dont agree to pay the sums for now, offer their own contract +sign on fees
- United were always interested, must have been told by agents he is goin to city, united kept up to date with story
- After city's apparent refusal to match Sanchez demands, United were offered the player either to shock city into paying more or for really a transfer
- United need sanchez more than city, Hence offer better deal, which is being negotiated as of now.
- No fee agreed with Arsenal, neither do arse have a replacement so they do not sell yet.
I think it is the former, i also think most of the cafe thinks it is the former,i do think we are not stupid for trying, we may end up failing, but shows the intent. I do think interest is genuine, so is our offer to take him away,But we have been done over by ronaldo,cesc, Bale, Grizzy etc on too many occasions that we are rightly very cautious.
Got a feeling we’re going to sign him.
- Status