Just seen a picture of him in a United top. Its either a really good photoshop or its done lads.
Just seen a picture of him in a United top. Its either a really good photoshop or its done lads.
Probably true and I actually think further east is the main source these days. But the population of India is what works in favour of the joke. If I had said "all the kids in Myanmar" then it's slightly harder to imagine, not least because most have little idea of the population of the country, whereas everyone knows that India and China have the largest populations. The humour scales with the number of imagined child slaves, in dire conditions, stitching our seasonal garb.Bangladesh mostly. I dont see any of such sweatshops in in
Don't get me wrong people but i would be still surprised if we get him. He wants to leave Arsenal for the lack of trophies and being brutally honest City are and will be (at least for the foreseeable future) the best place to win titles in English and European football.
Don't get me wrong people but i would be still surprised if we get him. He wants to leave Arsenal for the lack of trophies and being brutally honest City are and will be (at least for the foreseeable future) the best place to win titles in English and European football.
I want him, class player who will elevate us.
Forseeable future you say? How many years you reckon, 3,5,7?
Just seen a picture of him in a United top. Its either a really good photoshop or its done lads.
God I hope we'll win something, anything after those 3 years.max 2-3 years, he's 29 and won't care much what happens after that period of time
Just seen a picture of him in a United top. Its either a really good photoshop or its done lads.
"Betraying"
I love this narrative that has appeared in the last few days. Somehow City and United have switched places. The self-sufficient football club that is among the biggest in the world and has been for a few decades now has somehow become the "money", and the middle-eastern oil bank-rolled club who have only been any good for about 8 years (and have only been really good for about 5 months) are now the "honour".
The old cliche of football not existing before 1992 seems to have been shortened to football not existing prior to August last year, with some vague and hazy flashbacks of Pep being at Barcelona now and again, but that was pre-football; the blueprint for what would become football, established 2017.
Shouldve had Pep's bald head instead of the crownIt's going to come down to the dogs decision, isn't it?
It's going to come down to the dogs decision, isn't it?
I think this is the crux of the dynamic. They are so desperate for United to fade into obscurity it hurts the when they see signs that won't happen.
It's possible the dogs ate pep.Shouldve had Pep's bald head instead of the crown
It's going to come down to the dogs decision, isn't it?
It's going to come down to the dogs decision, isn't it?
Is there any glory though in joining city mid season when they've more or less got it sewn up?
Imagine if they go on a shit run now they've lost and we make a race of it!
Those 3 damn draws over Xmas likely to prove costly though.
rawk worthyQatar fund ISIS FFS.......QATAR FUND ISIS.
Yeah I can't stand the narrative, I know the press have their agenda but this is too much. As if it's such a bad thing for a player to go for a challenge rather than a gimme title. I don't recall this Pep vs whatever bullshit when VVD turned City down.I also love this idea that moving for a guaranteed trophy is somehow a laudable choice. As if Sanchez will have had anything to do with the PL trophy he'd be lifting in the summer if he went to City.
Going to United he'd be taking on a similar sort of responsibility and challenge that he did when he went to Arsenal - to be a key attacker, a star player and leader, for a team pushing for trophies but with a real job on their hands getting there. Moving to City means he can basically coast along and collect the free trophy at the end of the season regardless of how well he does or how hard he works.
Next year is too far, I doubt City will replicate their form of the first part of this season. They’re going to start juggling three serious competitions and if they drop more points in the next month then pressure is going to affect their formThe dog without the crown surely represents the Champions League trophy.
rawk worthy
Turning down City for money?
LOLOLOLOLOL
The money there is from winning itThe dog without the crown surely represents the Champions League trophy.
"Betraying"
I love this narrative that has appeared in the last few days. Somehow City and United have switched places. The self-sufficient football club that is among the biggest in the world and has been for a few decades now has somehow become the "money", and the middle-eastern oil bank-rolled club who have only been any good for about 8 years (and have only been really good for about 5 months) are now the "honour".
The old cliche of football not existing before 1992 seems to have been shortened to football not existing prior to August last year, with some vague and hazy flashbacks of Pep being at Barcelona now and again, but that was pre-football; the blueprint for what would become football, established 2017.
It's going to come down to the dogs decision, isn't it?
Look at that headline?
£10 million in agent fees is only £3 million more than the £7 million Chelsea paid to get Ross Barclay. Alexis>Barclay. That £3 million is more than justified in that sense. So why no outrage over the monies paid to get Barclay?
The ABUs really can't handle the idea that we might be getting Alexis, eh?
@Macern #2nd place in thread count! Ripping it up like me and the crew for the Pogba summer
@VanGaalEra @ChaddyP