Ban
New Member
Oooooooh yes.Yeah fairly, he’s the London clubs correspondent for the Guardian.
Oooooooh yes.Yeah fairly, he’s the London clubs correspondent for the Guardian.
I'd think if he's joining us we'll hear within the next couple of days or so. The longer it goes on, the more chance he's going to City. That's the way I see it, anyway.It's close to decision time. He's definitely moving this month.
The big difference is that (as our own manager alluded to) City have outspent everyone else and show little sign of needing to stop doing so. Whereas Chelsea had a rather backwards transfer window following their PL win. That's been a big problem for them, especially given that (unlike City) they won the league on a very thin squad untroubled by CL demands.
John Cross of Mirror is fairly reliable for Arsenal as well I think.Sami Mokbel fot the Mail who's good quite good for Arsenal news reckons he's heading here.
Yes he is.Cross is good with Arsenal stuff isn't he, I'd love to believe.
Cross was absolutely adamant he's of to City on Friday.
I will be interested to see how attractive City are as a club without Pep.
So many transfers is ‘he want to play for Pep’ not Manchester City. That seems to be their only lure is their manager.
My feelings are I understand why Sanchez would go to City. However he surely can’t feel any sense of achievement if he went there and won the league. Plus the fact there is no guarantee he will start. I imagine this would be an issue because that was the reason he left Barcelona.
We need him more than City. He can have the number 7. We can offer the same wages. There is a chance to win trophies as much as there is at City even though some supporters think their isn’t. I would be amazed if City blitz the league again next season like they have this year, a lot of the league seem to have already given up this season.
Yeah, the club who've spunked 400m in two seasons on a squad which already contained Silva, KDB and Aguero are the moral bastions of the game...Reports are we’ve offered a much better deal than City and they can’t/won’t match it.
35mil to Arsenal
10mil agent fees
350k a week
And a reported 15mil sign on fee.
Now who knows if any of that is true but bet your bottom dollar if he chooses City it will be portrayed as a moral victory by the media and a player turning down money for the love of football and so on.
I also thought about this and wondered why I just don't call and ask him , but then realized I have much more important work to do today!Yeah, but which one!
If he was 99% set on joining City it would have taken something extraordinary to change his mind so presumably that's what we're trying to do.You could sell it as we just wanted him more than City, but that doesn't really stick to the narrative the media have going on at the moment.
Way too much criticism of a valid point to an extent?
Is there something United can offer him that city cant? More money maybe.
Is there something City can offer him that United can't? A squad ready to win loads in his last few years on the top.
Its good to be proud, but good to be practical too.
I doubt RAWK will be quiet about it so add that to the joy list.If he does sign for us we get joy on three fronts; we get arsenalfantv havibg a meltdown, bluemoon melting down more than usual and we get a quality player.
I don’t think this is necessarily true. They spent a sizeable sum (can’t remember the exact figures but I think it was £150m), they just didn’t buy very well.
Apart from Morata all their buys were substitute type players. Which is just bizarre considering the array of good youngsters who can sit on the bench. Not a single one of their transfers in the summer strengthened their first 11.