Jesus Christ some people are trying to say he’s actually had a decent game against Leicester? He barely looked like he knew how to play football. If your standards are that low we should still have Moyes
Interesting things statistics, you can play really poorly and they try and tell you the opposite.
While true, if converted he could have something to show in the assist column which is far more significant. Nothing he could do about it though.
How on earth is an arbitrary stat in any way more significant? And he got an assist for taking a speculative snapshot which was blocked and then instinctively and completely unnecessarily hand-balled did he not? A piece of nonsense.
Attacking players are judged by goals and assists. The first thing when evaluating a player would be the amount of Goals and Assists contributed. The chances he created for Lukaku and Mata were genuine goal scoring one so that is no nonsense.
Internet fans judge attacking players by their numbers.
Managers judge them by their overall contribution.
Iniesta had shit numbers for much of his career. The only imortant statistic is how many goals the team scores thanks to the presence of its individuals.
It's better to have an individual attacker who scores 10 goals himself but facilitates 70 team goals, rather than one who scores 20 individual goals but facilitates only 40 team goals. Of course, it's difficult to argue the point on an online forum. But that's where we are.
Sanchez forces the issue against every opposition team. He doesn't wait to be invited to attack and he doesn't hesitate to drive forward. Despite his relative lack of goals, he's been a breath of fresh air for United. The most cavalier forward we've had in years.
Attacking players will be judged on their goals and assists no doubt, but never exclusively. Evaluating a player just by looking at their goals and assists is laughable. Being credited with an assist for the penalty is (or would have been, if he wasn’t) a nonsense. Is it impossible for one attacker to have a better game than another when the later has scored or assisted and the former has not? Of course it’s not.
Do you believe we bought Sanchez to be a ‘presence on the pitch’? He’s a goal scoring forward with creative flair, and that’s why we bought him - to score and create. At the moment, he’s just frustrating. He keeps giving the ball away and dawdling in possession. Not what we need for the wide positions at all, especially considering we don’t exactly have a hugely prolific goal scorer in Lukaku yet.Internet fans judge attacking players by their numbers.
Managers judge them by their overall contribution.
Iniesta had shit numbers for much of his career. The only imortant statistic is how many goals the team scores thanks to the presence of its individuals.
It's better to have an individual attacker who scores 10 goals himself but facilitates 70 team goals, rather than one who scores 20 individual goals but facilitates only 40 team goals. Of course, it's difficult to argue the point on an online forum. But that's where we are.
Sanchez forces the issue against every opposition team. He doesn't wait to be invited to attack and he doesn't hesitate to drive forward. Despite his relative lack of goals, he's been a breath of fresh air for United. The most cavalier forward we've had in years.
Ofcourse starts aren't everything. Sanchez is under pressure to perform and he'd like his assist tally to show up as 2 instead of 0. First game of the season and it would've boosted his confidence. Also he wasn't awarded the assist for penalty if you're wondering.
I can only assume that by cavalier you mean runs around a lot and chases after the ball. Rooney used to do the same after his talent had declined.Last season he was so far below the standard of player he was 3 years ago it was embarrassing that we were paying him so much.Internet fans judge attacking players by their numbers.
Managers judge them by their overall contribution.
Iniesta had shit numbers for much of his career. The only imortant statistic is how many goals the team scores thanks to the presence of its individuals.
It's better to have an individual attacker who scores 10 goals himself but facilitates 70 team goals, rather than one who scores 20 individual goals but facilitates only 40 team goals. Of course, it's difficult to argue the point on an online forum. But that's where we are.
Sanchez forces the issue against every opposition team. He doesn't wait to be invited to attack and he doesn't hesitate to drive forward. Despite his relative lack of goals, he's been a breath of fresh air for United. The most cavalier forward we've had in years.
Internet fans judge attacking players by their numbers.
Managers judge them by their overall contribution.
Iniesta had shit numbers for much of his career. The only imortant statistic is how many goals the team scores thanks to the presence of its individuals.
It's better to have an individual attacker who scores 10 goals himself but facilitates 70 team goals, rather than one who scores 20 individual goals but facilitates only 40 team goals. Of course, it's difficult to argue the point on an online forum. But that's where we are.
Sanchez forces the issue against every opposition team. He doesn't wait to be invited to attack and he doesn't hesitate to drive forward. Despite his relative lack of goals, he's been a breath of fresh air for United. The most cavalier forward we've had in years.
A fair point. but we've only scored 3+ goals in a game three times since Sanchez joined, and failed to score at all in seven! Before he joined last season, we scored 3+ goals nine times, and failed to score only four times.Internet fans judge attacking players by their numbers.
Managers judge them by their overall contribution.
Iniesta had shit numbers for much of his career. The only imortant statistic is how many goals the team scores thanks to the presence of its individuals.
It's better to have an individual attacker who scores 10 goals himself but facilitates 70 team goals, rather than one who scores 20 individual goals but facilitates only 40 team goals. Of course, it's difficult to argue the point on an online forum. But that's where we are.
Sanchez forces the issue against every opposition team. He doesn't wait to be invited to attack and he doesn't hesitate to drive forward. Despite his relative lack of goals, he's been a breath of fresh air for United. The most cavalier forward we've had in years.
Internet fans judge attacking players by their numbers.
Managers judge them by their overall contribution.
Iniesta had shit numbers for much of his career. The only imortant statistic is how many goals the team scores thanks to the presence of its individuals.
It's better to have an individual attacker who scores 10 goals himself but facilitates 70 team goals, rather than one who scores 20 individual goals but facilitates only 40 team goals. Of course, it's difficult to argue the point on an online forum. But that's where we are.
Sanchez forces the issue against every opposition team. He doesn't wait to be invited to attack and he doesn't hesitate to drive forward. Despite his relative lack of goals, he's been a breath of fresh air for United. The most cavalier forward we've had in years.
If he has another poor season, we must flog him to the States or China. We can't afford to pay astronomical wages to players who are stealing a life like Rooney did.
A fair point. but we've only scored 3+ goals in a game three times since Sanchez joined, and failed to score at all in seven! Before he joined last season, we scored 3+ goals nine times, and failed to score only four times.
We were a better team going forward without him. He's on the team on reputation more than anything. I hope he comes good, but if not we have other players who should replace him.
We would still have to compensate him and I doubt he would go to china
You can imagine the discussions that were had with the board to agree to smash the wage structure to bring him in. The promises that were made that we were signing a world class player, the missing piece of the jigsaw and then for him to under perform.
It is no wonder that Jose's summer signings were scrutinised so closely and a DOF required for me after this
It's really Wierd why some out of nowhere are getting that aggressive on the slightest suggestion that he wasn't as crap as people labelled him to be.
He just had a mixed bag game, a 6/10 or something. Chill out lads.
A large part of the scrutiny is he replaced a fan favourite, younger player who was playing better than he has been. Sanchez was poor against LC as he has been for most of his games for us. It's like having Rooney back but with less goals and love.I think he is heavily scrutinised & criticised due to the massive world class wages he is receiving, & fans not unsurprisingly expect world class performances.
The most silent of dominations.Internet fans judge attacking players by their numbers.
Managers judge them by their overall contribution.
Iniesta had shit numbers for much of his career. The only imortant statistic is how many goals the team scores thanks to the presence of its individuals.
It's better to have an individual attacker who scores 10 goals himself but facilitates 70 team goals, rather than one who scores 20 individual goals but facilitates only 40 team goals. Of course, it's difficult to argue the point on an online forum. But that's where we are.
Sanchez forces the issue against every opposition team. He doesn't wait to be invited to attack and he doesn't hesitate to drive forward. Despite his relative lack of goals, he's been a breath of fresh air for United. The most cavalier forward we've had in years.
Dropping players can certainly be a wake up call for those not putting the effort in. One thing you can't question Sanchez on is his work rate or effort so it's hard to see how that is going to help. Given his reputation/ previous quality and of course his wages he is going to get more rope for bad performances than any other players.He's criticised because of how much is expected of him. I was really disappointed in him on Friday because after a summer off and a full preseason you're expecting him to reassemble the player we saw at Arsenal i'd give him the next three games and if he's as poor as he was on Friday then might need to be dropped to give him a boot up the backside.
The most silent of dominations.
Internet fans judge attacking players by their numbers.
Managers judge them by their overall contribution.
Iniesta had shit numbers for much of his career. The only imortant statistic is how many goals the team scores thanks to the presence of its individuals.
It's better to have an individual attacker who scores 10 goals himself but facilitates 70 team goals, rather than one who scores 20 individual goals but facilitates only 40 team goals. Of course, it's difficult to argue the point on an online forum. But that's where we are.
Sanchez forces the issue against every opposition team. He doesn't wait to be invited to attack and he doesn't hesitate to drive forward. Despite his relative lack of goals, he's been a breath of fresh air for United. The most cavalier forward we've had in years.
That would be a great point except for the fact that our goals to games ratio, shots on goals and chance creation all went down since he joined us. And not by small numbers.
It's still too early to judge him or write him off and he works hard, but calling him a breath of fresh air for us considering his impact is just turning a blind eye at his performances.
We bought an experienced 29 year old player, 6 months at a new club should be enough time to settle.
We can only hope this last game was a one off.
I don't think people are too harsh on Sanchez. To be honest, if Martial plays like that, he will be absolutely killed by people here. I think people are more than fair towards Sanchez, and I did not put his wages into consideration, i don't really care how much the players earn.
Internet fans judge attacking players by their numbers.
Managers judge them by their overall contribution.
Iniesta had shit numbers for much of his career. The only imortant statistic is how many goals the team scores thanks to the presence of its individuals.
It's better to have an individual attacker who scores 10 goals himself but facilitates 70 team goals, rather than one who scores 20 individual goals but facilitates only 40 team goals. Of course, it's difficult to argue the point on an online forum. But that's where we are.
Sanchez forces the issue against every opposition team. He doesn't wait to be invited to attack and he doesn't hesitate to drive forward. Despite his relative lack of goals, he's been a breath of fresh air for United. The most cavalier forward we've had in years.
Martial in the first half of last season was MILES better then any form Sanchez has shown here. It's not even a comparison. If you want to look at it in actual productivity, general creativity, being entertaining to watch, whatever. Martial in the first half beats the shit Sanchez showed in the 2nd half in every single aspect. Sanchez has been complete shite so far, let's not kid ourselves. Hes quality at his best, but as of now, that hasnt been seen since the 16/17 season.If Martial plays like Sanchez did, he would be praised as the next Messi, Ronaldo, Sanchez and Neymar combined. Martial has done nothing compared to a poor Sanchez in terms of contribution to the team,and that's because Martial doesn't precisely shine in football intelligence. Martial should learn form Sanchez, even from the not so good version.
Sanchez hasn't exactly been a model player when it comes to football intelligence. Turning when it makes more sense to release the ball quickly, forcing the issue on through passes when the opportunity to release the runner has long passed. Right now all he does better than Martial is workrateIf Martial plays like Sanchez did, he would be praised as the next Messi, Ronaldo, Sanchez and Neymar combined. Martial has done nothing compared to a poor Sanchez in terms of contribution to the team,and that's because Martial doesn't precisely shine in football intelligence. Martial should learn form Sanchez, even from the not so good version.