Ayush_reddevil
Éire Abú
- Joined
- Mar 22, 2014
- Messages
- 11,422
Fees is pretty standard tbh. 15 million gets you nothing these days
Another Juve fan confirming what most people who watch him already knew. There is no way of spinning this transfer into a positive for us.Guys, De Jong is a playmaker, Rabiot a play breaker. Rabiot will suck ever sense of life out of your midfield. One of the most underwhelming midfielders I’ve seen wearing our jersey. Ramsey and Rabiot were incredible misbuys, but at least Ramsey was always injured. Unfortunately Rabiot doesn’t get injured a lot.
Cant shoot, pass, dribble, even though his height he’s a pussy. He had on average a good month per year, where he gives the idea of being a decent midfielder, but afterwards reality will slap you in the face and you’ll realize once again how bad he is.
He’s okay at marking I’ll give him that, but certainly it ain’t enough to compensate the rest.
This French croissant with stellar wages and his demanding mother is a guarantee for a very frustrating time.
Potentially, yesPeople actually believe we only made this bid after last nights game, as if this wasn't planned? Seriously?
Is that your way of saying it was a panic buy? That was my initial point. You called it a ''dumbass'' move, whatever that means, but it's the same fecking nonsense every year and to see Liverpool and City - our arch rivals - doing business early and dominating the league, when our club is run like absolute shit is sad to see.
Rant over!
Yes but the stats should actually back up the player being good, not just going off this "eye test" hullabaloo which is often a cover for whatever biases or random opinion the viewer has. You find a player, scout him, of course that's key and then stats should be a indicator. Or in reverse, the stats say this is a player to watch.Simply watching a youtube video of Rabiot tells the quality difference to McTominay. Don't let the stats fool you.
A new menu coming to your local McDonalds soon.
Seems like we could of got this done well before the game. So of there was a plan and he was in it, why now after the season started?People actually believe we only made this bid after last nights game, as if this wasn't planned? Seriously?
That shouldn't be the standard, just handing more big, long-term contracts to 2nd rate players because they're slightly better than what we have.Not a great player but sure as hell better than the two jokers we currently employ in midfield.
No, it's my way to say that we both agree on the idea that the timing is bad. I don't think that it's a panic buy because I think that it was planned and has nothing to do with yesterday's game.
Yes but the stats should actually back up the player being good, not just going off this "eye test" hullabaloo which is often a cover for whatever biases or random opinion the viewer has. You find a player, scout him, of course that's key and then stats should be a indicator. Or in reverse, the stats say this is a player to watch.
I've yet to see a Liverpool, City midfielder with appalling metrics. It just doesn't happen. One, because their sides are dominant. And two because they're bloody good players. But how do you get to being a dominant side? Well..you sign bloody good players to begin with or those with the potential to be, that show stand out metrics. You don't sign those that appear hapless and then expect them to show something else.
People actually believe we only made this bid after last nights game, as if this wasn't planned? Seriously?
I’m pretty sure one of the big reasons he left PSG was because he didn’t want to play as DM. Apparently he sees himself as box to box.Some analytics folk on twitter seem to like him as a DM if we only look at on the pitch things. So i guess that's something. The little I've seen of him, think he's nowhere near good enough, but hey, any bit of optimism from some analytics guys is at least a plus.
15m seems way too much though.
Seems like we could of got this done well before the game. So of there was a plan and he was in it, why now after the season started?
Yes but the stats should actually back up the player being good, not just going off this "eye test" hullabaloo which is often a cover for whatever biases or random opinion the viewer has. You find a player, scout him, of course that's key and then stats should be a indicator. Or in reverse, the stats say this is a player to watch.
I've yet to see a Liverpool, City midfielder with appalling metrics. It just doesn't happen. One, because their sides are dominant. And two because they're bloody good players. But how do you get to being a dominant side? Well..you sign bloody good players to begin with or those with the potential to be, that show stand out metrics. You don't sign those that appear hapless and then expect them to show something else.
That point is interesting because people are sharing his worst season's stat as an indication of what the player is overall, they even try to extrapolate them to previous seasons that had far different passing stats.
La Sauce
He actually his a DM however he wants to play and recently has played as a B2B. If he is the alternative to FDJ then I presume its under the assumption he'll play as a 6. I would personally play him in front of the defence and Fred further up the pitch alongside Eriksen.
Also to those comparing the statistics with McMayonaise, Juve played a very negative system so the statistics are skewed. Its not entirely fair to compare them as like for like.
I have seen him several times without seeing him standing out, but I have a few questions for @JPRouve :
1. Is he technically gifted?
2. How is he at receiving the ball on the turn?
3. Can he pass through the lines better than either one of Mcfred?
4. Can he beat a player and drive the ball forward at all?
In fact, anyone whose seen him at PSG in particular, where the team looked to attack and initially had him as a DM would be greatly appreciated in answering these questions.
And bought him the day after we lost against Brighton.....
Jesus Christ, this is fecking grim.
Fair enough. We'll have to agree to disagree then.
Anyway, what do actually think of Rabiot as a player? Would he suit the single pivot role that ten Hag has been playing Fred in - both on and off the ball?
ETH to Rabiot - "I like you, but as a Fred"Some analytics folk on twitter seem to like him as a DM if we only look at on the pitch things. So i guess that's something. The little I've seen of him, think he's nowhere near good enough, but hey, any bit of optimism from some analytics guys is at least a plus.
15m seems way too much though.
Between the FDJ farce, Ronaldo feckery, Arnautovic garbage and this, it truly has been a proper banter window...
Our rival fanbases are having a blast
Another Juve fan confirming what most people who watch him already knew. There is no way of spinning this transfer into a positive for us.