AngeloHenriquez
Full Member
If we are pivoting from Ugarte then Rabiot & Amrabat wouldn't be a bad option
I would seriously hope not, this would just smack of the past mistakes of big name signing to supposedly appease the dumb fans. It has grubby Glazer fingerprints all over it.Reading this thread feels as if we already signed him or are advanced in negotiations. But I'm still waiting for one reliable source linking us with him. I don't think he's even on our list.
We should sign Ineos fingerprinted talent, which seems to be Sander Berge after failing to get Ugarte (who isn't particularly good, anyway).I would seriously hope not, this would just smack of the past mistakes of big name signing to supposedly appease the dumb fans. It has grubby Glazer fingerprints all over it.
Big name, huge wages, short term fix.rather than blithely dismissing it because he 'gives off Glazer vibes', whatever that means.
Big name, huge wages, short term fix.
That's what it means.
What would be the reason Rabiot still hasn't signed somewhere? Is he waiting for a deal too good to be true or are there some assurances given by a certain club?
Free transfers aren't affected by the deadline day for transfers so he can afford to sit and wait till someone gets desperate and pays the kings ransom he would want.He can probably afford to wait to see who is knocking at the door. Was at the Euro too so he's probably in shape.
He maybe won't get the contract he wants but I'm sure there's plenty of decent suitors.
But which club would be willing to pay the bill and fits the profile he wants, a club big enough for his status. Would he be willing to fill his pockets @ the Saudi's at his age?He can probably afford to wait to see who is knocking at the door. Was at the Euro too so he's probably in shape.
He maybe won't get the contract he wants but I'm sure there's plenty of decent suitors.
But which club would be willing to pay the bill and fits the profile he wants, a club big enough for his status. Would he be willing to fill his pockets @ the Saudi's at his age?
We should sign Ineos fingerprinted talent, which seems to be Sander Berge after failing to get Ugarte (who isn't particularly good, anyway).
Fact is Rabiot is better than two midfielders whose position he would occupy. He's available on a free and wages would be affordable.
We should be looking at him as an option, rather than blithely dismissing it because he 'gives off Glazer vibes', whatever that means.
Anyone in here who doesn't want him should go to the United squad page and take a look at our midfield options and then have another think about it.
Rabiot is a very different player to Ugarte. Ugarte would be a Cassimiro replacement/depth. Rabiot would want to play in the same role as Mainoo, or even realistically even more further forward.If we are pivoting from Ugarte then Rabiot & Amrabat wouldn't be a bad option
Yeah let's bring in another player who's 29 going on 30 on monster wages and a huge signing on bonus and then wonder why we are repeating the same mistakes of Woodward and co.Anyone in here who doesn't want him should go to the United squad page and take a look at our midfield options and then have another think about it.
Like we did with Casemiro?Anyone in here who doesn't want him should go to the United squad page and take a look at our midfield options and then have another think about it.
What is 2/2+1?What about a 2/2+1 year contract
BODMAS says it's 2What is 2/2+1?
BODMAS says it's 2
Got to get up pretty early in the morning to catch me out.
Yeah let's bring in another player who's 29 going on 30 on monster wages and a huge signing on bonus and then wonder why we are repeating the same mistakes of Woodward and co.
Like we did with Casemiro?
Endlessly repeating the same mistakes i.e. purchasing players who want to sit on their last big contract while their physical attributes decline massively doesn't feel like a particularly good idea to me
Technically he's a good player who can play 6 or 8. But you have to question why no one is in for him? Liverpool are looking towards Zubimendi. Athletico signed Conor Gallagher. In both cases why no Rabiot?Congratulations you completely misinterpreted my statement. I didn’t say “sign him at all costs” I said I want him.
And for the record not a single “free signing” we brought in under Woodward could be considered a mistake.
Technically he's a good player who can play 6 or 8. But you have to question why no one is in for him? Liverpool are looking towards Zubimendi. Athletico signed Conor Gallagher. In both cases why no Rabiot?
Most likely because he was a stupidly large signing on fee, guessing £10mil +, stupidly high wages, guessing 250k a week + and a 5 year contract. Add to that probably huge agent fees (which go to his agent, his mum) and he ends up being a substantial commitment in a financial package.
We get 12-18 months out of him then he drops off a cliff and we are stuck with his wages and him for a number of years.
I'd rather we didn't sign anyone, but made sure we got the right player in for the long term project be it in the January window or next summers window. Its bad enough we can't shift Casemiro, we'll add the French version to our books and watch history repeat itself.
Technically he's a good player who can play 6 or 8. But you have to question why no one is in for him? Liverpool are looking towards Zubimendi. Athletico signed Conor Gallagher. In both cases why no Rabiot?
Most likely because he was a stupidly large signing on fee, guessing £10mil +, stupidly high wages, guessing 250k a week + and a 5 year contract. Add to that probably huge agent fees (which go to his agent, his mum) and he ends up being a substantial commitment in a financial package.
We get 12-18 months out of him then he drops off a cliff and we are stuck with his wages and him for a number of years.
I'd rather we didn't sign anyone, but made sure we got the right player in for the long term project be it in the January window or next summers window. Its bad enough we can't shift Casemiro, we'll add the French version to our books and watch history repeat itself.
We will see won't we. Someone will sign him eventually. We knew how much he wanted last season (a lot).All this is entirely made up, nothing likely about it. There's no team outside of Saudi that is giving him anything close to that (and even they wouldn't do 5 years).
I meant ending up in a Casemiro type situation after 12-18 months.I don't see him like Casemiro whatsoever
I meant ending up in a Casemiro type situation after 12-18 months.
Are we really desperate? We're going to suck this season anyways. He's going to be here for 5 years if he signs. Seems short sighted to make a signing just because he's an improvement over 1 year of his contract's midfield.
There is zero links with himIs there even proper links to him or are you guys just debating for the sake of it?
I don’t know why we didn’t go for that centre half from Fulham that went to Chelsea on a free. Chelsea have 9 centre backsFor a club that does not have cash and qualify played, deals like Rabiot and Hummels would have really helped us for the short term. We need energy in the midfield and 2 defenders who can play a high line
He's on 180k there. Our wage bill needs sorting.I don’t know why we didn’t go for that centre half from Fulham that went to Chelsea on a free. Chelsea have 9 centre backs