OK guys, whatever.
Maybe I just have another opinion of a very top talent. Noone said Januzaj is crap, but I just don't call most of what he did last season that impressive that I have to remember it and write about his dribble against Swansea. I mean Ashley Young looked like Messi for 5 seconds only a few days ago when he actually took someone on.
What I call impressive and memorable is for example Sterling's composure and great finish in a high pressure game last season against City. As for dribbling, Sterling does it all the time so I find it a bit strange to write about Januzaj's "dribbling ability against Swansea".
It's a bit like ppl claiming Rooney was our best player last season. Well, yeah he scored and assisted as usual, and I don't remember exactly against who he dribbled, assisted or whatever, but what I remember is that the whole last season he didn't do anything impressive at all for a supposed world class player (apart from against Leverkusen when the whole team played well).
Now Januzaj is no Rooney and 10 years younger, but for me he just didn't have many "wow" moments last season for a supposed world class talent.
I don't understand this line of thought to be fair. Seems highly reactionary on the basis of one season. Sterling is about a year and a quarter bit more experienced than Januzaj who was only in his debut season of top level football. It's September in Adnan's second season right ? Well at this stage last season (i.e. Sterling's sophomore season) he was dropped by Rodgers and a lot Liverpool supporters were at his throats, some even describing him as a wasted talent at such young an age.
Yet one season later - he's to a man the best teenager in the world ? I'd agree he has the edge but it's only for now. Adnan is still adapting while Sterling is into his fourth season. In 2012/ 2013 Sterling scored 2 and assisted just 2 in 19 league starts. Yet Sterling has more composure and finishing ability than Januzaj who scored 4 and assisted 3 in league 15 starts in 2013/ 2014 ?
People talk of Cristiano and it's all really good, but isn't there the benefit of hindsight ? He had scored a similar 4 and assisted 4 in 14 league starts in 2003/ 2004. There were loads of people who didn't rate him at all. A vast number even preferred Quarsema. The vast majority thought Robben and Reyes were better during the early years. You don't even have to look far.
Here's a sample comment from the Caf itself during his early years in rebuttal to Ronaldo's critics :
know that we know "one trick pony" has more than one trick.......
just wondering where all the Quaresma supporters have gone?
injured? boo hoo. cant find a game for barca ( blame that on quinton fortune in philadelphia last summer)? i forgot, injured. maybe by the next world cup quaresma will not be injured and might get a game for his club OR country.
unless people stop judging major competitions as a measuring stick.
not bad for 75 minutes, one goal, one assist, 19 yrs old.
Here's one leveled at someone who was a Ronaldo fan :
O.k.
He's the best in the world
Or could be.....
If he was.
But he is'nt....
Or is he likely to be!
Try being realistic...............................................and i'll empty the trash can
Others posting this :
Most overated 12mill I've yet seen.
As for rating that a good goal, yer havin a larf
In time he may come good, but whilst fullbacks watch the ball and not those quick feet he'll have to find some other trick to get past.
He's quick , has fast feet but cannot pass a ball accurately to save his life.
As to wether he's a team player is also arguable.
Conclusion...
could do much much better
Concern over his finishing ability :
I don't quite see it happening. He might be extremely fast and skilful, but he doesn't have that "thing" that good strikers, say, Ruud has. When Ruud gets the ball you know he's going to score. I don't see it with Ronaldo. Besides, United needs people who can provide scoring opportunities from the wings at the moment. Having said that, it'd be brilliant if Ronaldo can play both up front and as a winger. Gives the team unpredictability.
One talks about how Adnan played well only vs the smaller teams. And Ronaldo himself wasn't very impressive vs the bigger teams at the start. His best debut season performance was vs bloody Milwall. He was subsequently labelled a one trick pony, a diver like Adnan and a good time Charlie who didn't show up vs big teams (especially Europe where he didn't score a goal until his 3rd season). Keane and Neville even openly criticized his play. But the fact of the matter is Moyes didn't play Januzaj in a lot of bigger matches : Didn't play vs Bayern or City, just 15 mins vs Arsenal away and Liverpool at OT. Started just one match against a big 4 opponent vs Chelsea and Stamford Bridge and was simply our best player. The nutmeg of Ivanovic and another instance where he turned Chelsea's defense inside out to set Welbeck up for a goal (which he didn't score) were worthy of highlight reels.
Januzaj showed remarkable poise, great technique and dribbling ability, composure and most importantly the belief - he always showed up when more experienced players went into hiding.
Even someone like Van Persie who is more well placed to comment had this take on Adnan :
"He's a great player and I'm a great fan of his," Van Persie told. "I thought earlier in preseason that he has something special.
"Over the years I've seen so many young players and I can honestly say that of all the young players I've seen he is right up there in the top one or two."
"He's a special player," he said. "He will give Manchester United a great bunch of goals and great games."
He believes Januzaj is the second or even the first most talented player he's ever seen. This coming from someone who played with a young Robben, Sneijder, van der Vaart for Holland, played for Feyenoord when Ibrahimovic was at Ajax; and Cesc, Ramsey, Wilshere, Nasri at Arsenal.