RedRover
Full Member
- Joined
- Mar 19, 2007
- Messages
- 9,095
Isn't that all just more to do with playing style than quality/effectiveness? Johnson drifts in a lot because he needs to be more involved than Lennon. I don't think that's better movement, and having someone who sticks to the touchline is very useful (and takes a lot more selflessness). He gets involved in the buildup more but then he gives the ball away an awful lot so again I'm not sure how much of a strength that is. As for picking a team-mate out with crosses I'd say Lennon's much better at that than he used to be (see him picking Bale out v Newcastle just this weekend) and is better than Johnson. He is a better goalscorer in fairness.
Bale's very "kick and run" but you've never mentioned that as a criticism of him, and you think he's a top player...
Maybe - but he'smore capable of doing that than the likes of Lennon. he's comfortable on both sides, and decent through the middle when he needs to be - can also pick a decent pass. To me he seems a more intelligent player, although he clearly needs to tighten up and improve his end product. More games should help that.
Bale has good movement as well, but he is a bit "kick and run" - the difference for me is that he has plenty of end product and is physically very hard for teams to handle. I also think he has the raw attributes to keep developing and could become a really top player if he stays injury free.
Lennon has improved, and fair play to him, and if you want that kind of player you know what you're going to get. For me, in that position as part of a three you need to be able to contribute more than beat a man and sling in a cross. A player ike Johnson can come inside, or stay wide and may get a few more goals. Still - all amatter of opinion.