I think so. Spurs aren't a club that has won a lot of trophies. Their last trophy is league cup 10 years ago. Their last important trophy is FA Cup in 1991. Even domestic cups for them in the last 30 years are as rare as UCL for us, so of course that winning some trophy for Spurs is extremely important. They can act as high as they want that they are a big club and prefer to play in UCL, but an FA Cup trophy actually tops any season they have had in the last 25 years.
Southampton and Espanyol are even more starved for trophies, so him not having won a trophy ever in his career is a black mark. Make yourself a question: which top manager didn't win anything during his first 9 years as a manager? If the answer is none, then why Pochetino should actually be considered in the same level as them.
He is a good manager though, but until he starts winning trophies, he is not in the elite group.
First of all...a league cup wouldn't change anything. I don't think you actually realise the project at Spurs and what the ambition is.
Read these quotes from Poch from yesterday.
Mauricio Pochettino feels the pressure of sending Tottenham to their new stadium as a Champions League team but insists the club's long-term plan is more important than winning a trophy.
Spurs face Arsenal at Wembley on Saturday, knowing victory would deliver a major boost to their own chances of finishing in the Premier League top four and deal a hammer blow to the hopes of their north London rivals.
Arsenal trail Tottenham by four points in the table, with the prospect of Pochettino's side ending a second consecutive season above the Gunners now within sight.
League position, however, counts for only so much. Spurs are yet to win any silverware during Pochettino's tenure, while a turbulent few years for Arsenal has still included them lifting the FA Cup three times in four seasons
Pochettino, whose side are due to return to an overhauled White Hart Lane next season, claims reviewing Tottenham's progress on trophies alone is to miss the wider point.
"When we arrived we realised how difficult it was and what would be the process of moving from one stadium to another. We knew it was a difficult moment in terms of the whole process of the club but we went through
"I feel the responsibility to manage a club and a company, that you need results to be sure that all the income will be at a level to start a process to build a new stadium, to attract players, to play Champions League.
"That is a little bit unfair when you compare us with another. People say, 'Tottenham need to win a title'. But for me, the process is more than winning a title.
"Another thing that is important, when you compete against massive sides like City, United, Arsenal, Chelsea, Liverpool and the broadcasters give them massive money - that massive money, for them, goes to investing in new players.
"For us it means to build the project so that one day we have the capacity to do the same or change the philosophy."
What he's basically saying is for our rivals, they can spend all their money on players and concentrate on winning trophies. For us as have had to concentrate on building the club up on and off the field to enable us to get into a position to consistently challenge for the elite titles.
Winning a league cup won't change that.
Also for you to somehow make it a negative that he didn't win a trophy at Southampton. What on earth do you expect? There isn't a manager on earth who could guarantee Southampton trophies bar incredible fortune and luck. Football is quite a simple game, the teams with the best players normally win all the trophies...and the biggest and richest clubs have all the best players. So you tell me which top managers managed midtable sides like Espanyol and Southampton and won trophies? I'm interested to hear that. Did Mourinho or Pep Guardiola? Hmmm no they didn't.