@Chesterlestreet what day suits you? I would prefer Tuesday or Wednesday myself
@Chesterlestreet what day suits you? I would prefer Tuesday or Wednesday myself
Wednesday it isWednesday looks good, mate.
Wednesday it is
Agree on the Kohler shout and the shift to zonal marking that has created increasingly all-rounded centre-halves.Kohler ? He usually stands out between the stoppers. From the mid 90's on most quality defenders were more allrounders, which makes it more difficult to pin down the likes of Nesta, Maldini, Thuram as one of the two. I'd say that when zonal marking became the way to go, the stopper/sweeper combination lost its importance and we saw a shift to defenders who can do both at least to a somewhat acceptable degree. Obviously you still had a few pairs that hinted at the old setup, e.g. Terry&Carvalho or Rio/Vidic, but it wasn't as clear cut as back in the 70's and 80's.
Checked the PES stats Costacurta is ridiculously overrated there, 95 for defending while Schwarzenbeck has 89Would you guys rate Schwarzenbeck better than Costacurta?
I'm free all week, boss is away on travel tooFt
Sure, what day?
Yep.
Yep.
Checked the PES stats Costacurta is ridiculously overrated there, 95 for defending while Schwarzenbeck has 89
Schwarzenbeck for me though, I just like him better
Not sure what Chester has said wrong there as it seems perfectly clear what he means.
Schwarzenbeck is a good player but it's clearly partnering with Beckenbauer that elevates him in these drafts.
Also I don't think he's a better partner than Figueroa, as I don't think there's really anything at all that Schwarzenbeck does better.
Probably because that Milan defensive unit was one of the best. Adds extra brownie points I suppose. Don't think Beckenbauer and Schwarzenbeck ever had a pair of consistent fullbacks. Breitner, Hansen, Andersson it was always changing, so tends to underrated.
Then again Schwarzenbeck undoubtedly (and that isn't even debatable, in my opinion) gets a point or two for being Beckenbauer's lieutenant.
It's some kind of circle with guys like that:
A: He's overrated 'cause he was X's sidekick.
B: Nah, he's actually underrated, 'cause people only think he was good 'cause he was X's sidekick, but that ain't true.
And so forth.
Fact is both those players are excellent examples of extremely reliable, top class defenders, the sort you can win anything with - and arguably also the sort you don't win anything without.
Going back to the "stopper" question, i.e. does anyone really stand out as being an absolute GOAT among the centre halves who weren't ball players or super passers or demigods in general? It's a very interesting question - even Kohler, who was mentioned as a possible candidate, was something beyond a "pure" stopper in the sense that what - in reality - makes him stand out to the degree he does was his almost preternatural knack for marking and shadowing attackers. Most top class stoppers are GOOD at marking, that goes with the territory, but Kohler was far beyond good.
Then again, being a phenomenal marker isn't something you only see in central defenders. Some of the best markers in history were primarily fullbacks - or defensive midfielders. So it isn't an exclusive stopper trait by any stretch.
Being excellent in the air, excellent in the tackle, strong, fast (in terms of reacting to danger, not necessarily in terms of pace as such), calm (not being error prone or prone to panic under stress) - these I would say are the key areas for a classic stopper. Does anyone excel at this to the extent that he can be labeled a GOAT?
Being excellent in the air, excellent in the tackle, strong, fast (in terms of reacting to danger, not necessarily in terms of pace as such), calm (not being error prone or prone to panic under stress) - these I would say are the key areas for a classic stopper. Does anyone excel at this to the extent that he can be labeled a GOAT?
Burgnich would be the prime candidate for that imo, as too would Bergomi (tbf he is in the class of Kohler), Gentile and Förster. Santamaria is widely regarded as being amongst the best when talking about pure stoppers as well.
Hmm surely some of the classic British stoppers deserve to be mentioned here. Billy Wright and Jack Charlton perhaps? Ok, not GOAT level but very good stoppers nonetheless. John Charles was equally brilliant as a CB and as a striker, but he is too talented to be labelled as a pure stopper unfortunately.
...and Neil Franklin deserve a shout here too.
They are both ball playing really. Generally most of the best lean towards being better ball players. I can't really think of a GOAT CB who was more of a stopper.
Just because defenders are so great that they can do everything to a very high level, doesn't mean they were not classified as one or the other.
I think it's more of sum of parts not being more than the total. Yeah, Figueroa could do the same job, but that's restricting Figueroa's game a lot. Simple case of too many Generals and not enough soldiers. If you want the best of both, they are better off paired with someone else than with each other.
The merit of his Ballon was more about the value placed on the World Cup rather than his role as a combative centre-half. His level of performance was clearly a cut above anyone else in Germany and has been unmatched in either of the tournaments since. The controversy was more about how much weight should be placed on his patchy form at Real in the autumn. There was a problem in that neither of the other contenders - Ronaldinho and Henry - were able to maintain their brilliant 2005/06 form into the World Cup and beyond (both effectively underwhelmed from the Champions League final onwards). I was happy that he got recognised for his impeccable performances in winning the World Cup.A modern shout might be Cannavaro. And then, right away, we see what the "problem" is, or might be: I don't think I've ever come across anyone neutral (that is, in terms of club affiliation) who thinks his Ballon is deserved. And part of that is - as an underlying factor - that he simply was too limited a player to "deserve" it. There are other arguments too, by all means, but it has at least something to do with this.
Ultimately those qualities in themselves are probably not enough to elevate somebody into the stratosphere alongside the greatest of all time. I'd say there are two reasons the greatest central defenders (Beckenbauer, Baresi, Figueroa) stand out. First is that weren't just good defenders, they also added so much more on the ball. They were often their team's best playmakers as well as being their top defenders. Second, is their immense intelligence in reading the game, organising and dictating play. It's similar to the comparison between the greatest no 10s and the greatest 9s. Inevitably the 10s win out because their creativity and vision generally sets them apart and is what makes them harder to shut out of a game. That greater value we place on mental and technical based qualities rather than generally physical ones is largely why stoppers don't get the same kudos as the sweeper or libero.Being excellent in the air, excellent in the tackle, strong, fast (in terms of reacting to danger, not necessarily in terms of pace as such), calm (not being error prone or prone to panic under stress) - these I would say are the key areas for a classic stopper. Does anyone excel at this to the extent that he can be labeled a GOAT?
Yeah. That's what strikes me about the PES stats and the Xtratime stuff - the rankings are all incredibly arbitrary. It's a small community and when one person has a hard-on for player X, they jump miles ahead of where they should be. In fairness they often do a lot of 'research' but sometimes it's a bit feeble - e.g. Scotland's greatest ever keeper happens to be the custodian for Celtic's EC win in 1967 - even though he never made his international debut till he was 36 and no Scot would put him in their national all-time XI.Checked the PES stats Costacurta is ridiculously overrated there, 95 for defending while Schwarzenbeck has 89
Schwarzenbeck for me though, I just like him better
Poor @Invictus, first he is up against Balu, now Joga... It's hard to imagine a more difficult introduction to the draft
Me after the draw :
The merit of his Ballon was more about the value placed on the World Cup rather than his role as a combative centre-half. His level of performance was clearly a cut above anyone else in Germany and has been unmatched in either of the tournaments since. The controversy was more about how much weight should be placed on his patchy form at Real in the autumn. There was a problem in that neither of the other contenders - Ronaldinho and Henry - were able to maintain their brilliant 2005/06 form into the World Cup and beyond (both effectively underwhelmed from the Champions League final onwards). I was happy that he got recognised for his impeccable performances in winning the World Cup.
Sunday could be an option. Monday at a push. Thursday would be okay. Any of those suit?
Let's do Sunday then.Sunday could be an option. Monday at a push. Thursday would be okay. Any of those suit?
Good read, that - thanks @Skizzo.
Probably mentioned it before but I bumped into Best once years ago (I was just a kid, really). Lovely guy in every way, but he was off the wagon (again) at the time, so he didn't make much sense. What did strike me, however (and which always struck me, when Best was interviewed over the years), was precisely what Summerbee alludes to above: The fact that he was humble in a way you'd never expect, or "shy" as Summerbee says. And lost, somehow - out of place. It wasn't just the drinking - it was something else, can't quite explain it.
But seeing him in the flesh, even in that state, you certainly understood right away what made him so attractive: He had charisma like few people I've ever encountered - he was simply glowing with it. Strange - and great - man.