The Stain
Soccer Manager's Highwayman
- Joined
- Aug 23, 2013
- Messages
- 12,500
Gio, i saw what thread you were looking at. I knew that must have been an inspiration after those picks.
Don't keep it to yourself, we all deserve to knowGio, i saw what thread you were looking at. I knew that must have been an inspiration after those picks.
I've already said to muchDon't keep it to yourself, we all deserve to know
There was a couple of players I hoped to go for in the 11th and 12th pick but im sure they'll go before its my turn again
I wrote down 35 odd names and decided which were most likely to go first... Hasn't really worked that way due to the list having 3 names left.You have plans for 11th and 12th pick? My research hasn't even covered half that
I barely have plans for rounds 3 and 4 given that the ones i'm thinking will most likely be gone by the 5 guys in front of me.You have plans for 11th and 12th pick? My research hasn't even covered half that
Fascinating. I was torn between Jansen and Rensenbrink and actually prefered Jansen the whole time. Just changed my mind last second .
SamePenned you down for Haan myself.
If they aren't well known, then does the position matter?I'm at a cross roads at the moment. Most players left aren't well known in the grand scheme of things and I am wondering whether to go attacking or to go sensible.
I have so many players on my list. Over 100 and I don't know 95 of them.If they aren't well known, then does the position matter?
Then you've definitely got my ace up the sleeve on your listI have so many players on my list. Over 100 and I don't know 95 of them.
Probably. I've got way too many players on there and no way to determine who was better then who other then contradictory lists. That's also not including the load of right wingers I just got rid of.Then you've definitely got my ace up the sleeve on your list
I have so many players on my list. Over 100 and I don't know 95 of them.
You don't have to know 'em - just how to sell 'em.
I have never watched a football match in my life - I just go by stats and word of mouth. Has worked out brilliantly for me so far.
Let me introduce you to a brand new world of pes stats!!
pesstatsdatabase.com
This is going to change your life.
Never heard of this website, how old or new is it?Let me introduce you to a brand new world of pes stats!!
pesstatsdatabase.com
This is going to change your life.
Never heard of this website, how old or new is it?
Sorry I'll get a pick in the next few minutes.
Wait, its pro evo???
Brian Kidd said:“He was sublime. So elegant. Such an excellent manipulator of the ball. He had so much guile and sophistication. People talk about the technique of the influx of foreign players these days. Kazi was way up there.
Every part of my research includes wiki, then googling "player X pes stats" to see what they have to say about them.
I haven't stretched that far enough to using them in match threads yet. ...But I've sent Pat a fair few links from there
That is shameful. Everybody knows Wiki isn't a reliable source.
Especially since @Edgar Allan Pillow spends half his time editing it.
Let me introduce you to a brand new world of pes stats!!
pesstatsdatabase.com
This is going to change your life.
Yeah, we've had the PES debate before.
I think it's a waste of time, myself - not least because I actually used to play the Pro Evo games.
1. The stats themselves are parameters which make sense for a computer generated "player" in a video game. They're not a reflection of the actual, historical player's characteristics and abilities. They're loosely based on the latter, obviously, but the key term would be "loosely".
2. The people who tweak the default stats (which are based on God knows what) - or create the stats from scratch - are not necessarily objective. Some of them probably are, but even the more objective ones may be idiots.
3. The serious contributors on that site are people who take the GAME nature of the thing into consideration: They tweak the stats in order to make the players more "realistic" within the game. The latter being absolutely the key - it's a GAME.
4. They have older players in that database of theirs whose stats are based on very little - and which have been contributed by people whose opinion on the player in question has gone virtually unchallenged.
5. Using numbers in the way they do is deceptive and ultimately detrimental. It leads to over-simplification and creates a false impression of exactitude - in areas where the qualities which should be measured are per definition (and common sense) not exact.
So, fun though it may be - the PES shite should be considered a no-go for us. It's no substitute at all for watching available footage - or even for reading up on players in available written records.