Camilo
Full Member
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2014
- Messages
- 3,077
JD is a stupid name. I'm calling him James because that's his name.
JD is a stupid name. I'm calling him James because that's his name.
They're saying Musk called Trump to advocate for Vance as late as yesterday morning. Musk is also contributing a whopping 45m a month to a Trump super pac.
Yay plutocracyThey're saying Musk called Trump to advocate for Vance as late as yesterday morning. Musk is also contributing a whopping 45m a month to a Trump super pac.
Yay plutocracy
I think the stupid amounts of cash Elon donates will supersede thatFortunately his South African ex pat, biz bro pal David Sacks' speech got panned by most last night. People are asking how Sacks was allowed to even get a speaking spot.
Nothing has changed since 2016I'm shocked they're not at least putting up a false challenger, someone who Biden can be seen to 'beat'.
I know there's nothing unusual about the president getting the automatic nomination but with everything that's happened it comes across as weak and elitist.
The abortion issue prevented disaster for the Dems in the mid-terms, it's a winning issue. Trump/Vance is an incredibly anti-abortion ticket, they should be all over this.
Watching this as a bystander it's frankly unbelievable. If this was local elections in my county in Poland I would be shocked at the ineptitude and complete lack of awareness, and here we are watching this unfold in the most powerful and influential country in the world.It's a biased sample, but every single one of the 179 comments on the NYT article today about forcing Biden in early are furious at the DNC.
The fck is wrong with these people? If you're american, please consider we writing your rep. We're doing it now, as there's almost nothing else we can do.
My rep is William TimmonsIt's a biased sample, but every single one of the 179 comments on the NYT article today about forcing Biden in early are furious at the DNC.
The fck is wrong with these people? If you're american, please consider we writing your rep. We're doing it now, as there's almost nothing else we can do.
Trump is a thousand times smarter than this guy, politically speaking.
Fortunately his South African ex pat, biz bro pal David Sacks' speech got panned by most last night. People are asking how Sacks was allowed to even get a speaking spot.
Yeah maybe, but let's not forget that for a while it was common knowledge that DeSantis was going to take over the Party, and that he was much smarter and more dangerous than Trump.
You are probably right re DeSantis - many thought he would be the next in line.
Difference being here though is that Vance will be VP, so will get to run for President in 2028, probably unchallenged within the GOP.
Seriously go listen to his speech last night. It was one of the worst political speeches you will see at an convention. The guy talks like a big alpha male on X but is an absolute soft spoken shi*bag in real life.Who is asking that? Sacks is more deserving of a speaking spot than Kristi Noem, Charlie Kirk, or Amber Rose
Maybe from a marketing perspective. But from a policy perspective, no. Trump is a political weather vein - he will move any way the wind blows.
I mean, his latest idea on removing tax from tips came from the caddies at his golf club.
Vance has an ideology and will know how to pull the right levers to get things done.
Who is asking that? Sacks is more deserving of a speaking spot than Kristi Noem, Charlie Kirk, or Amber Rose
Seriously go listen to his speech last night. It was one of the worst political speeches you will see at an convention. The guy talks like a big alpha male on X but is an absolute soft spoken shi*bag in real life.
In political terms he's a nobody. The fact that he's a pro-Putin stooge who spends most of his time advocating for Russian interests is yet another reason why he shouldn't be anywhere near the RNC.
I think you're wrong. Sacks, Thiel, and Elon are incredibly influential in political terms—they played a key role in securing Trump his running mate and in doing so, shaping the GOP's direction for the next decade.
They're giving money and buying influence. Nothing about them has anything remotely to do with the interests of Republican voters. They're simply buying their way to a seat at the table if Trump wins - basically this is little more than wealthy elites purchasing influence in exchange for money. In Sacks' case, I'm sure there will now be a deep dive by the media on his business relations with Russian oligarchs, politicians, and their subsidiaries.
Fascinating to listen in on a private call like that. No surprise, Trump sounds just as incoherent in private as he does in public!