gaffs
Full Member
But you have to assume all three things, cause she's not actually saying any of it. And your assumptions may be wrong, too. Either way, it makes more sense if people vote for what's said than what isn't said but you'd like to be true. Cause I could just as easily assume that the border policy will not substantially change under a Harris government, that Harris will cater to 'traditional' Republican voters, and that she will continue to proudly use the US military as a global lethal force. That would surprise no-one and is actually in line with her campaign.
I agree, it makes sense to vote on what she has said she will do.
She has said what she would do re the Border. She has asked for Lankford's bill to be put back through the Senate. Will that "solve" the border crisis, no, but it is a step in the right direction.
What part of her campaign makes you say that she will "continue to proudly use the US military as a global lethal force" ??