I'm in winding down mode now for the most part, hence posting less. What's done is done, now I just await outcomes.
A couple of little tidbits -
1) My best friend is from Miami (she actually studies law in Chicago now, but apparently as she used to live in Miami she's registered there and you can kinda pick if you move around... seems weird but ok) - Has some faith, runs an intersectional bible study whatever that is. One assumes to study the bible. Anyway, she's pretty worried about the 'shy' trump vote - apparently a lot of people aren't talking about it, but are admitting it in bible group etc. Perhaps not a typical demographic for 18-35 religious people. I tried to reassure her that the 'shy trump' vote is probably weighted correctly for the most part, but it's hard to convince people. Also completely convinced that Trump would be willing to take the country to the brink to stay in power. (This may or may not be the view of the average american midwest [from Iowa, Florida resident and now in Illinois] 30yo white female, but it was striking how convinced she is that Trump has a big shot and that everybody in her hometown and back 'home' in Florida was willing to vote for him.) That's perhaps a big sector of the population that would buy the take that he "won," and give some sort of legitimacy to the wave of bullshit he's gonna unleash post election.
2) I've been doing some play modeling really wrt turnout. I don't really write articles but may post some pretty graphs later. I suspect that pollsters, even good pollsters like Monmouth are incorrectly weighting the 18-35 turnout. Many use "18-49" and that's just not enough granularity for my liking. Generally pollsters struggle to get the '18-30' part of the '18-49' on the phone. With the recent extreme high voting applications, the hypothesis that youth turnout may be far higher than expected may be solid. If this is correct, it's gonna be a landslide. Could even be 55 senate seats.
3) I really dislike Kamala Harris. I don't get what she adds to the ticket.